Working...
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Trial record 1 of 1 for:    NCT02202837
Previous Study | Return to List | Next Study

Study With Etanercept Focusing on Remission and Predictability of Remission in Real Life Clinical Practice (REACH RA)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02202837
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 29, 2014
Results First Posted : December 3, 2018
Last Update Posted : December 3, 2018
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Pfizer

Tracking Information
First Submitted Date July 15, 2014
First Posted Date July 29, 2014
Results First Submitted Date April 23, 2018
Results First Posted Date December 3, 2018
Last Update Posted Date December 3, 2018
Actual Study Start Date August 12, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date April 24, 2017   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Current Primary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: April 23, 2018)
  • Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) Less Than (<) 2.6 at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 6 up to Month 12 ]
    DAS28 was a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28 was calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender/painful joint count (TJC) using 28 joints count, C-reactive protein (CRP) (milligrams per liter [mg/L]) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hr]) levels and patient global assessment (PGA) of disease activity on a 0-100 mm scale (scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad], higher scores indicated worst health condition). DAS28 score range from 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity). DAS28 [less than or equal to] <=3.2 implied low disease activity and greater than (>) 3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 less than (<) 2.6 implied remission.
  • Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 3.3 at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 6 up to Month 12 ]
    The SDAI was the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, physician (evaluator) global assessment of disease (EGA) and PGA (assessed on a 0 mm [very well] to 10 mm [extremely bad] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition) and CRP (mg/dL). SDAI total score ranged from 0 (no disease activity) to 86 (maximal disease activity), where higher scores represents higher disease activity. SDAI >3.4 to 11 implied low disease activity, >11 to 26 implied moderate disease activity, >26 implied high disease activity and <=3.3 implied disease remission.
  • Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <=2.8 at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 6 up to Month 12 ]
    The CDAI was the numerical sum of four outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, EGA and PGA (assessed on a 0 mm [very well] to 10 mm [extremely bad] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition). CDAI total score ranged from 0-76 with higher scores indicating increased disease activity.
  • Percentage of Participants With Remission at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12 Based on American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) (Clinical Studies) Boolean Criterion [ Time Frame: Month 6 up to Month 12 ]
    The ACR/EULAR Boolean-based remission rate measured the severity of disease. A participant was considered as having achieved the Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission at a visit if all of the following 4 criteria were met at that visit: TJC (in 28 joints) <=1; SJC (in 28 joints) <=1; CRP<=1 mg/dl; PGA<=1 (assessed on a 0 mm [very well] to 10 mm [extremely bad] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition).
  • Percentage of Participants With Remission at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12 Based on American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) (Clinical Practice) Boolean Criterion [ Time Frame: Month 6 up to Month 12 ]
    The ACR/EULAR Boolean-based remission rate measured the severity of disease. A participant was considered as having achieved the Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission at a visit if all of the following 4 criteria were met at that visit: TJC (in 28 joints) <=1; SJC (in 28 joints) <=1 and PGA<=1 (assessed on a 0 mm [very well] to 10 mm [extremely bad] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition).
  • Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on Seven-Joint Ultrasound (US7) Measurements at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 6 up to Month 12 ]
    A participant was in remission based on US7: if US7 synovitis sum score in grey-scale Ultrasonography (GSUS) =0, Power Doppler Ultrasonography (PDUS) =0 and erosion sum score in GSUS=0. US7 score is musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MKUS) composite scoring system which combined soft tissue lesions (synovitis) and destructive processes (erosions) in a single scoring system. US7 score included MKUS examination of the following joints of the more clinically affected side: wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) II and III, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) II and III, metatarsophalangeal (MTP) II and V. The joints were examined by GSUS and PDUS for synovitis. Synovitis in GSUS and PDUS was analyzed on a scale of 0-3 (GSUS: 0=no synovitis, 3=severe synovitis; higher score=more synovitis); (PDUS: 0=no intraarticular color signal, 3 = >=50% of the intraarticular area filled with color signals). Erosions in GSUS and PDUS were calculated on a binary basis 0 and 1 where 0=no remission and remission=1.
  • Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) in Combination With Seven-Joint Ultrasound (US7) Measurement at Month 6 and Maintained Till Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 6 up to Month 12 ]
    Remission based on DAS28 + US7: DAS28 <2.6 and US7 synovitis sum score in GSUS=0, PDUS=0 and US7 erosion sum score in GSUS=0. DAS28: SJC + TJC in 28 joints count + CRP(mg/L) or ESR(mm/hr) levels and PGA on 0-100 mm scale (0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad], higher scores indicated worst health condition). U7 Remission: US7 synovitis sum score in GSUS=0, PDUS=0 and erosion sum score in GSUS=0. US7 score is MKUS composite scoring system which combined soft tissue lesions(synovitis) and destructive processes(erosions) in single scoring system. US7 score included MKUS examination of given joints: wrist, MCP II and III, PIP II and III, MTP II and V. Joints were examined by GSUS and PDUS for synovitis on scale of 0-3 (GSUS: 0=no synovitis, 3=severe synovitis; higher score=more synovitis); (PDUS: 0=no intraarticular color signal, 3 = >=50% of intraarticular area filled with color signals). Erosions in GSUS and PDUS were calculated on binary basis 0 (no remission) and 1 (remission).
Original Primary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: July 25, 2014)
  • Percentage of participants with Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) <2.6 at month 6 maintained till month 12 [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and patient's global assessment (PGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
  • Percentage of participants with Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤ 2.8 at month 6 maintained till month 12 [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    Clinical Disease Activity Index
  • Percentage of participants with Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤ 3.3 at month 6 maintained till month 12 [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    Simplified Disease Activity Index
  • Percentage of participants with no signs of ultrasound synovitis at month 6 (ultrasound remission) maintained till month 12 [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    US 7 Joint Score system
  • Percentage of participants with Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Boolean definition (SJC<1, TJC<1 and PtGA<1) at month 6 maintained till month 12 [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    Clinical Disease Activity Index
  • Percentage of participants with Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Boolean definition (SJC<1, TJC<1 and PtGA<1, CRP <1) at month 6 maintained till month 12 [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
    Simplified Disease Activity Index
Change History Complete list of historical versions of study NCT02202837 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Current Secondary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: April 23, 2018)
  • Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) <2.6 at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 3, 6, 9 and 12 ]
    DAS28 was a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) or ESR) (mm/hr) levels and PGA of disease activity on a 0-100 mm scale (scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad], higher scores indicated worst health condition). DAS28 score range from 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity). DAS28 <=3.2 implied low disease activity and > 3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 <2.6 implied remission.
  • Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) <=3.3 at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 3, 6, 9 and 12 ]
    The SDAI was the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, EGA and PGA (assessed on a 0 mm [very well] to 10 mm [extremely bad] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition) and CRP (mg/dL). SDAI total score ranged from 0 (no disease activity) to 86 (maximal disease activity), where higher scores represents higher disease activity. SDAI >3.4 to 11 implied low disease activity, >11 to 26 implied moderate disease activity, >26 implied high disease activity and <=3.3 implied disease remission.
  • Percentage of Participants With Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <=2.8 at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 3, 6, 9 and 12 ]
    The CDAI was the numerical sum of four outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, EGA and PGA (assessed on a 0 mm [very well] to 10 mm [extremely bad] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition). CDAI total score ranged from 0-76 with higher scores indicating increased disease activity.
  • Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) (Clinical Studies) Boolean Criterion at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 3, 6, 9 and 12 ]
    The ACR/EULAR Boolean-based remission rate measured the severity of disease. A participant was considered as having achieved the Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission at a visit if all of the following 4 criteria were met at that visit: TJC (in 28 joints) <=1; SJC (in 28 joints) <=1; CRP<=1 mg/dl; PGA<=1 (assessed on a 0 mm [very well] to 10 mm [extremely bad] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition).
  • Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) (Clinical Practice) Boolean Criterion at Month 3, 6, 9 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 3, 6, 9 and 12 ]
    The ACR/EULAR Boolean-based remission rate measured the severity of disease. A participant was considered as having achieved the Boolean-based ACR/EULAR remission at a visit if all of the following 4 criteria were met at that visit: TJC (in 28 joints) <=1; SJC (in 28 joints) <=1 and PGA<=1 (assessed on a 0 mm [very well] to 10 mm [extremely bad] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition).
  • Percentage of Participants With no Signs of Ultrasound Synovitis (Ultrasound Remission) at Month 6 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 6 and 12 ]
    A participant was in remission based on US7: if US7 synovitis sum score in GSUS =0, PDUS =0 and erosion sum score in GSUS=0. US7 score is MKUS composite scoring system which combined soft tissue lesions (synovitis) and destructive processes (erosions) in a single scoring system. US7 score included MKUS examination of the following joints of the more clinically affected side: wrist, MCP II and III, PIP II and III, MTP II and V. The joints were examined by GSUS and PDUS for synovitis. Synovitis in GSUS and PDUS was analyzed on a scale of 0-3 (GSUS: 0=no synovitis, 3=severe synovitis; higher score=more synovitis); (PDUS: 0=no intraarticular color signal, 3 = >=50% of the intraarticular area filled with color signals). Erosions in GSUS and PDUS were calculated on a binary basis 0 and 1 where 0=no remission and remission=1.
  • Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) in Combination With Seven-Joint Ultrasound (US7) Measurement at Month 6 and Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 6 and 12 ]
    Remission based on DAS28 + US7: DAS28 <2.6 and US7 synovitis sum score in GSUS=0, PDUS=0 and US7 erosion sum score in GSUS=0. DAS28: SJC + TJC in 28 joints count + CRP(mg/L) or ESR(mm/hr) levels and PGA on 0-100 mm scale (0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad], higher scores indicated worst health condition). U7 Remission: US7 synovitis sum score in GSUS=0, PDUS=0 and erosion sum score in GSUS=0. US7 score is MKUS composite scoring system which combined soft tissue lesions(synovitis) and destructive processes(erosions) in single scoring system. US7 score included MKUS examination of given joints: wrist, MCP II and III, PIP II and III, MTP II and V. Joints were examined by GSUS and PDUS for synovitis on scale of 0-3 (GSUS: 0=no synovitis, 3=severe synovitis; higher score=more synovitis); (PDUS: 0=no intraarticular color signal, 3 = >=50% of intraarticular area filled with color signals). Erosions in GSUS and PDUS were calculated on binary basis 0 (no remission) and 1 (remission).
  • Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) at Month 6 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12 ]
    DAS28 was a measure of disease activity in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. DAS28 was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) or ESR (mm/hr) levels and PGA of disease activity on a 0-100 mm scale (scores ranging from 0 mm [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad], higher scores indicated worst health condition). DAS28 score range from 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity). DAS28 <=3.2 implied low disease activity and > 3.2 to <=5.1 implied moderate disease activity, >5.1 implied high disease activity, and DAS28 <2.6 implied remission.
  • Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at Month 6 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12 ]
    The SDAI was the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, EGA and PGA (assessed on a 0 mm [very well] to 10 mm [extremely bad] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition) and CRP (mg/dL). SDAI total score ranged from 0 (no disease activity) to 86 (maximal disease activity), where higher scores represents higher disease activity. SDAI >3.4 to 11 implied low disease activity, >11 to 26 implied moderate disease activity, >26 implied high disease activity and <=3.3 implied disease remission.
  • Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Month 6 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12 ]
    The CDAI was the numerical sum of four outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, EGA and PGA (assessed on a 0 mm [very well] to 10 mm [extremely bad] scale; higher scores indicated worst health condition). CDAI total score ranged from 0-76 with higher scores indicating increased disease activity.
  • Change From Baseline in Seven-Joint Ultrasound (US7) Synovitis Grey-Scale Ultrasonography (GSUS) Score at Month 6 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12 ]
    US7 score was MKUS composite scoring system which combined soft tissue lesions (synovitis) and destructive processes (erosions) in a single scoring system. GSUS is a scoring system use to determine synovitis. The joints were examined by GSUS for synovitis from a dorsal and palmar aspect. The US7 synovitis sum score in GSUS was the sum of the scores for 9 following parts (wrist dorsal, wrist palmar, wrist ulnar, MCP 2 palmar, MCP 3 palmar, PIP 2 palmar, PIP 3 palmar, MTP 2 dorsal, MTP 5 dorsal) on a scale ranging from 0 =no synovitis to 3=severe synovitis. Total US7 GSUS score ranged from 0 (no synovitis) to 27 (severe synovitis), higher score= more synovitis.
  • Change From Baseline in Seven-Joint Ultrasound (US7) Synovitis Power Doppler Ultrasonography (PDUS) Score at Month 6 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12 ]
    US7 score was MKUS composite scoring system which combined soft tissue lesions (synovitis) and destructive processes (erosions) in a single scoring system. PDUS assessed the degree of synovial inflammation of the joints of both hands. The joints were examined by PDUS from a dorsal and palmar aspect. The US7 synovitis sum score in PDUS was the sum of the scores of 13 following parts (wrist dorsal, wrist palmar, wrist ulnar, MCP 2 palmar, MCP 2 dorsal, MCP 3 palmar, MCP 3 dorsal, PIP 2 palmar, PIP 2 dorsal, PIP 3 palmar, PIP 3 dorsal, MTP 2 dorsal, MTP 5 dorsal) on a scale ranging from 0=no intraarticular color signal to 3 = >=50% of the intraarticular area filled with color signals. Total US7 PSUS scores ranges from 0=no intraarticular color signal to 39 = >=50% of the intraarticular area filled with color signals; higher scores= more severe disease.
  • Change From Baseline in Seven-Joint Ultrasound (US7) Tenosynovitis/Paratenonitis Grey-Scale Ultrasonography (GSUS) Score at Month 6 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12 ]
    US7 score was MKUS composite scoring system which combined soft tissue lesions (synovitis and tenosynovitis/paratenonitis) and destructive processes (erosions) in a single scoring system. GSUS was a scoring system used to determine the tenosynovitis/paratenonitis. The joints were examined by GSUS from a dorsal and palmar aspect. The US7 tenosynovitis/paratenonitis sum score in GSUS was the sum of the scores for 7 following parts (wrist dorsal, wrist palmar, wrist ulnar, MCP 2 dorsal, MCP I2 palmar, MCP 3 dorsal, MCP 3 palmar) on a scale ranging from 0 =no synovitis to 1=severe synovitis. Total US7 tenosynovitis/paratenonitis GSUS score ranged from 0 (no synovitis) to 7 (severe synovitis), higher score= more synovitis.
  • Change From Baseline in Seven-Joint Ultrasound (US7) Tenosynovitis/Paratenonitis Power Doppler Ultrasonography (PDUS) Score at Month 6 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 12 ]
    US7 score was MKUS composite scoring system which combined soft tissue lesions (synovitis and tenosynovitis/paratenonitis) and destructive processes (erosions) in a single scoring system. PDUS assessed the degree of synovial inflammation of the joints of both hands. The joints were examined by PDUS from a dorsal and palmar aspect. The US7 tenosynovitis/paratenonitis sum score in PDUS was the sum of the scores for 7 following parts (wrist dorsal, wrist palmar, wrist ulnar, MCP 2 dorsal, MCP 2 palmar, MCP 3 dorsal, MCP 3 palmar) on a scale ranging from 0 =no synovitis to 1=severe synovitis. Total US7 tenosynovitis/paratenonitis PDUS score ranged from 0 (no synovitis) to 7 (severe synovitis), higher score= more synovitis.
  • Change From Baseline in Seven-Joint Ultrasound (US7) Erosion Grey-Scale Ultrasonography (GSUS) Score at Month 6 and 12 [ Time Frame: Month 6 and Month 12 ]
    US7 score was MKUS composite scoring system which combined soft tissue lesions (synovitis) and destructive processes (erosions) in a single scoring system. GSUS was a scoring system used to determine the erosions. The joints were examined by GSUS for erosions from a dorsal, palmar/plantar and radial/lateral (only MCP 2 and MTP 5) aspect. The US7 erosion sum score in GSUS was the sum of the 14 following scores (MCP 2 dorsal, MCP 2 palmar, MCP 2 radial, MCP 3 dorsal, MCP 3 palmar, PIP 2 dorsal, PIP 2 palmar, PIP 3 dorsal, PIP 3 palmar, MTP 2 dorsal, MTP 2 plantar, MTP 5 dorsal, MTP 5 plantar and MTP 5 lateral) ranging from 0 to 1. Total score ranged from 0 (no erosions) to 14 (severe erosions), higher score= more erosions. The score was based on measurements made at fingers and toes and were calculated for both left and right sides, the score of the clinically most affected side.
Original Secondary Outcome Measures
 (submitted: July 25, 2014)
  • Percentage of participants with Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) < 2.6 [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and patient's global assessment (PGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 ≤3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity.
  • Percentage of participants with Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤ 2.8 [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    Clinical Disease Activity Index
  • Percentage of participants with Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤ 3.3 [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    Simplified Disease Activity Index
  • Percentage of participants with no signs of ultrasound synovitis (ultrasound remission) [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    US 7 Joint score system
  • Percentage of participants with Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Boolean definition (SJC<1, TJC<1 and PtGA<1) [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    Clinical Disease Activity Index
  • Percentage of participants with Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Boolean definition (SJC<1, TJC<1 and PtGA<1, CRP <1) [ Time Frame: 6 months ]
    Simplified Disease Activity Index
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures Not Provided
 
Descriptive Information
Brief Title Study With Etanercept Focusing on Remission and Predictability of Remission in Real Life Clinical Practice
Official Title Defining Which Remission Criterion At Month 6 Predicts Remission At Month 12 In A Real Life Clinical Practice, In A Cohort Of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated With Etanercept (Enbrel (Registered))
Brief Summary Defining Which Remission Criterion at Month 6 Predicts Remission at Month 12 in a Real Life Clinical Practice, in a Cohort of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Etanercept
Detailed Description

The analysis of the primary endpoint will be based on a logistic regression defining the dependent variable as the remission at Month 12 and the 5 independent variables as CDAI, SDAI, DAS28, DAS28 and Ultrasound, and EULAR Boolean definition for clinical practice and clinical studies.

This analysis will be conducted in each arm of the study as well as after a pooling of both patient groups.

In this context it seems reasonable to ensure the completion of the study by a total approximate number of 100 patients (approximately 50 patients per arm). In order to ensure 50 completers in each arm, 70 patients will be recruited at baseline, taking into account a drop out rate of 30% over 1 year period.

Study Type Observational
Study Design Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Prospective
Target Follow-Up Duration Not Provided
Biospecimen Not Provided
Sampling Method Non-Probability Sample
Study Population Adult patients presenting with moderate-to-severe RA in daily clinical practice
Condition Rheumatoid Arthritis
Intervention Drug: etanercept
etanercept 1 x 50 mg/week or 2 x 25mg/week
Study Groups/Cohorts
  • Etanercept First
    Adult patients with RA who receive etanercept as first biologic, according to prevailing Belgian reimbursement criteria
    Intervention: Drug: etanercept
  • Etanercept second
    Adult patients who receive etanercept as second biologic, according to prevailing Belgian reimbursement criteria
    Intervention: Drug: etanercept
Publications * Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Recruitment Information
Recruitment Status Completed
Actual Enrollment
 (submitted: April 23, 2018)
157
Original Estimated Enrollment
 (submitted: July 25, 2014)
140
Actual Study Completion Date April 24, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date April 24, 2017   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with active RA who start treatment with etanercept according to the prevailing reimbursement criteria and dosing in line with the SmPC.

    1. First cohort: Etanercept is the first biological product prescribed.
    2. Second cohort: Etanercept is the second biological product prescribed.
  2. Capable of understanding and willing to provide signed and dated written, voluntary informed consent before any protocol-specific procedures are performed.
  3. Eighteen (18) years of age or older at time of consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. History of or current psychiatric illness that would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with protocol requirements or to give informed consent.

Sex/Gender
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
Ages 18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers No
Contacts Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Listed Location Countries Belgium
Removed Location Countries  
 
Administrative Information
NCT Number NCT02202837
Other Study ID Numbers B1801378
B1801378 ( Other Identifier: Alias Study Number )
REACH-RA ( Other Identifier: Alias Study Number )
Has Data Monitoring Committee No
U.S. FDA-regulated Product Not Provided
IPD Sharing Statement Not Provided
Responsible Party Pfizer
Study Sponsor Pfizer
Collaborators Not Provided
Investigators
Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center Pfizer
PRS Account Pfizer
Verification Date April 2018