Sedation vs. Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment (SIESTA)
| Tracking Information | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Received Date ICMJE | April 23, 2014 | |||
| Last Updated Date | May 22, 2016 | |||
| Start Date ICMJE | April 2014 | |||
| Primary Completion Date | February 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
| Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) after 24 hours [ Time Frame: 24 hours ] Neurological improvement of NIHSS 24 hours after intervention |
|||
| Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | |||
| Change History | Complete list of historical versions of study NCT02126085 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site | |||
| Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
|||
| Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
|||
| Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE |
|
|||
| Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE | Same as current | |||
| Descriptive Information | ||||
| Brief Title ICMJE | Sedation vs. Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment | |||
| Official Title ICMJE | Sedation vs. Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment | |||
| Brief Summary | Sedation vs Intubation for Endovascular Stroke TreAtment Trial (SIESTA) is a prospective, randomised controlled, monocentric, two-armed, comparative trial. Patients are randomized 1 : 1 to either non-intubated state or to intubated state for endovascular stroke treatment. Otherwise, no principal differences in intensive care treatment are intended, and standard operating procedures are applied to ensure uniform management decisions in fields such as ventilation, sedation, cardio-vascular and cerebral monitoring and management. | |||
| Detailed Description | Early recanalization is an important, if not the most important, factor concerning reconstitution of patients´ health in ischaemic stroke. This is the reason why patients with extended stroke are increasingly subjected to an endovascular stroke therapy (EST). Matter of ongoing debate is how to sedate these patients during intervention. Some clinicians prefer an intubation due to a reduction of patients´movements and therefore potentially lowering complication rates (injury by catheter, aspiration e.g.). On the other hand retrospective investigations hypothesize that general anaesthesia is associated with peri-interventional hypotension followed by poorer clinical outcome. The best anaesthaesiologic management in endovascular stroke therapy to this point of time is not known. The investigators therefore designed this study comparing intubated state with general anaesthesia vs. non-intubated state with conscious sedation during EST, focusing on patients´ outcome. |
|||
| Study Type ICMJE | Interventional | |||
| Study Phase | Not Provided | |||
| Study Design ICMJE | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
|||
| Condition ICMJE | Acute Ischemic Stroke | |||
| Intervention ICMJE | Procedure: Endovascular recanalisation
Endovascular recanalisation by mechanical thrombectomy with e.g. stent retriever device, possibly following intravenous thrombolysis within a "bridging concept" |
|||
| Study Arms |
|
|||
| Publications * |
|
|||
|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
||||
| Recruitment Information | ||||
| Recruitment Status ICMJE | Completed | |||
| Enrollment ICMJE | 150 | |||
| Completion Date | May 2016 | |||
| Primary Completion Date | February 2016 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
| Eligibility Criteria ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
|
|||
| Sex/Gender |
|
|||
| Ages | 18 Years and older (Adult, Senior) | |||
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | |||
| Contacts ICMJE | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | |||
| Listed Location Countries ICMJE | Germany | |||
| Removed Location Countries | ||||
| Administrative Information | ||||
| NCT Number ICMJE | NCT02126085 | |||
| Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE | SIESTA | |||
| Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | |||
| U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | |||
| IPD Sharing Statement | Not Provided | |||
| Responsible Party | Dr. Silvia Schönenberger, MD, University Hospital Heidelberg | |||
| Study Sponsor ICMJE | University Hospital Heidelberg | |||
| Collaborators ICMJE | Not Provided | |||
| Investigators ICMJE |
|
|||
| PRS Account | University Hospital Heidelberg | |||
| Verification Date | May 2016 | |||
|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP |
||||


IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. 
