Kypho-IORT vs. EBRT in Spinal Metastases
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Know the risks and potential benefits of clinical studies and talk to your health care provider before participating. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02773966|
Recruitment Status : Recruiting
First Posted : May 16, 2016
Last Update Posted : October 27, 2017
|First Submitted Date ICMJE||May 4, 2016|
|First Posted Date ICMJE||May 16, 2016|
|Last Update Posted Date||October 27, 2017|
|Estimated Study Start Date ICMJE||November 2017|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date||November 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||pain evaluation [ Time Frame: day 1 ]
Evaluation of the percentage of patients with a pain reduction of VAS-3 points after Kypho-IORT vs. EBRT at day 1 (one day after Kypho-IORT; one day after the first EBRT)
|Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Same as current|
|Change History||Complete list of historical versions of study NCT02773966 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site|
|Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE
|Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Same as current|
|Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Brief Title ICMJE||Kypho-IORT vs. EBRT in Spinal Metastases|
|Official Title ICMJE||Intraoperative Radiotherapy During Kyphoplasty/Vertebroplasty (Kypho-IORT) Versus EBRT in the Treatment of Painful Vertebral Metastases - a Randomized Prospective Phase III Study -|
|Brief Summary||The objective of this randomized phase III study is to test the superiority of Kypho-IORT compared to EBRT with regard of time to pain reduction in patients with painful vertebral metastases. Therefore patients will receive intraoperative radiotherapy (8 Gy with Intrabeam System/Carl Zeiss) during kyphoplasty (Arm A) or external beam radiotherapy with 30 Gy, added in 3 Gy per fraction on a conventional linear accelerator or 8 Gy single dose (only for international study centers, not permitted in Germany) (Arm B).|
Due to optimized therapies life expectancy of patients with metastasizing cancer increases. Bone metastases affect 10% - 30% of all cancer patients, especially located in the vertebral column. The main clinical problems are back pain and an increased risk of pathological fracture. Therefore optimized palliative treatments to improve quality of life are necessary.
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a well-established treatment option for patients with spinal metastases. EBRT often results in an adequate pain relief with good local tumor control . Of the retrospective series that described pain outcome mentioned in the systematic review by Gerszten et al., a mean of 70% of patients had improvement in pain after radiation therapy. The mean rate of local control was 77%. Although EBRT is the standard treatment for painful vertebral metastases, the optimal dose fraction schedule or the optimal standard dose has not been established. Different fractionation schedules of EBRT are discussed in a recently published review. Literature data confirm time to pain reduction of about 8-10 days after EBRT.
Balloon kyphoplasty is another valuable treatment option for patients with painful and instable metastases to the vertebral column. In the recent published trial by Berenson et al. 134 patients with vertebral compression fractures were enrolled and randomly assigned to kyphoplasty or non-surgical management. The study found that patients treated with kyphoplasty had a significant reduction of back pain after seven days. Nevertheless kyphoplasty has no direct anticancer effect and external beam radiotherapy has to follow to avoid early regrowth. But EBRT after kyphoplasty or EBRT alone takes up to 2-4 weeks. This long treatment period can often be a mental and physical strain. Moreover patients with simultaneous visceral metastases often need chemotherapy which cannot be applied concurrently to radiotherapy due to the risk of potentiated toxicity. To reduce treatment time and increase quality of life novel techniques like kyphoplasty combined with other physical methods are under development. Recently published trials showed good results relating to pain relief and local tumor control in patients with spinal metastases treated with kyphoplasty combined with intravertebral administration of 153Samarium or interstitial implantation of 125I seeds. Therefore we developed a novel approach to deliver intraoperative radiotherapy during kyphoplasty (Kypho-IORT). Based on our recently published reports Kypho-IORT is a technical feasible new treatment option without severe side effects. We observed an excellent pain relief. At the first postoperative day improvement of pain was observed in 11 of 16 (69%) patients and no change in 5 of 16 (31%) patients. During further follow-up, improvement of pain was seen in 75% - 83% of the patients compared to the preoperative status. According to these results a dose escalation study has been initiated, which has been completed (NCT 01280032). According to the results of this study a dose of 8 Gy in 10 mm depth from the applicator surface (correlates to a dose prescription from the isocenter of the radiation source of 8 Gy in 13 mm) is recommended for further Kypho-IORTs.
According to this the aim of this planned phase III study is to test the superiority of kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty + IORT (in the following abbreviated as Kypho-IORT) compared to EBRT with regard to time to pain reduction at defined points in time (day 1, week 2, 6 weeks after start of treatment).
We assume a pain reduction of VAS-3 points at day one (first day after Kypho-IORT, one day after the first EBRT) for 40% of the patients after Kypho-IORT vs. 5% of the patients after EBRT under standard pain medication (no change of the pretherapeutic pain medication 12 h after Kypho-IORT or rather 24 h after the first EBRT). Each study arm needs 22 patients, to reach an alpha of 0, 05 and a power of 0,817. Plus a dropout rate of 20% at least 54 patients have to be recruited.
All patients with spinal metastases who present for treatment will be given, if these have not been done in advance: a MRI and a CT of the total spine and a clinical examination, especially a neurological examination.
Kypho-IORT will be carried out under general anaesthesia like the standard procedure with minor modifications. All patients will be placed in prone position on a radiolucent table. For intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) the Intrabeam System (Carl Zeiss Surgical, Oberkochen, Germany) will be used. In order to carry out the intraoperative radiation therapy, working cannulas are inserted into the affected vertebral body in a normal bipedicular procedure, special sleeves are inserted monopedicularly. These serve as guides for the radiation applicator. After checking the correct positioning of the working cannulas using fluoroscopic guidance, the specially designed applicator is placed precisely in the vertebral body. Documentation of the location of the tip of the INTRABEAM System should be performed whenever possible using bi-planar X-rays.
After verification the selected dose of 8 Gy in a depth of 13 mm from the isocenter of the radiation source is applied for a period of approximately 5 minutes.
After completion of the radiation therapy, the radiation unit including the applicator is removed and the operation is concluded in accordance with standard procedure.
The external beam radiotherapy will be usually carried out as an outpatient procedure. All patients will receive a planning CT before the first irradiation. EBRT will be performed with 30 Gy, added in 3 Gy per fraction or 8 Gy single dose (only for international study centers, not permitted in Germany) on a conventional linear accelerator (LINAC). During EBRT, patients are routinely seen once weekly by physicians and evaluated for adverse reactions.
Before treatment the registration form has to be filled out including the following items:
Follow-up visits will be scheduled after 6 weeks, then after 3 months, then every 6 months up to 5 years. At each follow-up the following information will be documented:
Furthermore, an inspection of the surgical scar to exclude wound healing problems and a neurological examination to document any functional impairment due to spinal cord or nerve damage will be carried out. To assess skin toxicity, photographic documentation of the surgical scar/irradiation field will be carried out. For documentation of osteoradionecrosis, pathological fractures and relapses a MRI or CT examinations will be carried out. The evaluation of the MRI or CT examinations will be performed by the radiologists of the respective participating clinic, or in the case of externally prepared images, by the radiologists of the medical practice. To document Quality of Life, the patients will be requested to complete two questionnaires of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BM22) before Kypho-IORT/EBRT and during the follow-up examinations. Answering the questions will take approximately 10 minutes. The follow-up and documentation of patient specific data will end 5 years after therapy.
Classification and graduating of side effects are rated by "Common Toxicity Criteria" (CTCv4.0) of the National Cancer Institute. To document acute toxicities after Kypho-IORT, a physical examination including in particular an inspection of the surgical scar and an evaluation of the current pain level (VAS) will be performed one day and 2 weeks after Kypho-IORT. Moreover a conventional X-ray of the affected section of the spine will be performed one day after Kypho-IORT. One day after the first EBRT and after the last EBRT, same-day, a physical examination and an evaluation of the current pain level (VAS) will be performed to document acute toxicities. Moreover during EBRT, patients are routinely seen once weekly by physicians and evaluated for adverse reactions. If necessary, any occurring acute reactions will be documented upon discharge from the hospital and checked at the follow-up appointments.
The acquisition of late toxicities will be done based on the LENT SOMA score. To document the late toxicities, follow-up examinations with magnetic resonance imaging or computer tomography, as well as another physical examination will be performed. Moreover a photographic documentation of the surgical scar/irradiation field will be carried out to assess skin toxicity.
Serious adverse events (SAEs) are defined as any event that is fatal, life threatening, causes or prolongs hospitalization; causes disability or incapacity or requires medical intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage, or any grade 4 toxicity. Only radiation or surgery related SAEs should be reported. Hospitalization for performing protocol-required procedures is not classified as an SAE. Hospitalization for disease-related procedures (surgery, imaging, laboratory tests) or any procedures planned before entry into the study are not considered SAEs. Hospitalizations for social reasons in the absence of an adverse event are not classified as SAEs either. Furthermore radiation or surgery related SAEs requiring therapy should be documented (e.g. antibiotics, re-surgery).
In case of death an autopsy should be done to clarify the cause of death. The trial will be carried out in compliance with the protocol, the principles laid down in the declaration of Helsinki, version as of October 1996 (as long as local laws do not require to follow other versions), in accordance with the ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP), the harmonized standards for Medical Devices (ISO 14155) and all other applicable regulatory requirements (local, regional and global). Standard medical care (prophylactic, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures) remains in the responsibility of the treating physician of the patient.
This study is approved by the local ethics committee and the Federal Office of Radiation Protection.
The informed consent is performed written and verbally by the responsible physician. The informed consent is done at least 24 h before treatment. During the education the physician has to indicate that a withdrawal is possible at each time and does not result in disadvantages for the patient.
Treatment of the patient must be discontinued if one or more of the following criteria apply:
The steering committee is allowed to close the study ahead of schedule.
Other termination criteria include:
|Study Type ICMJE||Interventional|
|Study Phase||Phase 3|
|Study Design ICMJE||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
|Recruitment Status ICMJE||Recruiting|
|Estimated Enrollment ICMJE
|Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE||Same as current|
|Estimated Study Completion Date||November 2024|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date||November 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Eligibility Criteria ICMJE||
|Ages||50 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)|
|Accepts Healthy Volunteers||No|
|Listed Location Countries ICMJE||Germany|
|Removed Location Countries|
|NCT Number ICMJE||NCT02773966|
|Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE||Kypho-IORT/EBRT|
|Has Data Monitoring Committee||Yes|
|U.S. FDA-regulated Product||
|IPD Sharing Statement||
|Responsible Party||Frederik Wenz, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim|
|Study Sponsor ICMJE||Universitätsmedizin Mannheim|
|Collaborators ICMJE||Not Provided|
|PRS Account||Universitätsmedizin Mannheim|
|Verification Date||October 2017|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP