Working...
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 42 of 62 for:    "Sick Sinus Syndrome"

Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Study (RVOTCARE)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01294839
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : February 14, 2011
Last Update Posted : February 4, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Abbott Medical Devices

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE February 10, 2011
First Posted Date  ICMJE February 14, 2011
Last Update Posted Date February 4, 2019
Study Start Date  ICMJE March 2011
Actual Primary Completion Date June 2016   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: February 10, 2011)
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [ Time Frame: 18 months ]
To demonstrate:
  • Whether RVOTs pacing is superior to right ventricular apical pacing in preserving left ventricular systolic function in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and standard indications for pacing(sinus node dysfunction)
  • Whether RVOTs pacing is not inferior to AAI pacing in preserving left ventricular systolic function in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and sinus node dysfunction.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Same as current
Change History Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01294839 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: February 10, 2011)
left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) [ Time Frame: 18 months ]
To demonstrate:
  • Whether RVOTs pacing is superior to right ventricular apical pacing in avoiding adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and standard indications for pacing(sinus node dysfunction)
  • Whether RVOTs pacing is not inferior to AAI pacing in avoiding adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and sinus node dysfunction.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE Same as current
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Study
Official Title  ICMJE Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Septal Pacing for Cardiac Dysfunction Prevention Evaluation
Brief Summary This is a prospective, randomized, double blinded, multi-center, controlled study to evaluate the clinical impact at 18 months after DDD implantation of alternative pacing site (RVOTs and RVA) and the different conduction path (RVOTs and AV node) on cardiac dysfunction prevention.
Detailed Description

Ventricular pacing is unavoidable in many patients because of unreliable or absent AV conduction, or permanent AF. In recognition of this need, interest has focused on alternative site(s) ventricular pacing to maximize pumping function. These sites include the RV septum, His bundle, various LV sites, and combination of LV and RV (biventricular [BiV]). The RV outflow tract septum (RVOTs) seems to be the most promising site within the RV.

However, small enrollment and inconsistent experimental methods hinder the interpretation of these studies. Locations of alternative pacing sites were not clearly specified, were largely topographic, and lacked consistent anatomic designation. And what is more, there was no prospective, double-blind randomized, multi-center clinical trial which is design to test whether RVOTs pacing is superior to right ventricular apical pacing in preserving left ventricular systolic function and avoiding adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and standard indications for pacing (sinus node dysfunction) in China. There was also no prospective, double-blind randomized, multi-center clinical trial which is design to test whether RVOTs pacing is not inferior to AAIR pacing in preserving left ventricular systolic function and avoiding adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and sinus node dysfunction in the world.

So SJM China will sponsor a prospective, randomized, double blinded, multi-center, controlled study to evaluate the clinical impact at 18 months after DDD implantation of alternative pacing site (RVOTs and RVA) and the different conduction path (RVOTs and AV node) on cardiac dysfunction prevention.

Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Not Applicable
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE Sinus-node Dysfunction
Intervention  ICMJE Device: Right ventricular lead location
RV leads in RVOTs group will be located in right ventricular outflow tract septum, RV leads in the other two group will be implanted in right ventricular apex, for the last RVOTs and RVA groups, the accumulated ventricular pacrouping percentage should be over 80% by adjusting AV delays.
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: RVOTs
    555 Patients will be randomized to three groups(RVOTs, RVA, AAI) in 1:1:1, 185 patients in RVOTs arm, the RV lead of this group patients will be implanted in right ventricular outflow tract septum,the accumulated ventricular pacing percentage should be over 80% by adjusting AV delays.
    Intervention: Device: Right ventricular lead location
  • Experimental: AAI
    555 Patients will be randomized to three groups(RVOTs, RVA, AAI) in 1:1:1, 185 patients in AAI arm, the RV lead of this group patients will be implanted in right ventricular apex.
    Intervention: Device: Right ventricular lead location
  • Active Comparator: RVA
    555 Patients will be randomized to three groups(RVOTs, RVA, AAI) in 1:1:1, 185 patients in RVA arm, the RV lead of this group patients will be implanted in right ventricular apex, the accumulated ventricular pacing percentage should be over 80% by adjusting AV delays.
    Intervention: Device: Right ventricular lead location
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Completed
Actual Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: May 8, 2015)
380
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: February 10, 2011)
555
Actual Study Completion Date  ICMJE June 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date June 2016   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with only sinus-node dysfunction and meet pacing indication
  • Patients with LVEF≥60% and with ventricular synchrony.
  • Patients signed the written informed consent for the study
  • Patients can endure the required follow up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with atrial fibrillation
  • Patients with atrial-ventricular block
  • Patients with LBBB
  • Patients with significant valvular disease
  • Patients with severe hematopathy or severe renal inadequacy
  • Patients with life expectancy < 1.5 year
  • Patients who are in the period of pregnant or lactation
  • Patients who are younger than 18 years old
  • Patients who are ongoing other devices or agents study
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE China
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT01294839
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE CR-10-016-AP-LV
Has Data Monitoring Committee Yes
U.S. FDA-regulated Product Not Provided
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE Not Provided
Responsible Party Abbott Medical Devices
Study Sponsor  ICMJE Abbott Medical Devices
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE Not Provided
PRS Account Abbott Medical Devices
Verification Date January 2019

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP