Video Information Provider for HIV-Associated Non-AIDS (VIP-HANA) Symptoms (VIP-HANA)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03182738 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : June 9, 2017
Results First Posted : December 13, 2019
Last Update Posted : December 13, 2019
|
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Tracking Information | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | May 11, 2017 | ||||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | June 9, 2017 | ||||||
Results First Submitted Date ICMJE | October 27, 2019 | ||||||
Results First Posted Date ICMJE | December 13, 2019 | ||||||
Last Update Posted Date | December 13, 2019 | ||||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | November 16, 2016 | ||||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | April 3, 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Symptom Burden Score [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months; period 1 = 1-6 weeks (baseline), period 2 = 6-18 weeks (3 months), period 3 = >18 weeks (6 months) ] The Symptom Burden Score is an expanded version of the 20-item HIV symptom index. The score is calculated for the 28 most common symptoms in persons living with HIV. Each symptom is given a score ranging from 0 to 4 with the scores indicating the following: 0 (not experienced) , 1 (It doesn't bother me), 2 (It bothers me a little), 3 (It bothers me), or 4 (It bothers me a lot). The higher the score (closer to 4), the greater the symptom burden (worse outcome).
|
||||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Decrease symptom frequency and intensity in the intervention group as compared to the control group. [ Time Frame: Six Months ] The PROMIS-29 includes seven health related quality of life domains (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, and Pain), and the pain domain has two subdomains (interference and intensity). Each of the 7 domains has four 5-level items (i.e., 16 decrements each). In addition to these items, pain intensity is assessed using a single 11-point numeric rating scale anchored between no pain (0) and worse imaginable pain. Raw scores are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. T-scores can be estimated using the scoring tables listed in the PROMIS manuals. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; for instance, a higher PROMIS score on physical function indicates better functioning, whereas a higher score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms.
|
||||||
Change History | |||||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Score on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS)-29 [ Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months ] The PROMIS-29 includes seven health related quality of life domains (Physical Functioning, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, Social Functioning, and Pain), and the pain domain has two subdomains (interference and intensity). Each of the 7 domains has four 5-level items (i.e., 16 decrements each). In addition to these items, pain intensity is assessed using a single 11-point numeric rating scale anchored between no pain (0) and worse imaginable pain. Raw scores, except pain intensity, are transformed using the T-score metric based on the item response theory calibrations in which scores have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 for the general population in the US. T-scores can be estimated using scoring tables listed in the PROMIS manuals. A higher PROMIS T-score implies more of the concept being measured; i.e., a higher PROMIS score on physical function indicates better functioning, whereas a higher score on depression indicates more severe depressive symptoms.
|
||||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures |
|
||||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures |
|
||||||
Descriptive Information | |||||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Video Information Provider for HIV-Associated Non-AIDS (VIP-HANA) Symptoms | ||||||
Official Title ICMJE | Video Information Provider for HIV-Associated Non-AIDS (VIP-HANA) Symptoms | ||||||
Brief Summary | The purpose of this study is to use technology to improve symptom status and ultimately improve patient centered outcomes in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). The primary purpose of the intervention (VIP-HANA) is to improve symptom status. The investigators hypothesize that VIP-HANA will improve symptom frequency and intensity. | ||||||
Detailed Description | As PLWHA age, they are developing chronic illnesses and co-morbid conditions that are often seen in older HIV negative patients. HANA conditions (e.g., cardiovascular disease, liver disease, diabetes, and asthma) are becoming more common as PLWHA age. An individual's ability to identify and self-manage symptoms of HIV illness has been shown to improve patient outcomes and quality of life. The investigators will develop and pilot test the Video Information Provider (VIP), a web application (app) that delivered HIV-related symptom self-care strategies for PLWHA for 13 common (non-HANA) HIV/AIDS symptoms. There is a need to identify the symptom experience of PLWHA with HANA conditions. The aim is to compare the efficacy of VIP-HANA to a control arm for ameliorating symptom frequency and intensity and secondary health outcomes in 100 PLWHA with HANA conditions over 6 months. |
||||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
||||||
Condition ICMJE |
|
||||||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||||
Publications * | Cho H, Porras T, Flynn G, Schnall R. Usability of a Consumer Health Informatics Tool Following Completion of a Clinical Trial: Focus Group Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 15;22(6):e17708. doi: 10.2196/17708. | ||||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||
Recruitment Information | |||||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
100 | ||||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | May 31, 2019 | ||||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | April 3, 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||||
Administrative Information | |||||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03182738 | ||||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | AAAP5958 R01NR015737-01A1 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) |
||||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||||
Current Responsible Party | Rebecca Schnall, RN, MPH, PhD, Columbia University | ||||||
Original Responsible Party | Rebecca Schnall, Columbia University, Assistant Professor of Nursing | ||||||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | Columbia University | ||||||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Collaborators ICMJE | National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR) | ||||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||
PRS Account | Columbia University | ||||||
Verification Date | November 2019 | ||||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |