ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Mitoxantrone With or Without Docetaxel in Treating Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002544
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 27, 2003
Last Update Posted : August 2, 2013
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
  Recruitment Status : Completed
  Primary Completion Date : No date given
  Actual Study Completion Date : November 2002
Publications of Results:
Other Publications:
Heidemann E, Souchon R, Stoger H, et al.: First-line monochemotherapy with mitoxantrone versus combination with fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in high-risk metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial. Onkologie 23(1): 54-59, 2000.
Heidemann E, Stoeger H, Souchon R, et al.: Balance of time to progression, quality of life, and overall survival: more gain from treatment in single agent treatment with mitoxantrone (N) than with the combination of fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC). Results of a multicenter randomized trial in high risk metastatic breast cancer (MBC). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology A-284, 74a, 2000.
Loibl S, von Minckwitz G, Souchon R, et al.: Phase I/II study with mitoxantrone (N) vs. NDOC in patients with high risk locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A512, 1999.