Restorelle® Mesh Versus Native Tissue Repair for Prolapse
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02162615 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : June 13, 2014
Last Update Posted : January 27, 2022
|
Sponsor:
Coloplast A/S
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Coloplast A/S
Tracking Information | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date | June 11, 2014 | ||||||
First Posted Date | June 13, 2014 | ||||||
Last Update Posted Date | January 27, 2022 | ||||||
Actual Study Start Date | August 2014 | ||||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | January 15, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
Current Primary Outcome Measures |
|
||||||
Original Primary Outcome Measures | Same as current | ||||||
Change History | |||||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures |
|
||||||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures | Same as current | ||||||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures |
|
||||||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Same as current | ||||||
Descriptive Information | |||||||
Brief Title | Restorelle® Mesh Versus Native Tissue Repair for Prolapse | ||||||
Official Title | Restorelle® Transvaginal Mesh Versus Native Tissue Repair for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Restorelle 522 Study | ||||||
Brief Summary | The purpose of this study is to collect information on the safety and effectiveness of Restorelle Direct Fix mesh and the surgical procedure to implant Restorelle. These results will be compared to the safety and effectiveness results in patients who have native tissue repair (without mesh) as their pelvic organ prolapse treatment. | ||||||
Detailed Description | Not Provided | ||||||
Study Type | Observational | ||||||
Study Design | Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective |
||||||
Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | ||||||
Biospecimen | Not Provided | ||||||
Sampling Method | Non-Probability Sample | ||||||
Study Population | Adult female patients with pelvic organ prolapse who are candidates for transvaginal surgical repair. | ||||||
Condition | Pelvic Organ Prolapse | ||||||
Intervention |
|
||||||
Study Groups/Cohorts |
|
||||||
Publications * | Not Provided | ||||||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
|||||||
Recruitment Information | |||||||
Recruitment Status | Completed | ||||||
Actual Enrollment |
810 | ||||||
Original Estimated Enrollment |
892 | ||||||
Actual Study Completion Date | November 6, 2021 | ||||||
Actual Primary Completion Date | January 15, 2020 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | ||||||
Eligibility Criteria | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
||||||
Sex/Gender |
|
||||||
Ages | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | ||||||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | ||||||
Contacts | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | ||||||
Listed Location Countries | Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Netherlands, United States | ||||||
Removed Location Countries | |||||||
Administrative Information | |||||||
NCT Number | NCT02162615 | ||||||
Other Study ID Numbers | SU014 | ||||||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | ||||||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product |
|
||||||
IPD Sharing Statement | Not Provided | ||||||
Current Responsible Party | Coloplast A/S | ||||||
Original Responsible Party | Same as current | ||||||
Current Study Sponsor | Coloplast A/S | ||||||
Original Study Sponsor | Same as current | ||||||
Collaborators | Not Provided | ||||||
Investigators |
|
||||||
PRS Account | Coloplast A/S | ||||||
Verification Date | January 2022 |