Eye Movements and Visuo-spatial Perception
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03112408 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : April 13, 2017
Last Update Posted : April 21, 2022
|
Tracking Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | March 29, 2017 | ||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | April 13, 2017 | ||||
Last Update Posted Date | April 21, 2022 | ||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | September 26, 2018 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | October 2, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Saccadic adaptation efficiency [ Time Frame: At time of each experimental session, up to 2 months, since first experimental visit until last visit ] 〖Adaptation〗_rate= (〖Amplitude 〗_post-〖Amplitude 〗_pre)/〖Amplitude 〗_pre
|
||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Change History | |||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||
Descriptive Information | |||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Eye Movements and Visuo-spatial Perception | ||||
Official Title ICMJE | Coupling Between Adaptation of Saccadic Eye Movements and Visuo-spatial Perception and Attention Processes: a Behavioural Study in Humans. | ||||
Brief Summary | This research aims to highlight the key roles of the cerebellar and cortical fronto-parietal networks in the coupling of eye movements with visual perception and visuo-spatial attention. | ||||
Detailed Description | The first axe of this research focuses on the role of the cerebellum which has a major contribution to sensorimotor adaptation and more precisely in saccadic adaptation but the nature of this contribution is still debated. A classical assumption stipulates cerebellum has an exclusive action on saccadic burst generator in the brainstem whereas recent data increasingly support the view that cerebellum could also modulates cerebral cortex through a cerebello-thalamo-cortical pathway. On the other hand, several studies have shown that modification of saccade amplitude by saccadic adaptation leads to a distortion of the visual localization of briefly flashed spatial probes but no study to date has tested, the contribution of the cerebellum in these adaptation-induced mislocalizations. The main objective of this axe is to define the role of the cerebellum not only in saccadic adaptation, but also in mislocalizations which occur after adaptation. Moreover, in testing this assumption, arguments in favour -or in disfavor- of the action of the cerebellum on cortical stages dedicated to visuo-spatial perceptual processing will be provided. Besides, variability of cerebellar lesion (or cerebellar dysfunction) location in patients can lead to different pattern in saccadic adaptation and localization task performances. Identification of dissociations between these two abilities in some patients will define more precisely the role of the cerebellum in the coupling between saccadic adaptation and visuo spatial perception as an oculomotor plasticity territory and / or as a territory underlying the error signal coding generating this type of plasticity. This second axe of this research aims to apply basic findings in healthy subject on the coupling between oculomotor plasticity and spatial attention to patients with parietal lesion, in order to evaluate a rehabilitation procedure for neglect patients. Habchi and colleagues showed that the adaptation of reactive saccades in the left hemifield has a boosting effect on attentional performance in the same hemifield. The coupling between these two mechanisms highlighted in healthy subjects can be used as fundamentals in the elaboration of a rehabilitation procedure for attentional disorders in the neglect syndrome. This syndrome is mainly observed after cerebral lesions in the right hemisphere, and is characterized by very disabling cognitive disorders such as an alteration of the spatial representation of left hemi-space and/or left hemi-body. stimulation of sensorimotor plasticity thanks to prismatic adaptation could be used as a rehabilitation procedure for this syndrome. Being another efficient way to stimulate sensorimotor plasticity, the equip believe that saccadic adaptation can also be used as a rehabilitation procedure for neglect patients. Moreover, due to its tight coupling with visual attention, the benefits of saccadic adaptation could be even stronger and longer lasting than the visuo-manual plasticity induced by prismatic adaptation. |
||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment Masking: Single (Participant) Primary Purpose: Basic Science |
||||
Condition ICMJE | Cerebellum Disease | ||||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||
Recruitment Information | |||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | ||||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
24 | ||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
75 | ||||
Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE | October 2, 2020 | ||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | October 2, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria, specific to Axe 1:
Inclusion Criteria, specific to Axe 2:
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria, specific to Axe 1: • Cerebellar patients - Disorders prohibiting the correct performance of the task (tremor, ocular instability) Exclusion Criteria, specific to Axe 2: • Stroke patients
|
||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | Yes | ||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | France | ||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||
Administrative Information | |||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT03112408 | ||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | 69HCL17_0109 2017-A00942-51 ( Other Identifier: ID-RCB ) |
||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||
Current Responsible Party | Hospices Civils de Lyon | ||||
Original Responsible Party | Same as current | ||||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | Hospices Civils de Lyon | ||||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | ||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | ||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||
PRS Account | Hospices Civils de Lyon | ||||
Verification Date | April 2022 | ||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |