We're building a better ClinicalTrials.gov. Check it out and tell us what you think!
Try the New Site
We're building a modernized ClinicalTrials.gov! Visit Beta.ClinicalTrials.gov to try the new functionality.
Working…
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Sorting of Oral Sensations

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
 
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02390180
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 17, 2015
Last Update Posted : May 12, 2015
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Richard Mattes, Purdue University

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date March 10, 2015
First Posted Date March 17, 2015
Last Update Posted Date May 12, 2015
Study Start Date October 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date March 2015   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: March 16, 2015)
Similarity of taste sensations [ Time Frame: 1 visit (only visit) ]
Participants sort the solutions into groups, and then combine the groups based on which samples are similar in oral sensation. This is used to determine how similar or different each sample is from the others. We are primarily interested in how the fatty acids (hexenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and decenoic acid) are sorted, and whether they are distinct from other tastes.
Original Primary Outcome Measures Same as current
Change History
Current Secondary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: March 16, 2015)
  • Effect of dietary fat on taste sensation sorting [ Time Frame: 1 visit (only visit) ]
    Dietary records will be used to classify participants' diets as high or low in fat. The analysis of similarity among samples will be repeated and compared between these two groups. We are primarily interested in how the fatty acids (hexenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and decenoic acid) are sorted, and whether they are distinct from other tastes.
  • Effect of genetic ability to taste propylthiouracil on taste sensation sorting [ Time Frame: 1 visit (only visit) ]
    Participants will be classified by their ability to taste 6-n-propylthiouracil (using filter papers wil phenylthiocarbamide and using data from sorting the bitter compounds). Tasters and non-tasters of this compound will be compared in their sorting of the different solutions. This will be done for the Sorting Bitter tastes group only. We are primarily interested in how the fatty acids (hexenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and decenoic acid) are sorted, and whether they are distinct from other tastes.
  • Effect of gender on taste sensation sorting [ Time Frame: 1 visit (only visit) ]
    Sorting patterns by males and females will be compared as well. We are primarily interested in how the fatty acids (hexenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and decenoic acid) are sorted, and whether they are distinct from other tastes.
  • Effect of BMI on taste sensation sorting [ Time Frame: 1 visit (only visit) ]
    Sorting patterns by lean, overweight, and obese participants will be compared as well, using the data collected on height and weight to calculate body mass index. We are primarily interested in how the fatty acids (hexenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and decenoic acid) are sorted, and whether they are distinct from other tastes.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures Same as current
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title Sorting of Oral Sensations
Official Title Sorting of Oral Sensations
Brief Summary Recent research indicates that fatty acids in food may have a taste. There is no lexicon to describe the sensation of the fatty acids, but participants frequently describe the sensation as bitter or sour. The proposed study will ask participants who have been screened for their ability to detect fatty acids to sort a variety of taste stimuli, including sweet, sour, salty, bitter, umami, and fatty acid tastes. Observing how the participants sort the stimuli will allow us to determine if the fatty acid taste is unique from other taste sensations.
Detailed Description

Panelists will be screened for their ability to discriminate 0.5% linoleic acid emulsion from the blank using two sequential tetrad tests. Panelists will wear nose clips during the tests. Panelists must successfully complete both tetrads in order to qualify for the study. Panelists who qualify for the full study will provide written informed consent as well as data on their ethnic background, age, and their habitual fat intake. Heights and weights will be measured.

After completing the screening tests and the demographic questions, panelists will receive 15 samples (for the first group: "All tastes sorting") or 12 samples (for the second group: "Bitters sorting"). When panelists receive the samples, they will be instructed to put on nose clips and keep the clips on for the duration of the test. Participants will be provided with water for rinsing their mouths as well as a cup to spit the samples into after tasting. Panelists will be provided with more water and additional spit cups as necessary. Next, panelists will be instructed to: "Taste each sample, spit it into the spit cup, and rinse with water. Then, sort the samples into groups you believe are similar. Groups may contain as many or as few samples as you desire. You may have as many or as few groups as you desire." Once they have decided on their groups, they will write in a description for each group and rate the group for its overall similarity. After finishing this initial sorting task, if panelists have more than two total groups, they will be instructed to select the two groups they believe are most similar to each other and combine them. If panelists still have more than two total groups, they will be instructed to combine the two most similar groups again. This will continue until panelists only have two groups remaining. At each level, panelists will rate the new, combined group for its overall similarity on a visual analog scale, as before.

Data from this sorting task will be compiled in to dissimilarity matrices for each participant, showing how many groups it took them before each sample was combined with each other sample. This data will be analyzed to determine if the fatty acid samples are similar or unique in sensation from other taste qualities.

Study Type Observational
Study Design Time Perspective: Cross-Sectional
Target Follow-Up Duration Not Provided
Biospecimen Not Provided
Sampling Method Probability Sample
Study Population Healthy men and women at least 18 years of age, not on any medication that alters taste sensation, and not allergic to dairy or nut products (samples contained a dairy protein and some sugars that were processed in facilities that also process nuts). Participants also had to pass a screening test to determine they could detect 0.5% linoleic acid emulsion compared to a blank solution.
Condition
  • Taste Qualities
  • Primary Tastes
Intervention Other: Tasting solutions
Participants will taste a variety of food grade compounds including: hexenoic acid, decenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, glucose, fructose, salt, citric acid, acetic acid, quinine, urea, caffeine, sucrose octaacetate, propylthiouracil, phenylthiocarbamide, monosodium glutamate, and inosine monophosphate.
Study Groups/Cohorts
  • Sorting all tastes
    This group will receive 15 samples to taste and sort into groups. The samples included: a blank solution, hexenoic acid, decenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, glucose, fructose, sodium chloride (2), citric acid, acetic acid, quinine, urea, monosodium glutamate, and inosine monophosphate.
    Intervention: Other: Tasting solutions
  • Sorting bitter tastes
    This group will receive 12 samples to taste and sort into groups. The samples included: blank solutions (2), decenoic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, quinine (2), urea (2),caffeine, sucrose octaacetate, and propylthiouracil.
    Intervention: Other: Tasting solutions
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status Completed
Actual Enrollment
 (submitted: May 11, 2015)
107
Original Estimated Enrollment
 (submitted: March 16, 2015)
150
Actual Study Completion Date March 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date March 2015   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy (self report), normal taste function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medication that alters taste sensation, failed to detect 0.5% linoleic acid emulsion, allergic to dairy or nuts
Sex/Gender
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers Yes
Contacts Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries United States
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number NCT02390180
Other Study ID Numbers 055040
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product Not Provided
IPD Sharing Statement Not Provided
Current Responsible Party Richard Mattes, Purdue University
Original Responsible Party Same as current
Current Study Sponsor Purdue University
Original Study Sponsor Same as current
Collaborators Not Provided
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Richard D Mattes, PhD Purdue University
PRS Account Purdue University
Verification Date May 2015