Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Versus LMWH +/- Warfarin for VTE in Cancer (CANVAS)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02744092 |
Recruitment Status :
Active, not recruiting
First Posted : April 20, 2016
Last Update Posted : May 10, 2022
|
Tracking Information | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date ICMJE | April 11, 2016 | ||||||
First Posted Date ICMJE | April 20, 2016 | ||||||
Last Update Posted Date | May 10, 2022 | ||||||
Actual Study Start Date ICMJE | December 2016 | ||||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | January 12, 2023 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
Cumulative VTE recurrence reported by participants (via study-specific questionnaire) or clinicians (via study-specific case report form) [ Time Frame: 6 months ] To compare the effectiveness of anticoagulation with a DOAC (intervention) with LMWH/warfarin (comparator) for preventing VTE recurrence in patients with cancer based on cumulative VTE recurrence reported by patients or clinicians at 6 months.
|
||||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Change History | |||||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
||||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | ||||||
Descriptive Information | |||||||
Brief Title ICMJE | Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Versus LMWH +/- Warfarin for VTE in Cancer | ||||||
Official Title ICMJE | Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Versus LMWH +/- Warfarin for VTE in Cancer: A Randomized Effectiveness Trial (CANVAS Trial) | ||||||
Brief Summary | The overarching objective of the study is to determine the effectiveness of LMWH/ warfarin vs. DOAC anticoagulation for preventing recurrent VTE in cancer patients. The intervention strategy is Direct Oral AntiCoagulants (DOAC) therapy with edoxaban, apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran. The comparator is low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) alone or with warfarin. The information gained will empower cancer patients and physicians to make more informed choices about anticoagulation strategies to manage VTE. | ||||||
Detailed Description | Venous blood clots affect nearly a million Americans each year. Venous clots in the legs are called deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and are dangerous because they travel to the lungs where they cause blockages known as pulmonary emboli (PE). DVT and PE are called venous thromboemboli (VTE). Cancer is a risk factor with nearly 200,000 VTEs in cancer patients each year. The purpose of VTE treatment is to prevent the initial clot from spreading and to prevent new clots from forming. This is accomplished by thinning the blood, or anticoagulation. Without anticoagulation, VTEs recur and are often fatal. Recently, the FDA has approved 4 new Direct Oral AntiCoagulants (DOACs) for preventing VTE recurrence. Few cancer patients were included in the efficacy trials, and practice guidelines fall silent on whether switching to DOAC therapy is advisable. To fill this knowledge gap, the Alliance Foundation Trials LLC, a research network of academic and community practices across the US, is conducting a pragmatic randomized effectiveness trial. The overarching objective of the study is to determine the effectiveness of LMWH/ warfarin vs. DOAC anticoagulation for preventing recurrent VTE in cancer patients. The investigators will conduct a trial of 811 cancer patients followed for 6 months. The intervention strategy is DOAC therapy with edoxaban, apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran. The comparator is LMWH alone or with warfarin. Within each arm, patients can choose the agent they prefer based on side effects, drug interactions, and practical issues such as co-pays. The trial compares these two strategies in terms of treatment: 1) benefits based on VTE recurrence; 2) harms based on bleeding rates; 3) burdens based on patients' reports of their experiences; and 4) mortality rates. The investigators hypothesize that the benefits, harms and burdens of DOAC treatment will be non-inferior to, or better than, usual care with LMWH/ warfarin among cancer patients. The information gained will empower cancer patients and physicians to make more informed choices about anticoagulation strategies to manage VTE. |
||||||
Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | ||||||
Study Phase ICMJE | Not Applicable | ||||||
Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
||||||
Condition ICMJE |
|
||||||
Intervention ICMJE |
|
||||||
Study Arms ICMJE |
|
||||||
Publications * | Riaz IB, Fuentes HE, Naqvi SAA, He H, Sipra QR, Tafur AJ, Padranos L, Wysokinski WE, Marshall AL, Vandvik PO, Montori V, Bryce AH, Liu H, Badgett RG, Murad MH, McBane RD 2nd. Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared With Dalteparin for Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Living, Interactive Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2022 Feb;97(2):308-324. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.10.041. Epub 2021 Jun 22. | ||||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||
Recruitment Information | |||||||
Recruitment Status ICMJE | Active, not recruiting | ||||||
Actual Enrollment ICMJE |
811 | ||||||
Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE |
940 | ||||||
Estimated Study Completion Date ICMJE | January 12, 2023 | ||||||
Estimated Primary Completion Date | January 12, 2023 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||
Sex/Gender ICMJE |
|
||||||
Ages ICMJE | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE | No | ||||||
Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||
Listed Location Countries ICMJE | United States | ||||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||||
Administrative Information | |||||||
NCT Number ICMJE | NCT02744092 | ||||||
Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | AFT-28 CER-1503-29805 ( Other Grant/Funding Number: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) ) |
||||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | Yes | ||||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | ||||||
IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE |
|
||||||
Current Responsible Party | Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC. | ||||||
Original Responsible Party | Same as current | ||||||
Current Study Sponsor ICMJE | Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC. | ||||||
Original Study Sponsor ICMJE | Same as current | ||||||
Collaborators ICMJE | Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute | ||||||
Investigators ICMJE |
|
||||||
PRS Account | Alliance Foundation Trials, LLC. | ||||||
Verification Date | May 2022 | ||||||
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |