August 9, 2021
|
August 10, 2021
|
February 16, 2023
|
September 27, 2021
|
October 17, 2023 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
The total nasal polyps score (NPS) is the sum of the right and left nostrils, ranging from 0 (no polyps) to 8 (large polyps causing complete obstruction).
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
The UPSIT score ranges from 0 to 40, with 40 being the best possible score.
|
Same as current
|
|
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in the loss of smell score of the CRSwNP Nasal Symptom Diary [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
Loss of smell scores are scored from 0 ('No symptoms') to 3 ('Severe symptoms').
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in the nasal congestion (NC) score of the CRSwNP Nasal Symptom Diary [ Time Frame: Baseline to week 24 ]
NC scores are scored from 0 ('No symptoms') to 3 ('Severe symptoms').
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in pre--bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (volume of air in liters).
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in Total Symptom Score (TSS) derived from the CRSwNP Nasal Symptom Diary [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
TSS ranges from 0 to 9. Higher scores on the TSS indicate greater symptom severity.
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in 22-Item Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
SNOT-22 is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire. Score ranges from 0 to 110 with higher score indicating greater rhinosinusitis related health burden.
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in SNOT-22 nasal domain score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
SNOT-22 is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire. Nasal domain score ranges from 0-40 with high score representing higher disease burden.
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow (NPIF) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
Nasal Peak Inspiratory flow (nasal flow in liter per minute).
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in rhinosinusitis visual analogue scale (VAS) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
Severity of the rhinosinusitis from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe symptom.
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in 7-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
Asthma control with 6 questions plus FEV1 measure. Score ranges from 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicates lower asthma control.
- Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 36 ]
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
- Incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 36 ]
Incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESIs).
|
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in the loss of smell score of the CRSwNP Nasal Symptom Diary [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
Loss of smell scores are scored from 0 ('No symptoms') to 3 ('Severe symptoms').
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in the nasal congestion (NC) score of the CRSwNP Nasal Symptom Diary [ Time Frame: Baseline to week 24 ]
NC scores are scored from 0 ('No symptoms') to 3 ('Severe symptoms').
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
Pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (volume of air in liters).
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in Total Symptom Score (TSS) derived from the CRSwNP Nasal Symptom Diary [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
TSS ranges from 0 to 9. Higher scores on the TSS indicate greater symptom severity.
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in 22-Item Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
SNOT-22 is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire. Score ranges from 0 to 110 with higher score indicating greater rhinosinusitis related health burden.
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in SNOT-22 nasal domain score [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
SNOT-22 is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire. Nasal domain score ranges from 0-40 with high score representing higher disease burden.
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in Nasal Peak Inspiratory Flow (NPIF) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
Nasal Peak Inspiratory flow (nasal flow in liter per minute).
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in rhinosinusitis visual analogue scale (VAS) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
Severity of the rhinosinusitis from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe symptom.
- Change from baseline to Week 24 in 7-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 ]
Asthma control with 6 questions plus FEV1 measure. Score ranges from 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled). Higher score indicates lower asthma control.
- Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 36 ]
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).
- Incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 36 ]
Incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESIs).
|
Not Provided
|
Not Provided
|
|
EValuating trEatment RESponses of Dupilumab Versus Omalizumab in Type 2 Patients
|
A Randomized, Double-blind, Head-to-head Comparison of Dupilumab Versus Omalizumab in Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) and Comorbid Asthma Patients
|
Primary Objective
-To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab compared to omalizumab in reducing the polyp size and improving sense of smell
Secondary Objectives
- To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving CRSwNP symptoms at Week 24 compared to omalizumab
- To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving lung function at Week 24 compared to omalizumab
- To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving CRSwNP total symptom score (TSS) at Week 24 compared to omalizumab
- To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on health related quality of life (HRQoL) at week 24 compared to omalizumab
- To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving nasal peak inspiratory flow at Week 24 compared to omalizumab
- To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on CRSwNP overall disease severity at Week 24 compared to omalizumab
- To evaluate the effect of dupilumab on asthma control at Week 24 compared to omalizumab
- To evaluate the safety of dupilumab and omalizumab
|
Study duration per participant will be 38 weeks. The study will comprise 3 periods: 28 days ± 3 days screening and run-in period; 24 weeks Randomized investigational medicinal product (IMP) intervention period; up to 12 weeks follow-up period.
|
Interventional
|
Phase 4
|
Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Masking Description: Placebo injections will be administered as needed to blind the number of active dupilumab and omalizumab injections Primary Purpose: Treatment
|
- Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
- Asthma
|
- Drug: Dupilumab
solution for injection subcutaneous
Other Name: SAR231893 Dupixent
- Drug: Omalizumab
solution for injection subcutaneous
Other Name: Xolair
- Drug: Placebo
solution for injection subcutaneous
|
|
De Prado Gomez PharmD MSc L, Khan Mbbs Mph AH, Peters Md AT, Bachert Md PhD C, Wagenmann Md M, Heffler Md PhD E, Hopkins BMBCh C, Hellings Md PhD PW, Zhang PhD M, Xing PhD J, Rowe Md P, Jacob-Nara Md Mph DHSc JA. Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab Versus Omalizumab in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps and Asthma: EVEREST Trial Design. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 Nov;36(6):788-795. doi: 10.1177/19458924221112211. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
|
|
Recruiting
|
422
|
Same as current
|
February 7, 2024
|
October 17, 2023 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply:
- Participants who have undergone any sinus intranasal surgery (including polypectomy) within 6 months before Visit 1.
- Participants who have had a sino-nasal surgery changing the lateral wall structure of the nose, making impossible the evaluation of NPS.
- Participants with conditions/concomitant diseases making them non evaluable at Visit 1 or for the primary efficacy endpoint such as: Antrochoanal polyps, Nasal septal deviation that would occlude at least one nostril, Acute sinusitis, nasal infection, or upper respiratory infection.
- Severe asthma exacerbation requiring treatment with SCS in the last 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and during screening.
- Severe concomitant illness(es) that, in the Investigator's judgment, would adversely affect the participant's participation in the study
- Diagnosed with, suspected of, or at high risk of endoparasitic infection, and/or use of antiparasitic drugs within 2 weeks before Visit 1 (screening visit) or during the screening and run-in period.
- History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive HIV 1/2 serology at Visit 1 (screening visit).
- Known or suspected immunodeficiency, including history of invasive opportunistic infections
- Active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years before Visit 1 (screening visit), except completely treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix and completely treated and resolved non metastatic squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
- History of systemic hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis to dupilumab and omalizumab, including any excipient
- Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks before Visit 1 (screening visit).
The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
|
Sexes Eligible for Study: |
All |
|
18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
|
No
|
Contact: Trial Transparency email recommended (Toll free number for US & Canada) |
800-633-1610 ext option 6 |
Contact-US@sanofi.com |
|
|
Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States
|
|
|
NCT04998604
|
LPS16747 2021-000829-27 ( EudraCT Number ) U1111-1255-4713 ( Registry Identifier: ICTRP )
|
No
|
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: |
Yes |
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: |
No |
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: |
Yes |
|
Plan to Share IPD: |
Yes |
Plan Description: |
Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org |
|
Sanofi
|
Same as current
|
Sanofi
|
Same as current
|
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
|
Not Provided
|
Sanofi
|
February 13, 2023
|