Mitoxantrone With or Without Docetaxel in Treating Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00002544|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 27, 2003
Last Update Posted : August 2, 2013
Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Internistische Onkologie
Information provided by:
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
No Study Results Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov for this Study
|Recruitment Status :||Completed|
|Primary Completion Date :||No date given|
|Actual Study Completion Date :||November 2002|
Publications of Results:
Heidemann E, Stoeger H, Souchon R, Hirschmann WD, Bodenstein H, Oberhoff C, Fischer JT, Schulze M, Clemens M, Andreesen R, Mahlke M, König M, Scharl A, Fehnle K, Kaufmann M. Is first-line single-agent mitoxantrone in the treatment of high-risk metastatic breast cancer patients as effective as combination chemotherapy? No difference in survival but higher quality of life were found in a multicenter randomized trial. Ann Oncol. 2002 Nov;13(11):1717-29.
Heidemann E, Souchon R, Stoger H, et al.: First-line monochemotherapy with mitoxantrone versus combination with fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in high-risk metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial. Onkologie 23(1): 54-59, 2000.
Heidemann E, Stoeger H, Souchon R, et al.: Balance of time to progression, quality of life, and overall survival: more gain from treatment in single agent treatment with mitoxantrone (N) than with the combination of fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC). Results of a multicenter randomized trial in high risk metastatic breast cancer (MBC). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology A-284, 74a, 2000.
Loibl S, von Minckwitz G, Souchon R, et al.: Phase I/II study with mitoxantrone (N) vs. NDOC in patients with high risk locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A512, 1999.