POstopeRative Standardization of Care: THe Implementation of Best Practice After Pancreatic Resection (PORSCH)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03400280 |
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified June 2019 by HC van Santvoort, St. Antonius Hospital.
Recruitment status was: Recruiting
First Posted : January 17, 2018
Last Update Posted : June 14, 2019
|
Tracking Information | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | December 21, 2017 | ||||||||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | January 17, 2018 | ||||||||||
Last Update Posted Date | June 14, 2019 | ||||||||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | January 8, 2018 | ||||||||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | November 9, 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Composite primary endpoint [ Time Frame: 90 days after index pancreatic resection ] The primary endpoint of this trial is a composite of the most severe complications associated to postoperative pancreatic fistula. This endpoint will be considered positive if one of the following complications occurs within 90 days after pancreatic resection: late postpancreatectomy bleeding, new-onset organ failure and/or death
|
||||||||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||
Change History | |||||||||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||||||
Descriptive Information | |||||||||||
Brief Title ICMJE | POstopeRative Standardization of Care: THe Implementation of Best Practice After Pancreatic Resection | ||||||||||
Official Title ICMJE | POstopeRative Standardization of Care: THe Implementation of Best Practice After Pancreatic Resection. a Nationwide Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial | ||||||||||
Brief Summary | This Nationwide stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial is designed to evaluate if the implementation of a best practice algorithm for postoperative care results in a decrease in incidence of major complications and death after pancreatic resection as compared to current practice. | ||||||||||
Detailed Description | Rationale Pancreatic resection is a major abdominal operation with 50% chance of postoperative complications. A feared complication is severe pancreatic fistula, in which there is leakage of enzyme rich fluid into the abdominal cavity. Adequate complication management appears to be the most important factor in improving outcomes of patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Objective To investigate whether implementation of a best practice algorithm for postoperative care focusing on early detection and step-up management of postoperative pancreatic fistula results in a lower rate of major complications and death after pancreatic resection as compared to current practice Study design A nationwide stepped-wedge, cluster randomized, superiority trial. In this design all participating centers cross over from current practice to best practice according to the algorithm, but are randomized to determine the exact order. At the end of the trial, all centers will have implemented the best practice algorithm. Study population All centers performing pancreatic surgery in the Netherlands (i.e. the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group). Intervention Cluster level education on postoperative care according to a best practice algorithm, focusing on early detection and step-up management of postoperative pancreatic fistula. This algorithm is based on findings in Dutch observational cohort studies, systematic literature analyses, an inventory in current protocols on postoperative care and expert opinion. The proposed algorithm is validated in a multicenter cohort and consensus upon this algorithm is reached with pancreatic surgeons from all centers of the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. The final algorithm was reviewed critically by the advisory committee of internationally respected experts in the field of pancreatology before implementation in this trial. Comparison Postoperative care according to current practice. Endpoints The primary outcome was measured in all patients undergoing pancreatic resection and is a composite of major complications (i.e. postpancreatectomy bleeding, new-onset organ failure and death). Secondary endpoints include the individual components of the primary endpoint and other clinical outcomes, number of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, healthcare resource utilization and costs analysis. Follow-up will be 90 days after pancreatic resection. |
||||||||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||||||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Intervention Model Description: Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial Masking: None (Open Label)Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||||||
Condition ICMJE |
|
||||||||||
Intervention ICMJE | Other: Best practice algorithm for postoperative care
See arm/group description
|
||||||||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||||||||
Publications * | Smits FJ, Molenaar IQ, Besselink MG, Busch OR, van Eijck CH, van Santvoort HC; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Management of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: high mortality after completion pancreatectomy: Reply to: Bressan et al. completion pancreatectomy in the acute management of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2018 Dec;20(12):1223. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 Jun 22. No abstract available. | ||||||||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||||||
Recruitment Information | |||||||||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Unknown status | ||||||||||
Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
1600 | ||||||||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||
Estimated Study Completion Date ICMJE | February 9, 2020 | ||||||||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | November 9, 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria for Clusters:
Exclusion Criteria for Clusters:
Inclusion Criteria for Patients:
Exclusion Criteria for Patients:
|
||||||||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||||||||
Ages ICMJE | Child, Adult, Older Adult | ||||||||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | Yes | ||||||||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Netherlands | ||||||||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||||||||
Administrative Information | |||||||||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03400280 | ||||||||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | W17.057 UU2017-8272 ( Other Grant/Funding Number: Dutch Cancer Society (KWF) ) |
||||||||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Not Provided | ||||||||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||||||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||||||||
Current Responsible Party | HC van Santvoort, St. Antonius Hospital | ||||||||||
Original Responsible Party | Same as current | ||||||||||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | St. Antonius Hospital | ||||||||||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Dutch Cancer Society | ||||||||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||||||
PRS Account | St. Antonius Hospital | ||||||||||
Verification Date | June 2019 | ||||||||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |