ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Lyme Test Indication Combinations (LyTIC) Study (LyTIC)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03201042
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : June 28, 2017
Last Update Posted : August 21, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Oxford Immunotec

June 21, 2017
June 28, 2017
August 21, 2018
June 8, 2017
December 1, 2018   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Sample Data Analysis [ Time Frame: Tests at different time points post inital presentation will be evaluated through study completion, an average of 1 year. ]
The results will be used to calculate performance, including sensitivity and specificity of the tests under evaluation. The utility of these tests at different time points post initial presentation will be evaluated.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT03201042 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Lyme Test Indication Combinations (LyTIC) Study
Lyme Test Indication Combinations (LyTIC) Study
To establish performance of individual tests and combinations of tests (serological, molecular and cellular tests) in early Lyme infection diagnosis
The present study aims to investigate the performance characteristics of both established and new assays for Borrelia burgdorferi infection and to assess the relative performance of appropriate combinations of these tests. The study will also investigate the effect of the time course of the infection and its treatment on the outcomes for the various tests. Polymerase Chain Reaction(PCR), serology and T cell based tests will be performed. In addition, tests for Babesia, Anaplasma, Ehrlichia and Rickettsia will also be performed as these pathogens can be carried by the same tick that carries Borrelia and may result in coinfection.
Observational
Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Not Provided
Retention:   Samples Without DNA
Description:
whole blood serum
Probability Sample
500 subjects aged 5 years or older.
Lyme Disease
  • Diagnostic Test: PCR based assay

    Whole blood specimens will be tested for the presence of Borrelia DNA by PCR in a two-step test (Imugen). In Cohort 1a and 1b. The first step tests for the presence of any Borrelia DNA. The second step is employed on positive samples and tests for the presence of either B. burgdorferi DNA or B. miyamotoi DNA. Positivity by PCR has a short but early window in the infection cycle for Borrelia burgdorferi and results may enable this window period and diagnosis rates to be better defined.

    In addition co-infection PCR analysis will be performed for the presence of Babesia, Anaplasma or Ehrlichia DNA (Imugen).

  • Diagnostic Test: Serology based assay
    1. The Imugen Lyme Antibody Analysis which includes immunoglobulin M (IgM),immunoglobulin G (IgG), and immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody capture immunoassay and IgG and IgM based Western blots. In Cohort 1a and 1b.
    2. The Immunetics C6 Lyme ELISA assay.
    3. A 2-tier Lyme test performed and interpreted according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Guidelines
    4. A Rickettsia antibody test will be used to identify Spotted Fever and Typhus fever groups infections.

    Lyme test methodologies generally indicate a need to run a combination of tests in order to overcome limitations in either sensitivity or specificity of the various individual tests. Performance of all these tests on the same set of samples should enable both individual and combinatorial performance values to be calculated and compared.

  • Diagnostic Test: Tcell based assay
    A research based ELISpot assay will be performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) extracted from whole blood samples to test for presence of T cells activated against Borrelia antigens. Unlike serology based methods, this signal may not persist over extended periods of time in the absence of Borrelia antigens. The diagnostic window may be different for a test measuring adaptive immune response (i.e. T cells) and thus such test may identify patients with undetectable antibody response and may aid sensitivity of diagnosis.
  • 1a:Lyme patients- Erythema Migrans(EM)rash present
    Patients with newly diagnosed Lyme disease based on the presence of a physician-documented EM rash. PCR, serology and Tcell based assay.
    Interventions:
    • Diagnostic Test: PCR based assay
    • Diagnostic Test: Serology based assay
    • Diagnostic Test: Tcell based assay
  • 1b:Lyme patients no typical EM
    Patients documented symptoms of early Lyme disease, without a typical EM rash present, and the physician's intention to treat for Lyme disease. PCR, serology and Tcell based assay
    Interventions:
    • Diagnostic Test: PCR based assay
    • Diagnostic Test: Serology based assay
    • Diagnostic Test: Tcell based assay
  • Cohort 2: healthy controls
    Patients drawn from Lyme disease non-endemic areas and subjects with known exposure to Lyme disease will be excluded. PCR, serology and Tcell based assay.
    Interventions:
    • Diagnostic Test: PCR based assay
    • Diagnostic Test: Serology based assay
    • Diagnostic Test: Tcell based assay
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruiting
500
Same as current
February 2019
December 1, 2018   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cohort 1a (typical EM and intention to treat):

Inclusion

  1. Documented new onset Lyme disease EM rash (single or multiple) with photographic evidence provided to Oxford Immunotec.
  2. Patient must be able to provide blood sample at the initial visit (prior to treatment initiation) and subsequent samples according to the schedule.
  3. Patients 5 years of age or older, with a minimum weight of 40 pounds.
  4. Patient able to read English and to give consent to study participation.
  5. If patient is younger than 18 years of age a legally authorized representative must provide consent.

Cohort 1b (no typical EM; Lyme disease symptoms; intention to treat):

Inclusion

  1. Patients with suspected Lyme disease, based on physician's examination, where the physician has the intention to treat for Lyme disease (i.e. patients who following initial examination were prescribed treatment for Lyme disease).
  2. Documented new onset of Lyme disease symptoms without a typical EM rash or with no rash. If a rash is present, photographic evidence must be provided.
  3. Patient must be able to provide blood sample at the initial visit (prior to treatment initiation) and subsequent samples according to the schedule.
  4. Patients 5 years of age or older, with a minimum weight of 40 pounds.
  5. Patient able to read English and to give consent to study participation.
  6. If patient is younger than 18 years of age a legally authorized representative must provide consent.

Cohort 2 (Healthy subjects):

Inclusion

  1. Subjects 5 years of age or older, with a minimum weight of 40 pounds.
  2. Subjects never diagnosed with any tick borne disease including Lyme disease
  3. Subjects able to read English and to give consent to study participation.
  4. If subject is younger than 18 years of age a legally authorized representative must provide consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion Cohort 1a (typical EM and intention to treat):

    1. Patients with Lyme-like symptoms lasting longer than 1 month prior to study enrolment.
    2. Patients receiving treatment for any tick borne disease (including Lyme disease) prior to enrolment.
    3. Patients who received a Lyme vaccination.
    4. Patients with anemia defined as a serum hemoglobin <10gm/dL.
    5. Patients who are participating in, or plan to participate in, any investigational drug study.
    6. Patients who are considered unsuitable for the study by the Investigator.

Cohort 1b (no typical EM; Lyme disease symptoms; intention to treat):

  1. Patients with Lyme-like symptoms lasting longer than 1 month prior to study enrolment.
  2. Patients receiving treatment for any tick borne disease (including Lyme disease) prior to enrolment.
  3. Patients who received a Lyme vaccination.
  4. Patients with anemia defined as a serum hemoglobin <10gm/dL.
  5. Patients who are participating in, or plan to participate in, any investigational drug study.
  6. Patients who are considered unsuitable for the study by the Investigator.

Cohort 2 (Healthy subjects):

Exclusion

  1. Subjects with a history of tick bite
  2. Subjects with past or current tick borne disease diagnosis
  3. Subjects at risk for tick borne diseases including Lyme disease
  4. Subjects residing in endemic regions for tick borne diseases: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Wisconsin.
  5. Subjects who have ever visited non-urban areas of endemic regions for tick borne diseases: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Wisconsin.
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
5 Years and older   (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Yes
Contact: Sharon Lynch 508-281-5707 slynch@oxfordimmunotec.com
Contact: Barbara Dimento 508-535-2422 bdimento@oxfordimmunotec.com
United States
 
 
NCT03201042
L3
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA: No
Pediatric Postmarket Surveillance of a Device Product: No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: No
Plan to Share IPD: No
Oxford Immunotec
Oxford Immunotec
Not Provided
Not Provided
Oxford Immunotec
June 2018