Working…
Help guide our efforts to modernize ClinicalTrials.gov.
Send us your comments by March 14, 2020.
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Efficacy and Safety of BIIB033 (Opicinumab) as an Add-on Therapy to Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs) in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (AFFINITY)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03222973
Recruitment Status : Active, not recruiting
First Posted : July 19, 2017
Last Update Posted : December 17, 2019
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Biogen

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE July 17, 2017
First Posted Date  ICMJE July 19, 2017
Last Update Posted Date December 17, 2019
Actual Study Start Date  ICMJE November 14, 2017
Estimated Primary Completion Date March 3, 2022   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: April 26, 2019)
  • Overall Response Score [ Time Frame: Part 1: Assessed every 12 weeks from Baseline to Week 72 ]
    Overall Response Score is a multicomponent score based on 4 components: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test in the dominant hand (9HPT-D), and 9HPT in the nondominant hand (9HPT-ND). It assesses overall changes in disability over time. Overall Score ranges from +4 to -4. At each visit, each component is given a score relative to baseline: -1 if threshold is met for worsening, 0 if no changes meet threshold criteria, or +1 if threshold is met for improvement. The thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT are defined by a 15% change from baseline (≥15% decrease from baseline for improvement and ≥15% increase from baseline for worsening). For EDSS, improvement is defined as a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a baseline score of ≤6.0, and worsening is defined as a ≥1-point increase from a baseline score of ≤5.5 or a ≥0.5-point increase from a baseline score equal to 6.0.
  • Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [ Time Frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 ]
    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable andunintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, life-threatening event, requires inpatient hospitalization, significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: July 17, 2017)
Overall Response Score [ Time Frame: Assessed every 12 weeks from Baseline to Week 72 ]
Overall Response Score is a multicomponent score based on 4 components: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), 9-Hole Peg Test in the dominant hand (9HPT-D), and 9HPT in the nondominant hand (9HPT-ND). It assesses overall changes in disability over time. Overall Score ranges from +4 to -4. At each visit, each component is given a score relative to baseline: -1 if threshold is met for worsening, 0 if no changes meet threshold criteria, or +1 if threshold is met for improvement. The thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT are defined by a 15% change from baseline (≥15% decrease from baseline for improvement and ≥15% increase from baseline for worsening). For EDSS, improvement is defined as a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a baseline score of ≤6.0, and worsening is defined as a ≥1-point increase from a baseline score of ≤5.5 or a ≥0.5-point increase from a baseline score equal to 6.0.
Change History Complete list of historical versions of study NCT03222973 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: April 26, 2019)
  • Percentage of Participants with 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND [ Time Frame: Part 1: Assessed every 12 weeks from Baseline to Week 72 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs.
  • Percentage of Participants with 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, or 3-Second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT-3) [ Time Frame: Part 1: Assessed every 12 weeks from Baseline to Week 72 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. The PASAT assesses auditory information processing speed. A random series of numbers from 1 to 9, inclusive, are presented and the participant is instructed to consecutively add pairs of numbers so that each number is added to the one that immediately preceded it. In the 3- second PASAT, numbers are presented at a rate of 1 every 3 seconds.
  • Percentage of Participants with 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND, and without confirmed worsening in any of the 4 assessments during the 72 weeks of the study [ Time Frame: Part 1: Assessed every 12 weeks from Baseline to Week 72 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs.
  • Percentage of Participants with 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) [ Time Frame: Part 1: Assessed every 12 weeks from Baseline to Week 72 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. The SDMT measures the time to pair abstract geometric symbols with specific numbers. The score is the number of correctly coded items from 0-110 in 90 seconds.
  • Percentage of Participants with 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND (20% thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT) [ Time Frame: Part 1: Assessed every 12 weeks from Baseline to Week 72 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs.
  • Overall Response Score [ Time Frame: Part 2: Assessed every 24 weeks from Baseline to Week 96 ]
    Overall Response Score is a multicomponent score based on 4 components: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, and 9HPT-ND. It assesses overall changes in disability over time. Overall Score ranges from +4 to -4. At each visit, each component is given a score relative to baseline: -1 if threshold is met for worsening, 0 if no changes meet threshold criteria, or +1 if threshold is met for improvement. The thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT are defined by a 15% change from baseline (≥15% decrease from baseline for improvement and ≥15% increase from baseline for worsening). For EDSS, improvement is defined as a ≥1.0-point decrease in EDSS from a baseline score of ≤6.0, and worsening is defined as a ≥1-point increase from a baseline score of ≤5.5 or a ≥0.5-point increase from a baseline score equal to 6.0.
  • Percentage of Participants with 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND [ Time Frame: Part 2: Assessed every 24 weeks from Baseline to Week 108 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs.
  • Percentage of Participants with 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, or 3-Second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT-3) [ Time Frame: Part 2: Assessed every 24 weeks from Baseline to Week 108 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. The PASAT assesses auditory information processing speed. A random series of numbers from 1 to 9, inclusive, are presented and the participant is instructed to consecutively add pairs of numbers so that each number is added to the one that immediately preceded it. In the 3- second PASAT, numbers are presented at a rate of 1 every 3 seconds.
  • Percentage of Participants with 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND, and without confirmed worsening in any of the 4 assessments during the 96 weeks of the study [ Time Frame: Part 2: Assessed every 24 weeks from Baseline to Week 96 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs.
  • Percentage of Participants with 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) [ Time Frame: Part 2: Assessed every 24 weeks from Baseline to Week 108 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. The SDMT measures the time to pair abstract geometric symbols with specific numbers. The score is the number of correctly coded items from 0-110 in 90 seconds.
  • Percentage of Participants with 24-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND (20% thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT) [ Time Frame: Part 2: Assessed every 24 weeks from Baseline to Week 108 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs.
  • Percentage of Participants with Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values [ Time Frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 ]
    Laboratory assessments including hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis and serum and urine pregnancy test only for women of childbearing potential, will be evaluated for safety.
  • Percentage of Participants with Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values [ Time Frame: Part 2: Assessed every 12 weeks from Baseline to Week 96 ]
    ECG measurements will be taken for participants for evaluating safety.
  • Percentage of Participants with Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values [ Time Frame: Part 2: Baseline to Week 96 ]
    Vital sign measurements including temperature, pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate will be evaluated for safety.
  • Percentage of Participants with Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Weight Values [ Time Frame: Part 2: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 ]
    Body weight measurements will be taken for participants for evaluating safety.
  • Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score [ Time Frame: Part 2: Assessed every 24 weeks from Baseline to Week 96 ]
    C-SSRS is a suicidal ideation and behavior rating scale. It rates an individual's degree of suicidal ideation on a scale, ranging from "wish to be dead" to "active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent and behaviors". The scale identifies specific behaviors which may be indicative of an individual's intent to complete suicide.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: July 17, 2017)
  • Percentage of Participants with 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND [ Time Frame: Assessed every 12 weeks from Baseline to Week 72 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs.
  • Percentage of Participants with 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, or 3-Second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT-3) [ Time Frame: Assessed every 12 weeks from Baseline to Week 72 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. The PASAT assesses auditory information processing speed. A random series of numbers from 1 to 9, inclusive, are presented and the participant is instructed to consecutively add pairs of numbers so that each number is added to the one that immediately preceded it. In the 3- second PASAT, numbers are presented at a rate of 1 every 3 seconds.
  • Percentage of Participants with 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND, and without confirmed worsening in any of the 4 assessments during the 72 weeks of the study [ Time Frame: Assessed every 12 weeks from Baseline to Week 72 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs.
  • Percentage of Participants with 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, 9HPT-ND, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) [ Time Frame: Assessed every 12 weeks from Baseline to Week 72 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs. The SDMT measures the time to pair abstract geometric symbols with specific numbers. The score is the number of correctly coded items from 0-110 in 90 seconds.
  • Percentage of Participants with 12-week Confirmed Improvement in at least 1 of the Following Assessments: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT-D, or 9HPT-ND (20% thresholds for T25FW and 9HPT) [ Time Frame: Assessed every 12 weeks from Baseline to Week 72 ]
    EDSS measures disability status on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability. Scoring is based on measures of impairment in eight functional systems on examination by a neurologist. The T25FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed walk over 25 feet. The score for the T25FW is averaged between two completed trials. The 9HPT is a quantitative test of upper extremity function that measures the time it takes to place 9 pegs into 9 holes and then remove the pegs.
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE Efficacy and Safety of BIIB033 (Opicinumab) as an Add-on Therapy to Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs) in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Official Title  ICMJE A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study With Optional Open-Label Extension in Subjects With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BIIB033 as an Add-On Therapy to Anti-Inflammatory Disease-Modifying Therapies
Brief Summary

The primary objective of Part 1 of this study is to evaluate the effects of BIIB033 versus placebo on disability improvement over 72 weeks. The primary objective of Part 2 of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety profile of BIIB033 as an add-on therapy in participants with MS.

The secondary objective of Part 1 is to evaluate the effects of BIIB033 versus placebo on additional measures of disability improvement. The secondary objective of Part 2 is to investigate long-term efficacy (disability improvement) and additional safety measures of BIIB033 as an add-on therapy in participants with MS.

Detailed Description Not Provided
Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Phase 2
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE Multiple Sclerosis
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Drug: BIIB033 (opicinumab)
    Administered as specified in the treatment arm
  • Drug: Placebo
    Administered as specified in the treatment arm
Study Arms  ICMJE
  • Experimental: BIIB033 (opicinumab) 750 mg
    Participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) will receive BIIB033 750 milligram (mg) intravenously (IV) as an add-on therapy to a background disease-modifying therapy (DMT) once every 4 weeks over 72 weeks in Part 1 and once every 4 weeks over 96 weeks in Part 2.
    Intervention: Drug: BIIB033 (opicinumab)
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo
    Participants with RMS will receive placebo IV as an add-on therapy to a background DMT once every 4 weeks over 72 weeks in Part 1 and BIIB033 once every 4 weeks over 96 weeks in Part 2. The placebo looks like BIIB033 but does not contain the active ingredient that is thought to have an effect on MS disease. The placebo used in this study is sterile normal saline (water with a small amount of sodium chloride [salt]).
    Intervention: Drug: Placebo
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Active, not recruiting
Actual Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: December 24, 2018)
263
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: July 17, 2017)
240
Estimated Study Completion Date  ICMJE May 26, 2022
Estimated Primary Completion Date March 3, 2022   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Key Inclusion Criteria: Part 1

  • Baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 2.0 to 6.0, have a diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) per the 2010 McDonald's criteria or onset of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) per the Lublin and Reingold criteria, and should have experienced their first MS symptom(s) within the previous 20 years.
  • Subjects must have experienced at least 1 of the following within 24 months prior to Day 1/Baseline: a clinical relapse (but not within 24 weeks prior to Day 1/Baseline), gadolinium-enhancing lesions on brain or spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or new T2 lesion(s) on brain or spinal cord MRI.
  • Subjects must be on a stable dose of a protocol-specified anti-inflammatory disease-modifying therapy (DMT) (IFNβ [Avonex, Plegridy, Betaferon/Betaseron, or Rebif], dimethyl fumarate (DMF) [Tecfidera], or natalizumab [Tysabri]) for at least 24 weeks prior to enrollment.
  • In addition, subjects must have met protocol-defined MRI characteristics using magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences at Screening/Baseline.

Key Inclusion Criteria: Part 2

-Subjects who complete study treatment (BIIB033 or placebo) at Part 1/Week 72 Visit.

Key Exclusion Criteria: Part 1

  • Primary progressive MS
  • An MS relapse that has occurred within 24 weeks prior to Day 1/Baseline or the subject has not stabilized from a previous relapse at the time of Screening.
  • Treatment with any chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, cladribine), cell-depleting monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (e.g., rituximab, ocrelizumab, alemtuzumab), total lymphoid irradiation, T-cell or T-cell receptor vaccination, or teriflunomide within 1 year prior to Day 1/Baseline.
  • Treatment with other anti-inflammatory DMTs (e.g., GA, fingolimod, daclizumab) or plasmapheresis within 24 weeks prior to Day1/Baseline.
  • Treatment with Botox for limb spasticity within 24 weeks before Day 1/Baseline.
  • Contraindications to MRI, for example, presence of pacemakers or other implanted metal devices (excluding dental braces), an allergy to gadolinium renal impairment, or claustrophobia that cannot be medically managed.
  • History of human immunodeficiency virus or other immunodeficient conditions.
  • History of malignancy; however, subjects with a history of excised or treated basal cell carcinoma or fewer than 3 squamous cell carcinomas are eligible to participate in this study.

Key Exclusion Criteria: Part 2

  • Subjects who did not complete study treatment in Part 1/Week 72 Visit
  • Subjects who have a duration >12 weeks between their Part 1/Week 72 Visit and Part 2/Day 1.
  • Contraindications to MRI, for example, presence of pacemakers or other implanted metal devices (excluding dental braces), an allergy to Gd, renal impairment, or claustrophobia that cannot be medically managed.
  • History of human immunodeficiency virus or other immunodeficient conditions not related to DMT treatment.
  • History of malignancy unless enrollment is approved by the Sponsor; subjects with a history of excised or treated basal cell carcinoma or fewer than 3 squamous cell carcinomas are eligible to participate in this study.

NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply

Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 18 Years to 58 Years   (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE Australia,   Belgium,   Canada,   Czechia,   France,   Germany,   Hungary,   Israel,   Italy,   Netherlands,   Poland,   Spain,   Switzerland,   United Kingdom,   United States
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT03222973
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE 215MS202
2017-001224-22 ( EudraCT Number )
Has Data Monitoring Committee Yes
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE Not Provided
Responsible Party Biogen
Study Sponsor  ICMJE Biogen
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE
Study Director: Medical Director Biogen
PRS Account Biogen
Verification Date December 2019

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP