Working…
COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation.
Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov.

Get the latest research information from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus.
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Response of Subretinal Administration of CNTO 2476 in Participants With Geographic Atrophy (PRELUDE)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02659098
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 20, 2016
Results First Posted : June 23, 2020
Last Update Posted : June 23, 2020
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date  ICMJE December 7, 2015
First Posted Date  ICMJE January 20, 2016
Results First Submitted Date  ICMJE June 2, 2020
Results First Posted Date  ICMJE June 23, 2020
Last Update Posted Date June 23, 2020
Actual Study Start Date  ICMJE December 4, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date June 5, 2019   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: June 2, 2020)
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 1- Treated Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 1 ]
    Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 2- Treated Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 2 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 3- Treated Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 6- Treated Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 12- Treated Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 18- Treated Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 18 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 24- Treated Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 30- Treated Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 30 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 36- Treated Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 1- Fellow Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 1 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 2- Fellow Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 2 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 3- Fellow Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 3 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 6- Fellow Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 6 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 12- Fellow Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there are 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represents a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score is: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 18- Fellow Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 18 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 24- Fellow Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 24 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 30- Fellow Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 30 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 36- Fellow Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline and Month 36 ]
    BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Original Primary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: January 14, 2016)
  • Safety Profile of the Surgical Procedure and Device in Participants [ Time Frame: Up to Month 1 ]
    The number of eyes with treatment related ocular adverse events will be evaluated to determine the safety profile of suprachoroidal surgical approach and the SubRetinal Access Kit (SRAK-02) delivery device after drug administration in participants.
  • Performance Profile of the Surgical Procedure and Device in Participants [ Time Frame: Up to Month 1 ]
    The ability of the device to deliver CNTO 2476 cells to the subretinal space (percentage of cases with successful cell delivery) will be evaluated to determine the performance profile of suprachoroidal surgical approach and the SubRetinal Access Kit (SRAK-02) delivery device after drug administration in participants.
  • Percentage of Participants in the Randomized Double Masked Treatment Phase Showing Improvement From Baseline of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Letters in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Up to Month 6 ]
    The BCVA testing performed after refraction and under standardized photopic lighting conditions and distance using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) log of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR chart).
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: June 2, 2020)
  • Percentage of Participants Losing Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Treated Eye [ Time Frame: Months 1, 2 , 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 ]
    BCVA was assessed as letters read using early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts and reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye (Treated eye). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. The percentage of participants losing >=15 BCVA in the study eye were reported.
  • Percentage of Participants Losing >=15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Fellow Eye [ Time Frame: Months 1, 2 , 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 ]
    BCVA was assessed as letters read using early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts and reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the fellow eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. The percentage of participants losing >=15 BCVA in the fellow eye were reported.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters at Months 6 and 12: Treated Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12 ]
    BCVA was assessed as letters read using early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts and reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye (Treated eye). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening.
  • Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity at Months 6 and 12: Fellow Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12 ]
    BCVA was assessed as letters read using early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts and reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the fellow eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening.
  • Change From Baseline in Growth Rate of Geographic Atrophy (GA) Lesion Area at Months 6 and 12: Treated Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12 ]
    The area of GA was determined based primarily on fundus autofluorescence (FAF). The change in GA lesion area was measured by FAF and analysis of FAF images was performed by the central reading center. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of GA lesion area (worsening; disease progression).
  • Change From Baseline in Growth Rate of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area at Months 6 and 12: Fellow Eye [ Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12 ]
    The area of GA was determined based primarily on FAF. The change in GA lesion area was measured by FAF and analysis of FAF images was performed by the central reading center. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of GA lesion area (worsening; disease progression).
  • Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [ Time Frame: Up to Months 36 ]
    Number of participants with TEAEs and SAEs were assessed. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment and can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, Is life-threatening, Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, Is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product.
  • Number of Participants With Ocular Treatment-emergent Adverse Events [ Time Frame: Up to Months 36 ]
    Number of participants with ocular TEAE were assessed. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment and can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures  ICMJE
 (submitted: January 14, 2016)
  • Percentage of Participants Losing >=15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Letters From Baseline at 12 Months [ Time Frame: Baseline to Month 12 ]
    The BCVA testing performed after refraction and under standardized photopic lighting conditions and distance using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) log of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR chart).
  • Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Letters From Baseline at 6 and 12 Months [ Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12 ]
    The BCVA testing performed after refraction and under standardized photopic lighting conditions and distance using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) log of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR chart).
  • Change in Growth Rate of Geographic Atrophy (GA) Lesion Documented at Baseline to 6 and 12 Months [ Time Frame: Baseline, Months 6 and 12 ]
    Lesion size will be determined by fundus autofluorescence (FAF).
  • Mean Change in Quality of Life From Baseline at 6 and 12 Months [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 and 12 ]
    Health-related quality of life will be assessed utilizing the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) and 3-item Near Vision subscale, and Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36).
  • Mean Change in Reading Acuity (RA) From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 and 12 ]
    Minnesota reading test will be used to determine RA [measured in log of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR)].
  • Mean Change in Letter Number and Line Number From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months in Low Luminance Best Corrected Visual Acuity (LL BCVA) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 and 12 ]
    Low Luminance BCVA indicates the best possible vision that an eye can achieve with the use of trial frames/lenses following refraction under low luminance conditions.
  • Mean Change in Contrast Sensitivity From Baseline to 6 and 12 Months [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 and 12 ]
    Contrast sensitivity will measures the sensitivity to contrast at a fixed letter size under photopic conditions.
  • Percentage of Participants who Convert to Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) in the Study Eye and in the Fellow Eye [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]
    Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) in the Study Eye and in the Fellow Eye will be evaluated.
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title  ICMJE A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Response of Subretinal Administration of CNTO 2476 in Participants With Geographic Atrophy
Official Title  ICMJE A Phase 2b, Multicenter, Double-masked, Randomized Study Evaluating the Safety and Clinical Response of Subretinal Administration of CNTO 2476 in Subjects With Visual Acuity Impairment Associated With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age Related Macular Degeneration
Brief Summary The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance profile of the suprachoroidal surgical approach and the Delivery System.
Detailed Description This is a multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study) study which includes an initial unmasked safety phase. The duration of participation in the study for each participant is approximately 3 years. Efficacy will be evaluated at 6 months, 12 months and annually thereafter. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.
Study Type  ICMJE Interventional
Study Phase  ICMJE Phase 2
Study Design  ICMJE Allocation: N/A
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition  ICMJE
  • Visual Acuity
  • Geographic Atrophy
  • Macular Degeneration
Intervention  ICMJE
  • Drug: CNTO 2476 3.0 x 10^5 cells
    Participants will receive a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 3.0 x 10^5 cells in 50 microliter (mcL) given by subretinal Delivery System.
  • Device: Subretinal Delivery System
    Participants will receive CNTO 2476 by using the Delivery System.
Study Arms  ICMJE Experimental: Open-Label Safety Run-in Phase: Treatment Group
Participants will receive CNTO 2476 3.0 x 10^5 cells in 50 microliter (mcL). CNTO 2476 will be delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System.
Interventions:
  • Drug: CNTO 2476 3.0 x 10^5 cells
  • Device: Subretinal Delivery System
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status  ICMJE Completed
Actual Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: January 15, 2018)
21
Original Estimated Enrollment  ICMJE
 (submitted: January 14, 2016)
255
Actual Study Completion Date  ICMJE June 5, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date June 5, 2019   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria  ICMJE

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) confirmed within 45 days prior to initial randomization verified by the central reading center
  • Study eyes will have a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/80 to 20/800 [Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) log of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) value 0.6-1.6]. The treatment eye will be that with the worse BCVA at Screening. If BCVA is clinically equivalent, the eye with the larger GA determines the study eye
  • Participant is a suitable candidate for ophthalmologic surgery, is willing and able to comply with the surgical procedure, scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other study procedures. Participant has met criteria of the surgery center anti-coagulation protocol, if applicable
  • Each participant must sign an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that he or she understands the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has a history of neovascular ("wet") AMD in the treatment eye, including evidence of retinal pigment epithelium rips or evidence of subretinal or choroidal neovascularization or fluid. In cases where imaging is inconclusive, review of the case with the study site, considering history and imaging will determine eligibility. History or evidence of neovascular AMD in the fellow eye is allowed, if anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy has not been required for at least 8 weeks prior to Screening
  • Geographic atrophy secondary to any causes other than AMD in either eye
  • A diagnosis of glaucoma with an intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than or equal to (>=) 25 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) while being treated with an ocular hypotensive drug. Treatment should be no more than 1 drug preparation/combination, which can contain 1 or 2 ocular hypotensive active ingredients; participants receiving more than 2 ocular hypotensive active ingredients are excluded
  • Nuclear sclerotic cataract, cortical spoking, posterior subcapsular cataract above Grade 2 per Age Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) scale or any other ophthalmologic condition that reduces the clarity of the media that, in the opinion of the investigator or reading center, interferes with ophthalmologic examination (example, corneal abnormalities, inadequate pupillary dilation), surgery or imaging in the study eye
  • Myopia greater than minus (>-) 8 diopters and participants with greater than (>) 4 diopters of astigmatism, and greater than plus (>+) 10 diopters of hyperopia
Sex/Gender  ICMJE
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages  ICMJE 55 Years to 90 Years   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers  ICMJE No
Contacts  ICMJE Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries  ICMJE United States
Removed Location Countries Canada
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number  ICMJE NCT02659098
Other Study ID Numbers  ICMJE CR106814
CNTO2476MDG2002 ( Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC )
Has Data Monitoring Committee Yes
U.S. FDA-regulated Product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
IPD Sharing Statement  ICMJE Not Provided
Responsible Party Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Study Sponsor  ICMJE Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Collaborators  ICMJE Not Provided
Investigators  ICMJE
Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial Janssen Research & Development, LLC
PRS Account Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Verification Date June 2020

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP