We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Comparison of Non-invasive Oxygenation Strategies in Patients Admitted for Covid-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (SONIC-19)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04725084
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 26, 2021
Last Update Posted : February 9, 2023
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date January 21, 2021
First Posted Date January 26, 2021
Last Update Posted Date February 9, 2023
Actual Study Start Date July 1, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date December 15, 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: January 25, 2021)
Refractory hypoxemia [ Time Frame: Through Intensive Care Unit stay, an average of 15 days ]
Rate of refractory hypoxemia outcome defined by invasive Mechanical Ventilation (endotracheal intubation) requirement or death of non-intubated patients because of therapeutical limitation
Original Primary Outcome Measures Same as current
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: January 25, 2021)
  • Mechanical Ventilation free days [ Time Frame: Through Intensive Care Unit stay, up to 1 month ]
    Numbers of days without invasive mechanical ventilation during ICU stay and until ICU discharge
  • Survival at ICU discharge [ Time Frame: At the moment of Intensive care unit discharge, up to 1 month ]
    Rate of patients alive at the moment of intensive care unit discharge
  • ICU length of stay [ Time Frame: At the moment of Intensive care unit discharge, up to 1 month ]
    Number of days spent in Intensive care unit
  • Complications during ICU stay [ Time Frame: Through Intensive Care Unit stay, up to 1 month ]
    Number of complications during intensive care unit stay: pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum
  • Delay between admission and intubation [ Time Frame: Through Intensive Care Unit stay, up to 1 month ]
    Period of time (in hours or days) between admission in Intensive Care Unit and intubation requirement with invasive mechanical ventilation.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures Same as current
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title Comparison of Non-invasive Oxygenation Strategies in Patients Admitted for Covid-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Official Title Comparison of Non-invasive Oxygenation Strategies in ICU Patients Admitted for Covid-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Brief Summary

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is the main clinical presentation of SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) infected patients admitted in Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

During the first phase of the outbreak (between February and May 2020), the use of invasive Mechanical Ventilation (MV) was largely required with 63% of ICU patients intubated in the first 24 hours after admission and up to 80% of patients during the overall ICU stay. Mortality was especially higher when using MV in the first 24 hours. In contrast, the use of non-invasive oxygenation strategies in the first 24 hours was only 19% for High Flow Nasal Cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) and 6% for Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV).

Several non-invasive oxygenation strategies were proposed in order to delay or avoid MV in ICU patients suffering from Covid-19 ARDS. The use of HFNC became the recommended oxygenation strategy, based in particular on publications prior to the outbreak. The use of NIV or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) combined with HFNC have also been proposed. Although these non-invasive oxygenation strategies seem widely used in the second phase of the outbreak, they have not yet confirmed their clinical impact on MV requirement and patient's outcome. Moreover, no comparison has been made between these different non-invasive oxygenation strategies.

The aim of this study is to compare different non-invasive oxygenation strategies (HFNC, NIV, CPAP) on MV requirement and outcome in ICU patients treated for ARDS related to Covid-19.

Detailed Description

Retrospective multicenter observational registry in French intensive care unit including all consecutive patients admitted for acute respiratory distress syndrome related to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia between1st July and 31th December 2020.

Patients characteristics, ICU treatments and outcome will be recorded.

Study Type Observational
Study Design Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Retrospective
Target Follow-Up Duration Not Provided
Biospecimen Not Provided
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Study Population All consecutive patients admitted in intensive care unit for an acute respiratory distress syndrome related to a documented SARS-CoV-2 disease
Condition Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
Intervention
  • Other: Use of High Flow Nasal Cannula alone
    Use of high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy alone
  • Other: Use of Non-invasive Ventilation
    Use of non-invasive ventilation combined or not with high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy
  • Other: Use of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
    Use of continuous positive airway pressure combined or not with high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy
Study Groups/Cohorts
  • High Flow Nasal Cannula oxygen therapy treatment
    Patients treated only by high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy
    Intervention: Other: Use of High Flow Nasal Cannula alone
  • Non-Invasive Ventilation treatment
    Patients treated by non-invasive ventilation (combined or not with HFNC)
    Intervention: Other: Use of Non-invasive Ventilation
  • Continuous Positive Airway Pressure treatment
    Patients treated by continuous positive airway pressure (combined or not with HFNC)
    Intervention: Other: Use of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Publications *

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status Completed
Actual Enrollment
 (submitted: February 1, 2022)
355
Original Actual Enrollment
 (submitted: January 25, 2021)
300
Actual Study Completion Date December 15, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date December 15, 2020   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients admitted in intensive care unit because of a SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by PCR wherever was collected the analyzed sample
  • acute respiratory distress syndrome according to Berlin criteria
  • age superior or equal to 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient opposition to participate in the study
  • patients under judicial protection measures
Sex/Gender
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers No
Contacts Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries France
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number NCT04725084
Other Study ID Numbers 2021-CHITS-001
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD: No
Current Responsible Party Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer
Original Responsible Party Same as current
Current Study Sponsor Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer
Original Study Sponsor Same as current
Collaborators Not Provided
Investigators
Study Director: Jonathan Chelly, MD Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon La Seyne sur Mer
PRS Account Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer
Verification Date October 2022