EnBrace HR for Depression Treatment and Prevention in Women Trying to Conceive and Early Pregnancy
|First Submitted Date ICMJE||February 4, 2016|
|First Posted Date ICMJE||February 8, 2016|
|Last Update Posted Date||June 9, 2017|
|Start Date ICMJE||September 2016|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date||September 2017 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
|Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||Major depressive episode defined by the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) [ Time Frame: Assessed every two weeks for 12 weeks ]
Evidence of recurrence of major depression episode, as defined by the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) mood portion and/or research clinician interview
|Change History||Complete list of historical versions of study NCT02676882 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site|
|Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Brief Title ICMJE||EnBrace HR for Depression Treatment and Prevention in Women Trying to Conceive and Early Pregnancy|
|Official Title ICMJE||EnBrace HR for Depression Treatment and Prevention in Women Trying to Conceive and Early Pregnancy|
|Brief Summary||The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the EnBrace HR prenatal supplement in preventing depression in women with a history of depression who have decided to stop taking antidepressants during their pregnancy, or treating women who are currently in a depressive episode while pregnant or planning pregnancy.|
Major depressive disorder (MDD) occurs twice as often in women as in men, with an age of onset that coincides with the childbearing years. As over 20% of reproductive-age women experience an episode of depression, identifying safe and effective treatments for depression before, during and after pregnancy has become a critical public health issue. Historically, pregnancy has been viewed as a protective time with respect to risk for psychiatric illnesses, which has resulted in a lack of prospective systematic investigations on the subject of acute treatment and prevention of MDD while women are planning to conceive and during pregnancy. Contrary to previous assumptions, recent large-scale studies demonstrate that new onset and recurrence of depressive episodes occur commonly during pregnancy and the postpartum periods. The current standard of treatment for recurrent major depression is maintenance antidepressant (AD) therapy, due to the high risk of recurrence among patients who discontinue maintenance AD therapy.
Although ADs are frequently used during pregnancy, concerns remain regarding a spectrum of adverse outcomes associated with fetal exposure to these medications including: increased risk for teratogenicity compromised obstetrical outcomes and a variety of negative neonatal clinical syndromes. Given these concerns, reproductive age women treated with AD frequently elect to discontinue their medications proximate to pregnancy or immediately after becoming pregnant despite the known increased risk for relapse or recurrence. With the exception of observational data that demonstrate that women who discontinue medication around the time of conception are at high risk of recurrence, no previous studies are available to inform clinical treatment regarding medication discontinuation for a planned pregnancy.
This leaves women who are successfully treated with ADs and want to become pregnant caught in the difficult clinical dilemma of weighing the risks of fetal exposure to medication against the potential impact of untreated maternal depression during pregnancy. Clinical decisions are made even more complex by the fact that most studies are far from definitive in terms of comparing the risks of in utero exposure to ADs to the risks of untreated antenatal mood disorder. Given this level of uncertainty, many women and their health care providers would welcome evidence-based non-psychotropic interventions as an alternative to ADs in order to prevent recurrence in euthymic women with histories of MDD as they plan pregnancy. However, the potential efficacy of non-psychotropic interventions for this population has not been systematically investigated.
There is consistent and growing evidence of a role for various folate forms in the prevention and treatment of depression. In fact, there is compelling evidence that treatment with a methylfolate agent would not only avoid the potential risks of antidepressants in pregnancy, but would also confer important benefits to pregnancy and child outcomes as well, such as prevention of major birth defects and longer term neurodevelopmental outcomes. To date, there is an evidence base for antidepressant effects for folic acid, folinic acid, and methylfolate, and similar findings may be attributable to the fact that these folate forms share an interconversion potential in the complex set of pathways that comprise the one-carbon cycle. These reactions, which in turn depend on B12 and homocysteine availability, are postulated to exert an antidepressant effect by impacting the synthesis of neurotransmitters such as norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin.
Some but not all studies suggest efficacy of folate monotherapy for MDD, but this intervention may be limited by the common occurence of polymorphisms in the general population that make folate a less efficient one-carbon cycle constituent than L-methylfolate. Since certain polymorphisms that impair methylation processes and the conversion of folate into its active form, methylfolate, have been found to be overrepresented in individuals with depression, methylfolate may be a more effective form of folate supplementation to target MDD. Also, methylfolate may be more readily absorbed in the brain compared to other folate forms.
Recently, Fava and colleagues demonstrated that L-methylfolate is significantly superior to placebo for the treatment of major depressive disorder in patients who had failed to respond to AD therapy alone. In addition, several other open and blinded studies of methylfolate monotherapy in a variety of depressed populations have found that patients experienced significant improvement in depressive symptoms with no drug-related adverse events. Although more controlled data are needed, initial studies indicate that methylfolate may be a safe and effective option for the treatment of depression, especially in populations that are vulnerable to medication-related adverse events, and those who are folate deficient or whose folate needs are elevated, such as the case in pregnant women.
EnBrace HR is a prescription prenatal/postnatal dietary management product that contains vitamins and minerals, including folic acid and methylfolate. It meets the above criteria as a potential ideal candidate for the prevention of depression in pregnancy. It contains L-methylfolate and other folate derivatives, and is optimal for a population with high rates of polymorphisms that affect folic acid metabolism. It also contains omega-3 fatty acids, primarily eicosapentaenoic acid, which shows promise for the treatment of depression. Importantly, these components are crucial for healthy pregnancies. Folic acid supplementation has been associated with the reduced risk of neural tube defects and is recommended for use in women of reproductive potential to reduce the risk of birth defects, although a substantial proportion of the population are poor folic acid metabolizers. Methylfolate compounds specifically may provide a more efficient delivery of folate-related compounds to this end.
Very few studies have examined treatments specifically to assist patients that discontinue ADs, and none have examined this during the time proximate to attempts to conceive, or during pregnancy, which is particularly relevant due to safety concerns. The adaptation of a non-psychotropic treatment, such as EnBrace, for use in women who are planning pregnancy or who are pregnant who choose to discontinue maintenance AD treatment would broaden treatment choices available during this important time in the female life-cycle.
Objective: The overarching goal of this investigation is to assess EnBrace as a treatment for the acute treatment and prevention of depression in women with a history of major depressive disorder who decide to avoid or discontinue their maintenance AD treatment for pregnancy. After completing this protocol, we plan to use the preliminary data for the development of a randomized controlled trial protocol. We will include two groups of women who are interested in minimizing medication exposures while trying to conceive or during pregnancy: 1) women who have histories of depression and are not depressed, and would like to stop antidepressants for pregnancy, 2) women in depressive episodes who are pregnant or trying to conceive (on or off of antidepressant medications).
Specific Aim 1a: To evaluate the efficacy of EnBrace when used as maintenance treatment for MDD in a group of women (N=10) who are trying to conceive or are early in pregnancy and who have decided to stop ADs (Group 1). Relapse rates for women in this context have been demonstrated to be high, with 68% relapse rates in a large multisite NIMH-funded trial.
Specific Aim 1b: To evaluate the efficacy of EnBrace when used as an acute treatment for MDD in a group of women (N=10) who are trying to conceive or are early in pregnancy (Group 2). Women will have major depressive episodes in this group, and may receive EnBrace as monotherapy, or as an adjunct to current pharmacotherapy.
Hypothesis 1a: We hypothesize that relapse rates will be lower for women who receive EnBrace compared to historical controls. MDD relapse will be determined by the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) mood module that will be administered by a study clinician at each visit.
Hypothesis 1b: We hypothesize that the majority of women who receive EnBrace will experience a response (50% improvement in depressive symptoms) to EnBrace therapy.
Specific Aim 2: To identify biological markers as potential predictors of response to EnBrace.
Hypothesis 2: We hypothesize that pre- to post-treatment changes in homocysteine, folate, B12, IL-6 and CRP will be associated with response to EnBrace. We hypothesize specifically that levels of folate and B12 will increase and homocysteine will decrease temporally with treatment and be predictive of prevention of depressive episodes. We hypothesize that treatment will lower IL-6 and CRP levels due to the anti-inflammatory components of EnBrace (i.e., omega-3 fatty acids) and that decreased levels of inflammatory markers may predict lower risk of depressive relapse in participants who enter the study while not on a depressive episode (Group 1), and will predict response to treatment in women who enter the study while in a depressive episode (Group 2).
Specific Aim 3 (Exploratory): To identify factors influencing adherence to and tolerability of treatment. This will be achieved by using qualitative methods to explore (a) perceived risks and benefits of treatment; (b) perceived side effect profile; (c) treatment convenience; (d) knowledge of, attitudes towards, and preferences for depression treatment while attempting to conceive or early pregnancy.
Hypothesis 3: We hypothesize that EnBrace will be perceived by patients as 1) an acceptable and attractive treatment with a favorable risk/benefit profile in the context of pregnancy or while trying to conceive, 2) well tolerated, 3) convenient and easy to adhere to, 4) will be a treatment that women who are trying to conceive or who are pregnant find intuitive and preferable to prescription antidepressant medication (or for women on antidepressant treatment in Group 2, who prefer the augmentation with EnBrace rather than an increase in antidepressant dose or augmentation with a prescription psychotropic medication).
|Study Type ICMJE||Interventional|
|Study Phase||Not Provided|
|Study Design ICMJE||Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
|Intervention ICMJE||Dietary Supplement: EnBrace HR
Prescription folate prenatal supplement with other dietary ingredients; one multiphasic soft gelatin capsule 1x/day for 12 week study
|Study Arms||EnBrace HR
Prescription folate prenatal supplement with other dietary ingredients; one multiphasic soft gelatin capsule 1x/day for 12 weeks
Intervention: Dietary Supplement: EnBrace HR
|Publications *||Not Provided|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
|Recruitment Status ICMJE||Recruiting|
|Estimated Enrollment ICMJE||20|
|Estimated Completion Date||December 2017|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date||September 2017 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Eligibility Criteria ICMJE||
Group 1 (Observational, not-randomized)
|Ages||18 Years and older (Adult, Senior)|
|Accepts Healthy Volunteers||No|
|Listed Location Countries ICMJE||United States|
|Removed Location Countries|
|NCT Number ICMJE||NCT02676882|
|Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE||2016P000275|
|Has Data Monitoring Committee||No|
|U.S. FDA-regulated Product||Not Provided|
|IPD Sharing Statement||
|Responsible Party||Marlene P. Freeman, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital|
|Study Sponsor ICMJE||Massachusetts General Hospital|
|Collaborators ICMJE||JayMac Pharmaceuticals, LLC|
|PRS Account||Massachusetts General Hospital|
|Verification Date||June 2017|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP