Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Dapagliflozin and Saxagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Aged 10 to Below 18 Years Old
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03199053|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : June 26, 2017
Last Update Posted : September 21, 2018
|First Submitted Date ICMJE||June 22, 2017|
|First Posted Date ICMJE||June 26, 2017|
|Last Update Posted Date||September 21, 2018|
|Actual Study Start Date ICMJE||October 11, 2017|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date||October 21, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||Change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 26 [ Time Frame: 26 weeks ]
To determine if there will be a greater mean reduction from baseline in HbA1c achieved after 26 weeks of oral double-blind add-on therapy of dapagliflozin 5 mg or saxagliptin 2.5 mg (with titration to the high-dose for those who do not achieve the glycemic target of HbA1c < 7% at 12 weeks) compared to placebo in pediatric T2DM subjects with HbA1c levels of 6.5 to 10.5% on diet and exercise and metformin (IR or XR), insulin, or metformin (IR or XR) plus insulin.
|Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Same as current|
|Change History||Complete list of historical versions of study NCT03199053 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site|
|Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE
|Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Same as current|
|Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE
|Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Same as current|
|Brief Title ICMJE||Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Dapagliflozin and Saxagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Aged 10 to Below 18 Years Old|
|Official Title ICMJE||A 26 Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Phase 3 Trial With a 26 Week Safety Extension Period Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Dapagliflozin 5 and 10 mg, and Saxagliptin 2.5 and 5 mg in Pediatric Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Are Between 10 and Below 18 Years of Age|
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drugs dapagliflozin and saxagliptin in patients with Type 2 Diabetes who are aged 10 to below 18 years old and are currently taking metformin, insulin, or both drugs.
Dapagliflozin and saxagliptin are both approved for use in patients with Type 2 Diabetes aged 18 years or older. This study will assess how well dapagliflozin and saxagliptin work by finding out how these treatments affect blood glucose (sugar) levels compared to placebo (a pill that contains no active drug), in children and adolescents. Dapagliflozin and saxagliptin are considered investigational products in this study since while they have been approved for use in adults (patients 18 years or older), they haven't been approved for children and adolescents due to lack of clinical studies in this specific population.
Patients with Type 2 Diabetes have higher levels of blood glucose (sugar) than patients who do not have this disease. The high level of sugar in the blood can lead to serious short-term and long-term medical problems. The main goal of treating diabetic patients is to lower blood glucose to a normal level. Lowering and controlling blood glucose help prevent or delay complications of diabetes, such as heart disease, kidney, eye and nerve diseases, and the possibility of amputation.
Dapagliflozin is a drug that helps to reduce blood glucose (sugar) levels by helping the kidneys to remove excess glucose from the blood and excrete it in the urine. It prevents the kidneys from returning glucose from the urine back into the bloodstream.
Saxagliptin increases insulin production when blood glucose levels are high. Insulin is a hormone made by the pancreas that allows the body to use sugar (glucose) from the food that is eaten for energy or to store glucose for future use. Saxagliptin helps to improve blood sugar levels in response to a meal and between meals if blood glucose levels are not lowered effectively. Saxagliptin does not work when the blood glucose is low. Saxagliptin also helps to decrease the amount of sugar made by the body. Together, these processes reduce blood glucose levels and help to control Type 2 Diabetes.
Dapagliflozin (alone or in combination with other antidiabetic drugs) has been shown to be effective in lowering blood glucose in adults with Type 2 Diabetes and is available for use in adults (patients 18 years or older) in approximately 40 countries worldwide including the USA and Europe. Dapagliflozin has not yet been studied in children (pediatric patients).
Saxagliptin (alone or in combination with other antidiabetic drugs) has been shown to be effective in lowering blood glucose in adults with Type 2 Diabetes and is available for use in adults (patients 18 years or older) in approximately 90 countries worldwide. Saxagliptin also has not yet been studied in children (pediatric patients).
The subject will either receive one of the active study drugs or a placebo (a pill that looks identical but contains inactive drug). This study will be double blind; this means that neither the subject, nor the study doctor will know which treatment the subject will receive.
Which treatment the subject receives is decided by a computer, purely by chance; this is called a "random assignment".
For this study, there will first be a screening phase of up to 6 weeks, followed by a 2 week lead in phase. Thereafter there will be a 26 week short-term treatment phase (week 1-week 26), and a 26 week long-term treatment phase (week 27-week 52). Following this there will be a follow-up telephone call on week 56 and a post study visit at week 104.
At day 1 visit after the lead in phase the subject will be randomly assigned to receive one of 3 treatments: dapagliflozin 5 mg, saxagliptin 2.5 mg or placebo in a blinded manner. This treatment will continue up to week 14. Then after week 14, and until the end of the study, the subject will be assigned to receive one of the following 5 treatments: dapagliflozin 5 mg, dapagliflozin 10 mg, saxagliptin 2.5 mg, saxagliptin 5 mg or placebo in a blinded manner. The drugs assigned after week 14 will be the same drugs as at Day 1, but some of the groups will receive them at a higher dose.
After completion of the 26-week short-term phase, the subject will enter a 26 week long-term phase. The same treatment that the subject had been assigned to at week 14 visit will be continued. This long-term phase is primarily designed to provide additional information on how well dapagliflozin and saxagliptin are tolerated.
Following the treatment phases, there will be a follow-up telephone call at week 56.
The subject will be asked to visit the clinic at week 104 again for a final evaluation of the physical development (based on the stage of puberty).
In pediatric Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) subjects on diet and exercise and metformin, or insulin, or metformin and insulin:
The primary research hypothesis for dapagliflozin is whether addition of dapagliflozin, including up-titration if needed, results in a greater mean reduction from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as compared to placebo when each are administered over 26 weeks of oral double-blind add-on treatment.
The primary research hypothesis for saxagliptin is whether addition of saxagliptin, including up-titration if needed, results in a greater mean reduction from baseline in HbA1c as compared to placebo when each are administered over 26 weeks of oral double-blind add-on treatment.
Study Design: The proposed study is a 26-week Phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group study with a 26-week safety extension period to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dapagliflozin (5 mg and 10 mg), and, separately, saxagliptin (2.5 mg and 5 mg) in pediatric subjects with T2DM, and an additional post study visit at Week 104 for assessment of measures of growth and maturity. Approximately 243 pediatric subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive dapagliflozin 5 mg, saxagliptin 2.5 mg, or placebo. Approximately 81 subjects will be randomized to each treatment arm.
After a 26-week, double-blind, ST treatment period, the primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed. This will be followed by a 26-week, site- and subject-blind LT safety extension period. Dapagliflozin and, separately, saxagliptin will be compared against the single shared placebo comparator.
Measures of growth and maturity will be assessed at the Week 104 post study visit.
Subjects will be required to have been treated with diet and exercise and a stable dose of at least 1000 mg metformin (IR or XR) for a minimum of 8 weeks, or a stable baseline dose of insulin for a minimum of 8 weeks, or a stable combination of at least 1000 mg metformin and insulin for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to randomization. At least 50% of subjects will be on a stable baseline dose of metformin, with or without concurrent insulin therapy. At least 30% of total subjects will be between the ages of 10 and 14 years and at least one third, but no more than two thirds, female subjects.
During the 2-week lead-in period, subjects will be instructed on a diet and exercise program (in accordance with the American Diabetes Association [ADA] or similar local guidelines) to be followed for the study duration. Subjects will maintain their baseline types and/or doses of antidiabetic therapy throughout the study (2-week lead-in, 26-week double-blind ST treatment period, and the 26-week blinded safety extension LT treatment period). If applicable, investigators will encourage subjects to keep their insulin doses stable. Down-titration of insulin will be allowed only as necessary to prevent hypoglycemia and will be at the discretion of the Investigator. Home glucose meters to monitor glucose control will be dispensed to subjects and self-blood glucose monitoring (SBGM) requirements and procedures will be explained. Subjects will also be instructed on the use of the subject diary to record self-monitored glucose levels and daily insulin dose, if applicable. Subjects will also receive a blood ketone meter for testing when DKA is suspected.
After the lead-in period, eligible subjects with HbA1c of 6.5% to 10.5% at screening will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive oral, double-blind, dapagliflozin 5 mg (approximately 81 subjects), saxagliptin 2.5 mg (approximately 81 subjects), or placebo (approximately 81 subjects). Randomization will be stratified based on baseline anti-diabetes treatment regimen (stable baseline dose of metformin (IR or XR), a stable baseline dose of insulin, or a stable combination of metformin and insulin), gender, and age (10 to below 15 years of age, 15 to below 18 years of age).
A blinded HbA1c assessment will be performed at Week 12. All subjects with Week 12 HbA1c values < 7% will remain on previously assigned randomized treatment (dapagliflozin 5 mg, or saxagliptin 2.5 mg, or placebo) after the Week 12 assessment. Subjects assigned to the dapagliflozin treatment arm at Day 1 Randomization with Week 12 HbA1c values >= 7% will be re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue on the low-dose treatment (dapagliflozin 5 mg) or up-titrate to the high-dose treatment (dapagliflozin 10 mg) after the Week 12 assessment. Similarly, subjects assigned to the saxagliptin treatment arm at Day 1 Randomization with Week 12 HbA1c values >= 7% will be re randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue on the low-dose treatment (saxagliptin 2.5 mg) or up-titrate to the high-dose treatment (saxagliptin 5 mg) after the Week 12 assessment. Subjects assigned to the placebo treatment arm at Day 1 Randomization with Week 12 HbA1c values >= 7% will continue on placebo treatment. To maintain the blinding of treatments as well as HbA1c results, all placebo subjects and all subjects taking saxagliptin or dapagliflozin with an HbA1c < 7% at week 12 will go through a dummy 2nd randomization process that will be indistinguishable (for the subjects and site personnel) from the actual 2nd randomization. During the Week 14 visit, blinded study drug will be dispensed to all subjects in accordance with new treatment assignments based on Week 12 HbA1c assessments.
After completion of the ST treatment period, all subjects will enter the LT treatment period. All subjects, including those randomized to receive placebo, will continue with their randomized study medication assigned after the Week 12 assessment in the site- and subject blind LT treatment period. Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will be assessed during a Week 56 phone visit.
Subjects who discontinue study drug before the end of the study treatment period will enter a non-treatment, follow up phase, in which subjects will follow their visit schedules with modified assessments until study completion. Subjects will attend a post-study visit at Week 104, for assessment of measures of growth and maturity.
Discontinued subjects will not be replaced. Samples for analysis of plasma levels of dapagliflozin, saxagliptin and its metabolite 5-Hydroxy saxagliptin (5 OH saxagliptin) will be collected pre-dose and approximately 2 hours post-dose (+/- 1 hour) during the Week 6, 12, 20, and 26 visits.
Samples for analysis of plasma glucose will be collected pre-dose during the Day 1 visit, and pre-dose and approximately 2 hours post-dose (+/- 1 hour) during the Week 6, 12, 20, and 26 visits.
Plasma samples for analysis of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) activity will be collected pre-dose during the Day 1 visit, and at 2 (+/-1) hours post-dose during the Week 6, 12, 20, and 26 visits.
All plasma samples will be drawn in the fasting condition. During the course of the trial, subjects may be eligible for the addition of open-label rescue medication to their blinded treatment regimen in order to treat ongoing hyperglycemia. Insulin may be used as rescue, at the Investigator's discretion.
Pre-specified glycemic criteria, based upon self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) FPG, or single central laboratory FPG and repeat confirmatory FPG have been established during the treatment period, starting at Week 6, and up to but not including the Week 52 visit, to determine eligibility for open-label rescue medication.
The sample size for this study was selected to be consistent with the research hypotheses.
Dapagliflozin and saxagliptin will be compared with placebo separately. The Bonferroni method to control the type 1 error rate across two comparisons with respect to the two groups of research hypotheses (dapagliflozin vs placebo and saxagliptin vs placebo) will be used. No comparisons between saxagliptin and dapagliflozin will be performed.
The sample size for this study is based on the ability to detect a 0.5% improvement over placebo for dapagliflozin and saxagliptin in change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 26 (ST) with at least 80% power for each comparison at a two sided alpha level of 0.025. Assuming a standard deviation of 0.9% for change from baseline HbA1c at Week 26, a total of 237 pediatric subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive dapagliflozin 5 mg (79 subjects), saxagliptin 2.5 mg (79 subjects), or placebo (79 subjects) respectively. Assuming that 2% of subjects do not have a baseline and at least one post-baseline assessment, a total of approximately 243 subjects will be randomized. Randomization will be stratified based on the baseline anti-diabetic treatment regimen (stable baseline dose of metformin [IR or XR]), a stable baseline dose of insulin, or a stable combination of metformin [IR or XR] and insulin), gender, and age (10 to below 15 years of age, 15 to below 18 years of age).
The anticipated difference of 0.5% between each study drug (saxagliptin and dapagliflozin) and placebo used in sample size estimation is consistent with estimates that were obtained in adult clinical trials with saxagliptin or dapagliflozin as add on to anti-diabetic medication where the primary endpoint was improvement in HbA1c after 24 weeks treatment. The standard deviation estimate of 0.9% is consistent with estimates obtained in these adult studies as well as with published estimates from pediatric trials of other anti-diabetic medications.
Dapagliflozin and saxagliptin will be summarized separately. A common placebo group will be included in each summary.
In addition, within the analyses of saxagliptin, the overall (combined low-dose and high-dose) efficacy and safety analyses will be repeated for the subgroup of subjects on a stable baseline dose of metformin (IR or XR) (with or without insulin). For these analyses, the saxagliptin treatment regimens will be combined into one group and compared to the (common) placebo group. P values corresponding to subgroup comparisons will be reported for the primary and secondary efficacy endpoints, and will be reported at the nominal significance level.
All efficacy analyses will be performed using the Randomized Subjects Data Set (all randomized subjects who receive at least one dose of study medication during the treatment period) unless otherwise specified.
The following treatment regimens are considered for analysis:
The primary efficacy analysis will be performed using a weighted analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Separate models will be used for saxagliptin and dapagliflozin analyses, and each analysis will include the (common) placebo control. Each model will have terms for baseline value, treatment group, and randomization strata.
For the comparison of the low-dose/high-dose treatment regimen versus placebo, all subjects who had HbA1c<7% at Week 12 and remained on the low-dose will get a weight of one. The subjects who had HbA1c >= 7% at Week 12 and continued on the low-dose will get a weight of 0. The subjects who had HbA1c>= 7% at Week 12 and received the high-dose will have a weight of 2. The subjects who withdrew from the study entirely before the second randomization and all placebo subjects will get a weight of one.
The intent-to-treat (ITT) estimand will be evaluated as the primary estimand. Missing values for Week 26 will be imputed using the multiple imputation method. The details of the imputation method will be presented in the statistical analysis plan. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated based on maximum likelihood for the adjusted mean changes within each treatment group as well as for the differences in adjusted mean changes between treatment groups.
To assess the robustness of the primary efficacy analysis for the change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 26, additional sensitivity analysis may be performed using the Evaluable Subjects Data Set if > 10% of the subjects in any treatment group in the Randomized Subjects Data Set have relevant protocol deviations.
The primary endpoint will also be compared between the low-dose treatment regimen and placebo. In addition, up titrating to high-dose and continuing on low-dose will be compared in the subset of saxagliptin and dapagliflozin subjects who had HbA1c >= 7% at Week 12. These analyses are described under secondary efficacy analyses.
Secondary efficacy analyses will also be performed separately for each drug (saxagliptin and dapagliflozin). For each drug, the following sequential testing order will be employed to control multiplicity of testing for the secondary objectives.
For each drug, weighted ANCOVA analysis will be performed for the change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 26 to compare the placebo and the low-dose treatment regimen. For this analysis, all subjects who had HbA1c < 7% at Week 12 and remained on the low-dose will get a weight of one. The subjects who had HbA1c >= 7% at Week 12 and continued on the low-dose will get a weight of 2. The subjects who had HbA1c >= 7% at Week 12 and received the high-dose will have a weight of 0. The subjects who withdrew from the study entirely before the second randomization and all placebo subjects will get a weight of one.
For subjects on saxagliptin and dapagliflozin and who had HbA1c >= 7% at Week 12, the change from baseline HbA1c at Week 26 (ST) will be compared between the subjects re-randomized to remain on the low-dose and the subjects who are re-randomized to the high- dose using an ANCOVA.
Change from baseline of HbA1c at Week 26 (ST) will be compared also using a repeated measures analysis between overall drug and placebo. For this analysis, both treatment regimens will be combined into one treatment group for each drug.
Change from baseline at Week 26 (ST) in FPG will be analyzed similar to the primary weighted analyses of change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 26.
The proportion of subjects achieving HbA1c < 7.0% at Week 26 (ST) will be analyzed using weighted logistic regression with adjustment for the baseline HbA1c measurement and the randomization strata. Weighting for the subjects will be applied similarly to a weighting in the analysis of change from baseline in HbA1c. Subjects with missing a response at Week 26 will be imputed by dichotomizing the imputed values of HbA1c at Week 26.
The assessment of safety will be based on the analyses of AEs, vital signs, physical examinations, electrocardiograms, hypoglycemia, DKA, safety laboratory evaluations, and measures of growth and maturity. All safety analyses will be performed using the Treated Subjects Data Set. Dapagliflozin and saxagliptin will be summarized separately. Treatment regimens (low-dose or low-dose/high-dose) will be combined for saxagliptin and dapagliflozin to provide the safety summary for overall saxagliptin and overall dapagliflozin compared to placebo. A common placebo group will be included in each summary.
Measures of growth, bone and maturation markers will also be summarized for the combined ST + LT + additional post study visit at Week 104.
Monitoring The Sponsor/designee representatives will review data centrally to identify potential issues to determine a schedule of on-site visits for targeted review of study records.
Representatives of the Sponsor (or designee) must be allowed to visit all study site locations periodically to assess the data quality and study integrity. On site they will review study records and directly compare them with source documents, discuss the conduct of the study with the Investigator, and verify that the facilities remain acceptable.
In addition, the study may be evaluated by the Sponsor (or designee) internal auditors and government inspectors who must be allowed access to Case Report Forms (CRFs), source documents, other study files, and study facilities. The Sponsor (or designee) audit reports will be kept confidential.
The investigator must notify the Sponsor (or designee) promptly of any inspections scheduled by regulatory authorities, and promptly forward copies of inspection reports to the Sponsor/designee.
Records Retention The investigator must retain all study records and source documents for the maximum period required by applicable regulations and guidelines, or institution procedures, or for the period specified by the Sponsor/designee, whichever is longer. The investigator must contact the Sponsor/designee prior to destroying any records associated with the study.
The Sponsor/designee will notify the Investigator when the study records are no longer needed.
If the Investigator withdraws from the study (e.g., relocation, retirement), the records shall be transferred to a mutually agreed upon designee (e.g., another investigator, IRB). Notice of such transfer will be given in writing to the Sponsor/designee.
Study Drug Records
It is the responsibility of the Investigator to ensure that a current disposition record of study drug (inventoried and dispensed) is maintained at the study site to include Investigational Products (IPs). Records or logs must comply with applicable regulations and guidelines and should include:
Case Report Forms An investigator is required to prepare and maintain adequate and accurate case histories designed to record all observations and other data pertinent to the investigation on each individual treated or entered as a control in the investigation. Data that are derived from source documents and reported on the CRF must be consistent with the source documents or the discrepancies must be explained. Additional clinical information may be collected and analyzed in an effort to enhance understanding of product safety. Case report forms may be requested for AEs and/or laboratory abnormalities that are reported or identified during the course of the study.
For sites using the Sponsor/designee's Electronic Data Capture (EDC) tool, electronic CRFs will be prepared for all data collection fields except for fields specific to SAEs and pregnancy, which will be reported on the electronic SAE form and Pregnancy Surveillance Form, respectively. If electronic SAE form is not available, a paper SAE form can be used. Spaces may be left blank only in those circumstances permitted by study-specific CRF completion guidelines provided by the Sponsor/designee.
The confidentiality of records that could identify subjects must be protected, respecting the privacy and confidentiality rules in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirement(s).
The investigator will maintain a signature sheet to document signatures and initials of all persons authorized to make entries and/or corrections on CRFs.
The completed CRF, including any paper or electronic SAE/pregnancy CRFs, must be promptly reviewed, signed, and dated by the Investigator or qualified physician who is a co-investigator and who is delegated this task on the Delegation of Authority Form. For electronic CRFs, review and approval/signature is completed electronically through the Sponsor/designee's EDC tool. The investigator must retain a copy of the CRFs including records of the changes and corrections.
Each individual electronically signing electronic CRFs must meet Sponsor/designee training requirements and must only access the Sponsor/designee's EDC tool using the unique user account provided by the Sponsor/designee. User accounts are not to be shared or reassigned to other individuals.
|Study Type ICMJE||Interventional|
|Study Phase||Phase 3|
|Study Design ICMJE||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Eligible subjects with HbA1c of 6.5% to 10.5% at screening will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive dapagliflozin 5 mg, saxagliptin 2.5 mg, or placebo. Blinded HbA1c assessment will be performed at Week 12. All subjects with Week 12 HbA1c < 7% will remain on previously assigned randomized treatment. Subjects taking dapagliflozin with Week 12 HbA1c ≥ 7% will be re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue on the low-dose treatment (dapagliflozin 5 mg) or up titrate to the high-dose treatment (dapagliflozin 10 mg). Subjects taking saxagliptin with Week 12 HbA1c ≥ 7% will be re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue on the low-dose treatment (saxagliptin 2.5 mg) or up-titrate to the high-dose treatment (saxagliptin 5 mg). Subjects taking placebo with Week 12 HbA1c ≥ 7% will continue on placebo treatment. All placebo subjects and all subjects taking saxagliptin or dapagliflozin with HbA1c < 7% at Week 12 will go through a dummy 2nd randomization process for maintaining the blinding.Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
sponsorPrimary Purpose: Treatment
|Condition ICMJE||Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2|
|Publications *||Not Provided|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
|Recruitment Status ICMJE||Recruiting|
|Estimated Enrollment ICMJE
|Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE||Same as current|
|Estimated Study Completion Date||September 22, 2021|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date||October 21, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Eligibility Criteria ICMJE||
|Ages||10 Years to 18 Years (Child, Adult)|
|Accepts Healthy Volunteers||No|
|Listed Location Countries ICMJE||Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Finland, India, Italy, Korea, Republic of, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States|
|Removed Location Countries|
|NCT Number ICMJE||NCT03199053|
|Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE||D1680C00019
2015-005042-66 ( EudraCT Number )
|Has Data Monitoring Committee||Yes|
|U.S. FDA-regulated Product||
|IPD Sharing Statement||
|Study Sponsor ICMJE||AstraZeneca|
|Collaborators ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Investigators ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Verification Date||September 2018|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP