May 7, 2014
|
May 9, 2014
|
August 15, 2022
|
April 2014
|
December 2022 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
- Overall survival (OS) (Undetectable Plasma EBV DNA Cohort Phase III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm. Their distributions will be compared between treatment arms with a 1-sided log rank test. The confidence interval approach will be used for the final analysis of OS.
- Progression-free survival (PFS) (Detectable Plasma EBV DNA Cohort Phase II) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm. Their distributions will be compared between treatment arms with a 1-sided log rank test. A one-sided log rank test will be used to compare the PFS at a significance level of 0.1379.
|
- Progression-free survival (PFS) (Detectable Plasma EBV DNA Cohort Phase II) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm. Their distributions will be compared between treatment arms with a 1-sided log rank test. A one-sided log rank test will be used to compare the PFS at a significance level of 0.1379.
- Overall survival (OS) (Undetectable Plasma EBV DNA Cohort Phase III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm. Their distributions will be compared between treatment arms with a 1-sided log rank test. The confidence interval approach will be used for the final analysis of OS.
|
|
- Changes in pure tone audiometry (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Baseline to up to 1 year ]
Correlation between categorical measures will be summarized by odds ratios, chi-square tests, and associated measures. Adjusted correlation may be derived from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models or derived directly using nonparametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) models if normality assumption is violated. Correlations between HHIE-S PRO scores and PTA and FACT-NP hearing, and PTA will be compared as dependent statistics
- Changes in QOL (hearing) as assessed by the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening version (HHIE-S) (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Baseline to up to 24 months ]
QOL analysis including overall score and change from baseline will be summarized using mean and standard deviation at each time point for each arm. Overall and nasopharyngeal-specific QOL, hearing QOL (FACT-NP hearing domain, HHIE-S scores), peripheral neuropathy QOL over the short and long term and pure-tone audiometry (PTA) scores will be compared using a two sample independent t test and paired t test if the comparison is within the experimental arm between different time points.
- Changes in QOL (peripheral neuropathy) as assessed by the FACT-Taxane (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Baseline to up to 24 months ]
- Changes in quality of life (QOL) (general and physical well-being) assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Nasopharyngeal (NP) (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Baseline to up to 24 months ]
Changes in patient reported outcome (PRO) scores will be correlated to clearance or non-clearance of EBV titers. Descriptive statistics derived from FACT-NP will be used to enrich the understanding of QOL as it pertains to the 2 phase III arms of observation versus additional adjuvant chemotherapy. Univariable and multivariable analysis will be performed using the Cox proportional hazards model for OS and distant metastasis. Pearson correlation will be estimated between general and physical well-being. QOL measures and change from baseline will be correlated to EBV DNA.
- Cost effectiveness as assessed by the health-related QOL (HRQOL) from the EuroQol (EQ-5D) instrument (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 24 months ]
Incremental cost effectiveness ratios will be compared to determine the probability of cost effectiveness of various interventions, with sensitivity analyses to identify model weaknesses. The expected value of perfect information will be determined to delimit the upper boundary for cost-effective future investment in this area of research.
- Incidence of acute grade 3-5 adverse events (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Rates of specific acute toxicity profiles and late toxicity profiles will be estimated using a binomial distribution along with their associated 95% confidence intervals and will be compared using Fisher's exact test between the 2 treatment arms.
- Incidence of death (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 30 days of end of protocol treatment ]
- Incidence of late grade 3-5 adverse events (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Rates of specific acute toxicity profiles and late toxicity profiles will be estimated using a binomial distribution along with their associated 95% confidence intervals and will be compared using Fisher's exact test between the 2 treatment arms.
- OS (Detectable Plasma EBV DNA Cohort Phase II) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm. Their distributions will be compared between treatment arms with a 1-sided log rank test.
- PFS (Undetectable Plasma EBV DNA Cohort Phase III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm. Their distributions will be compared between treatment arms with a 1-sided log rank test.
- Time to distant metastasis (DM) (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
The cumulative incidence method will be used to estimate local, regional, and distant failure rates. The failure rates for the experimental treatment will be compared against the control using a failure-specific log-rank test. Multivariate analysis will be performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
- Time to local progression (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
The cumulative incidence method will be used to estimate local, regional, and distant failure rates. The failure rates for the experimental treatment will be compared against the control using a failure-specific log-rank test. Multivariate analysis will be performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
- Time to regional progression (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Defined as an estimated increase in the size of the tumor (product of the perpendicular diameters of the two largest dimensions) of greater than 25%, taking as reference the smallest value of all previous measurements or appearance of new areas of malignant disease. The cumulative incidence method will be used to estimate local, regional, and distant failure rates. The failure rates for the experimental treatment will be compared against the control using a failure-specific log-rank test. Multivariate analysis will be performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
|
- Time to distant metastasis (DM) (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
The cumulative incidence method will be used to estimate local, regional, and distant failure rates. The failure rates for the experimental treatment will be compared against the control using a failure-specific log-rank test. Multivariate analysis will be performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
- Time to local progression (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
The cumulative incidence method will be used to estimate local, regional, and distant failure rates. The failure rates for the experimental treatment will be compared against the control using a failure-specific log-rank test. Multivariate analysis will be performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
- Time to regional progression (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Defined as an estimated increase in the size of the tumor (product of the perpendicular diameters of the two largest dimensions) of greater than 25%, taking as reference the smallest value of all previous measurements or appearance of new areas of malignant disease. The cumulative incidence method will be used to estimate local, regional, and distant failure rates. The failure rates for the experimental treatment will be compared against the control using a failure-specific log-rank test. Multivariate analysis will be performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.
- PFS (Undetectable Plasma EBV DNA Cohort Phase III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm. Their distributions will be compared between treatment arms with a 1-sided log rank test.
- OS (Detectable Plasma EBV DNA Cohort Phase II) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each arm. Their distributions will be compared between treatment arms with a 1-sided log rank test.
- Incidence of acute grade 3-5 adverse events (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Rates of specific acute toxicity profiles and late toxicity profiles will be estimated using a binomial distribution along with their associated 95% confidence intervals and will be compared using Fisher's exact test between the 2 treatment arms.
- Incidence of late grade 3-5 adverse events (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 7 years ]
Rates of specific acute toxicity profiles and late toxicity profiles will be estimated using a binomial distribution along with their associated 95% confidence intervals and will be compared using Fisher's exact test between the 2 treatment arms.
- Incidence of death (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 30 days of end of protocol treatment ]
- Changes in pure tone audiometry (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Baseline to up to 1 year ]
Correlation between categorical measures will be summarized by odds ratios, chi-square tests, and associated measures. Adjusted correlation may be derived from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models or derived directly using nonparametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) models if normality assumption is violated. Correlations between HHIE-S PRO scores and PTA and FACT-NP hearing, and PTA will be compared as dependent statistics
- Changes in quality of life (QOL) (general and physical well-being) assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Nasopharyngeal (NP) (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Baseline to up to 24 months ]
Changes in patient reported outcome (PRO) scores will be correlated to clearance or non-clearance of EBV titers. Descriptive statistics derived from FACT-NP will be used to enrich the understanding of QOL as it pertains to the 2 phase III arms of observation versus additional adjuvant chemotherapy. Univariable and multivariable analysis will be performed using the Cox proportional hazards model for OS and distant metastasis. Pearson correlation will be estimated between general and physical well-being. QOL measures and change from baseline will be correlated to EBV DNA.
- Changes in QOL (hearing) as assessed by the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-Screening version (HHIE-S) (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Baseline to up to 24 months ]
QOL analysis including overall score and change from baseline will be summarized using mean and standard deviation at each time point for each arm. Overall and nasopharyngeal-specific QOL, hearing QOL (FACT-NP hearing domain, HHIE-S scores), peripheral neuropathy QOL over the short and long term and pure-tone audiometry (PTA) scores will be compared using a two sample independent t test and paired t test if the comparison is within the experimental arm between different time points.
- Changes in QOL (peripheral neuropathy) as assessed by the FACT-Taxane (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Baseline to up to 24 months ]
- Cost effectiveness as assessed by the health-related QOL (HRQOL) from the EuroQol (EQ-5D) instrument (Phase II and III) [ Time Frame: Up to 24 months ]
Incremental cost effectiveness ratios will be compared to determine the probability of cost effectiveness of various interventions, with sensitivity analyses to identify model weaknesses. The expected value of perfect information will be determined to delimit the upper boundary for cost-effective future investment in this area of research.
|
Not Provided
|
Not Provided
|
|
Individualized Treatment in Treating Patients With Stage II-IVB Nasopharyngeal Cancer Based on EBV DNA
|
Randomized Phase II and Phase III Studies of Individualized Treatment for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Biomarker Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA)
|
There are two study questions we are asking in this randomized phase II/III trial based on a blood biomarker, Epstein Barr virus (EBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) for locoregionally advanced non-metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer. All patients will first undergo standard concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. When this standard treatment is completed, if there is no detectable EBV DNA in their plasma, then patients are randomized to either standard adjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy or observation. If there is still detectable levels of plasma EBV DNA, patients will be randomized to standard cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy versus gemcitabine and paclitaxel. Radiation therapy uses high energy x rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, fluorouracil, gemcitabine hydrochloride, and paclitaxel work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether giving cisplatin and fluorouracil is more effective than gemcitabine hydrochloride and paclitaxel after radiation therapy in treating patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.
|
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine whether substituting adjuvant concurrent high dose cisplatin (CDDP) and fluorouracil (5-FU) with gemcitabine (gemcitabine hydrochloride) and paclitaxel will result in superior progression-free survival. (Detectable Plasma Epstein Barr Virus [EBV] Deoxyribonucleic Acid [DNA] Cohort randomized Phase II) II. To determine whether omitting adjuvant CDDP and 5-FU (observation alone in the adjuvant setting) will result in non-inferior overall survival as compared with those patients receiving adjuvant CDDP and 5-FU chemotherapy. (Undetectable Plasma EBV DNA Cohort Phase III)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Time to distant metastasis. (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) II. Time to local progression. (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) III. Time to regional progression. (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) IV. Progression-free survival (Undetectable Cohort). V. Overall survival (Detectable Cohort). VI. Acute and late toxicity profiles based on clinician-reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version (v.) 4. (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) VII. Death during or within 30 days of end of protocol treatment. (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) VIII. Quality of life (general and physical well-being). (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) IX. Quality of life (hearing). (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) X. Quality of life (peripheral neuropathy). (Randomized Phase II and Phase III) XI. Cost effectiveness. (Randomized Phase II and Phase III)
OUTLINE:
Patients undergo intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) once daily (QD) 5 days a week for 6.5 weeks and receive low-dose cisplatin intravenously (IV) over 30-60 minutes once weekly during IMRT. Beginning 1 week after chemoradiation, plasma samples are collected for EBV DNA analysis.
PHASE II: Patients with detectable EBV DNA from pre-treatment analysis are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients receive PF regimen comprising cisplatin IV over 60-120 minutes and fluorouracil IV over 96 hours continuously beginning at least 4 weeks after completion of IMRT. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 3 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II: Patients receive GT regimen comprising paclitaxel IV over 1 hour and gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 at least 4 weeks after completion of IMRT. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
PHASE III:
Patients with undetectable EBV DNA from pre-treatment analysis are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM III: Patients receive PF regimen as in Arm I.
ARM IV: Patients undergo clinical observation.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 4 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
|
Interventional
|
Phase 2 Phase 3
|
Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: None (Open Label) Primary Purpose: Treatment
|
- Epstein-Barr Virus Infection
- Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Stage III Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Stage IVA Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- Stage IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
|
|
- Active Comparator: Arm I (chemoradiation, cisplatin, fluorouracil)
Patients receive PF regimen comprising cisplatin IV over 60-120 minutes and fluorouracil IV over 96 hours continuously beginning at least 4 weeks after completion of IMRT. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 3 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Interventions:
- Drug: Cisplatin
- Drug: Fluorouracil
- Radiation: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
- Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
- Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment
- Experimental: Arm II (chemoradiation, gemcitabine hydrochloride, paclitaxel)
Patients receive GT regimen comprising paclitaxel IV over 1 hour and gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 at least 4 weeks after completion of IMRT. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Interventions:
- Drug: Cisplatin
- Drug: Gemcitabine Hydrochloride
- Radiation: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
- Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
- Drug: Paclitaxel
- Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment
- Active Comparator: Arm III (chemoradiation, cisplatin, fluorouracil)
Patients receive PF regimen as in Arm I of Phase II.
Interventions:
- Drug: Cisplatin
- Drug: Fluorouracil
- Radiation: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
- Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
- Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment
- Experimental: Arm IV (chemoradiation, observation)
Patients undergo clinical observation.
Interventions:
- Drug: Cisplatin
- Other: Clinical Observation
- Radiation: Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy
- Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
- Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment
|
Not Provided
|
|
Recruiting
|
758
|
924
|
July 2026
|
December 2022 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
|
Inclusion Criteria:
- Biopsy proven (from primary lesion and/or lymph nodes) diagnosis of cancer of the nasopharynx
-
Sites are required to complete Step 1 registration before submitting specimens for EBV DNA analysis.
- Patients must have detectable pretreatment plasma EBV DNA, determined by the central lab prior to Step 2 registration (see Section 10.2 for details of specimen submission).
- For patients who have detectable plasma EBV DNA tested at one of the credentialed central labs (listed on the EBV DNA Testing Specimen Transmittal form) within 28 days prior to Step 1 registration: that test result can be used for eligibility without the need for re-testing. To use this test result for eligibility, the central lab must enter the test result through the pathology portal, and the site must follow the instructions in Section 5.4.
-
Stage II-IVB disease (AJCC, 7th ed.) with no evidence of distant metastasis, based upon the following minimum diagnostic workup:
- History/physical examination by a Medical Oncologist or Clinical Oncologist or Radiation Oncologist or ENT, which must include an endoscopic evaluation, a complete list of current medications, and assessment of weight and weight loss in the past 6 months within 21 days prior to registration;
- Evaluation of tumor extent required within 28 days prior to registration:
- MRI of the nasopharynx and neck; or CT of the nasopharynx and neck with ≤ 3 mm contiguous slices with contrast and bone windows (to evaluate base of skull involvement).
Note: If a treatment planning CT scan is used, it must be with ≤ 3 mm contiguous slices with contrast and be read by a radiologist.
Please refer to section 6.3.2 for MRI requirement for target delineation.
Exclusion Criteria:
|
Sexes Eligible for Study: |
All |
|
18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
|
No
|
|
Australia, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Puerto Rico, Singapore, Taiwan, United States
|
|
|
NCT02135042
|
NRG-HN001 NCI-2014-00635 ( Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) ) NRG-HN001 ( Other Identifier: NRG Oncology ) NRG-HN001 ( Other Identifier: CTEP ) U10CA180868 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract ) U10CA021661 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )
|
Yes
|
Not Provided
|
Not Provided
|
NRG Oncology
|
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
|
NRG Oncology
|
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
|
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
|
Principal Investigator: |
Nancy Lee |
NRG Oncology |
|
NRG Oncology
|
August 2022
|