Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening Before Copper Intrauterine Device Removal
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03600064 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : July 26, 2018
Last Update Posted : September 16, 2020
|
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | July 17, 2018 | ||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | July 26, 2018 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | September 16, 2020 | ||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | July 1, 2019 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | July 1, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
The degree of pain perception immediate after intrauterine device removal measured by Visual analogue scale [ Time Frame: 1 minute ] visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 score (0 means no pain, 10 means maximum pain)
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Visual analogue scale score (VAS) immediate after intrauterine device removal [ Time Frame: 1 minute ] | ||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening Before Copper Intrauterine Device Removal | ||||
Official Title ICMJE | Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening Before Copper Intrauterine Device Removal in Women Delivered Only by Elective Cesarean Section | ||||
Brief Summary | Intrauterine devices are the most common used method of contraception in the world, mostly in developing countries, because they offer long-term, reversible and relatively safe contraception. At present, 50% of intrauterine devices users are women of reproductive age and most of them are requesting Intrauterine device removal to regain their fertility. In general, an intrauterine device should be removed during menses or preferably immediate after menses because intrauterine device removal is usually easy because the cervix is still soft. The intrauterine device is usually removed by firmly grasping the threads at the external os; traction should be applied away from the cervix. If resistance is present, the removal should be stopped until it is determined why the intrauterine device is not moving. Some deeply embedded intrauterine device may need to be removed by hysteroscope [4]. In practice, many women, however, have an intolerable pain during intrauterine device removal and some of them requesting painkiller or even anesthesia to allow the physician to remove it. Cervical hardening and adhesions are the major factors making IUD removal difficult especially in post-menopausal women. Insertion and removal of IUD in nulliparous women is possible but it may carry more pain, more difficulty than in parous women. We think that this problem is also present in women has no vagina delivery before. So, the intrauterine device removal actually has some difficulty or pain in the nulliparous women, women delivered by elective caesarian section or postmenopausal women. Many medical agents for cervical ripening prior to the removal have been emerged like misoprostol. Misoprostol is commonly used for cervical ripening in the first and second trimester miscarriage and prior intrauterine devices insertion. The use of vaginal misoprostol before intrauterine device insertion in women who had never delivered vaginally before may increase the ease and success of insertion with pain felt during the procedure . However and up to our knowledge; no studies had been reported the effect of misoprostol on removal pain in women delivered only by elective cesarean section. |
||||
Detailed Description | Not Provided | ||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Prevention |
||||
Condition ICMJE | Intrauterine Device | ||||
Intervention ICMJE | Drug: Misoprostol
the women will be received two tablets of misoprostol 400 mcg vaginally before IUD removal (Misotac®; Sigma Pharma, SAE, Egypt).
|
||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
80 | ||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | September 1, 2020 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | July 1, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years to 45 Years (Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | Yes | ||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Egypt | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03600064 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | MIUD | ||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||
Current Responsible Party | Mohammed Khairy Ali, Assiut University | ||||
Original Responsible Party | Same as current | ||||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | Assiut University | ||||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
Investigators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
PRS Account | Assiut University | ||||
Verification Date | September 2020 | ||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |