Comparison of Non-invasive Oxygenation Strategies in Patients Admitted for Covid-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (SONIC-19)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04725084 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : January 26, 2021
Last Update Posted : February 9, 2023
|
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date | January 21, 2021 | ||||
First Posted Date | January 26, 2021 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | February 9, 2023 | ||||
Actual Study Start Date | July 1, 2020 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | December 15, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures |
Refractory hypoxemia [ Time Frame: Through Intensive Care Unit stay, an average of 15 days ] Rate of refractory hypoxemia outcome defined by invasive Mechanical Ventilation (endotracheal intubation) requirement or death of non-intubated patients because of therapeutical limitation
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures | Same as current | ||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures | Same as current | ||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title | Comparison of Non-invasive Oxygenation Strategies in Patients Admitted for Covid-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | ||||
Official Title | Comparison of Non-invasive Oxygenation Strategies in ICU Patients Admitted for Covid-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | ||||
Brief Summary | Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is the main clinical presentation of SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) infected patients admitted in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). During the first phase of the outbreak (between February and May 2020), the use of invasive Mechanical Ventilation (MV) was largely required with 63% of ICU patients intubated in the first 24 hours after admission and up to 80% of patients during the overall ICU stay. Mortality was especially higher when using MV in the first 24 hours. In contrast, the use of non-invasive oxygenation strategies in the first 24 hours was only 19% for High Flow Nasal Cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) and 6% for Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV). Several non-invasive oxygenation strategies were proposed in order to delay or avoid MV in ICU patients suffering from Covid-19 ARDS. The use of HFNC became the recommended oxygenation strategy, based in particular on publications prior to the outbreak. The use of NIV or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) combined with HFNC have also been proposed. Although these non-invasive oxygenation strategies seem widely used in the second phase of the outbreak, they have not yet confirmed their clinical impact on MV requirement and patient's outcome. Moreover, no comparison has been made between these different non-invasive oxygenation strategies. The aim of this study is to compare different non-invasive oxygenation strategies (HFNC, NIV, CPAP) on MV requirement and outcome in ICU patients treated for ARDS related to Covid-19. |
||||
Detailed Description | Retrospective multicenter observational registry in French intensive care unit including all consecutive patients admitted for acute respiratory distress syndrome related to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia between1st July and 31th December 2020. Patients characteristics, ICU treatments and outcome will be recorded. |
||||
Study Type | Observational | ||||
Study Design | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Retrospective |
||||
Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | ||||
Biospecimen | Not Provided | ||||
Sampling Method | Non-Probability Sample | ||||
Study Population | All consecutive patients admitted in intensive care unit for an acute respiratory distress syndrome related to a documented SARS-CoV-2 disease | ||||
Condition | Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) | ||||
Intervention |
|
||||
Study Groups/Cohorts |
|
||||
Publications * |
|
||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status | Completed | ||||
Actual Enrollment |
355 | ||||
Original Actual Enrollment |
300 | ||||
Actual Study Completion Date | December 15, 2020 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | December 15, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender |
|
||||
Ages | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||
Contacts | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
Listed Location Countries | France | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number | NCT04725084 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers | 2021-CHITS-001 | ||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement |
|
||||
Current Responsible Party | Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer | ||||
Original Responsible Party | Same as current | ||||
Current Study Sponsor | Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer | ||||
Original Study Sponsor | Same as current | ||||
Collaborators | Not Provided | ||||
Investigators |
|
||||
PRS Account | Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer | ||||
Verification Date | October 2022 |