Comparison of Two Routes of Administration of a Multimodal Analgesic Protocol in Postoperative Cesarean Section
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03626753 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : August 13, 2018
Last Update Posted : August 15, 2018
|
Tracking Information | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | July 31, 2018 | ||||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | August 13, 2018 | ||||||
Last Update Posted Date | August 15, 2018 | ||||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | January 1, 2015 | ||||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | June 30, 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain [ Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative ] from 0 - 10 (with 0 being no pain and 10 being the most severe pain imaginable) at rest and coughing or mobilization
|
||||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Change History | |||||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||
Descriptive Information | |||||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Comparison of Two Routes of Administration of a Multimodal Analgesic Protocol in Postoperative Cesarean Section | ||||||
Official Title ICMJE | Comparison of Two Routes of Administration of a Multimodal Analgesic Protocol in Postoperative Cesarean Section Oral vs Intravenous | ||||||
Brief Summary | Many drugs with various mechanisms of action are used for postcaesarean pain relief. Although the response to pain relief is sometimes believed to be individual, it is very important to establish the most effective with the least adverse effects type of oral analgesia for women after caesarean section. Optimal pain control post-caesarean section will benefit not only the mother and her baby, but also a healthcare system. Optimal pain control may shorten the time spent in hospital after caesarean section and, therefore, reduce healthcare costs. | ||||||
Detailed Description | Pain after cesarean section (CS), usually described as strong, is an obstacle to good mother-child interaction and post-operative rehabilitation. Its management is important for a quick recovery and allow the mother to take care and link with her newborn. Currently, intrathecal opioids are the most commonly used technique and provide the foundation for post-cesarean analgesia. This technique combined with multimodal analgesia reduces the doses of morphine consumed, including these side effects. Spinal anesthesia is the standard anesthetic technique for caesarean section; it offers several advantages including the possibility of prescribing oral analgesics. An ideal analgesic protocol is one that is simple to implement, cost-effective, and has minimal impact on the work staff. It would have a good safety profile, a low incidence of side effects and complications, and respond to wide inter-patient variability. It relieves the mother of high quality pain while having minimal interference with her, newborn care and anesthesia while allowing safe breastfeeding. The aim of this work is to compare the quality of an multimodal oral analgesia with intravenous analgesia and to demonstrate non-inferiority of the oral route pain relieve in postoperative caesarean section period. The secondary objectives was to evaluate the maternal tolerance of the drugs (piroxicam, nefopam, paracetamol) used postoperatively of a caesarean section. |
||||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Phase 2 Phase 3 |
||||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||
Condition ICMJE |
|
||||||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||||
Publications * |
|
||||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||
Recruitment Information | |||||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
200 | ||||||
Original Actual Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | June 30, 2015 | ||||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | June 30, 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Tunisia | ||||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||||
Administrative Information | |||||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03626753 | ||||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | CMNMonastir | ||||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||||
Current Responsible Party | Fethi Jebali, Centre de Maternité de Monastir | ||||||
Original Responsible Party | Same as current | ||||||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | Centre de Maternité de Monastir | ||||||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||
Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||
PRS Account | Centre de Maternité de Monastir | ||||||
Verification Date | August 2018 | ||||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |