We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Phase 2, 2-Stage, 2-Cohort Study of Talazoparib (BMN 673), in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With BRCA Mutation (ABRAZO Study) (ABRAZO)

This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02034916
First Posted: January 14, 2014
Last Update Posted: November 6, 2017
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Collaborators:
Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.
Medivation, Inc.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Pfizer
January 9, 2014
January 14, 2014
September 1, 2017
November 6, 2017
November 6, 2017
December 2013
September 2016   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Objective Response Rate (ORR) [ Time Frame: From randomization until data cutoff date (01 Sep 2016) ]
ORR: Percentage of participants with a confirmed best overall complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target and non-target lesions, including target and non-target lymph nodes reduction to less than (<) 10 millimeter (mm) in short axis. PR: Greater than or equal to (>=) 30 percent (%) decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, compared to the sum at baseline. Response evaluation was done by an independent radiology facility (IRF).
Determine Objective Response Rate (ORR) for each cohort [ Time Frame: Anticipated in about 24-30 months following first patient enrolled ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT02034916 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Clinical Benefit Rate-24 (CBR-24) [ Time Frame: From randomization until data cutoff date (01 Sep 2016) ]
    CBR24: Percentage of participants with a best response of CR, PR or stable disease (SD) sustained for at least 24 weeks, as assessed by IRF using RECIST 1.1. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target and non-target lesions, including target and non-target lymph nodes reduction to <10 mm in short axis. PR: >=30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, compared to the sum at baseline. SD: Neither PR nor progression of disease (PD) criteria met. SD follow PR only when sum increases by less than 20% from the nadir, but previously seen 30% decrease from baseline no longer hold. PD: >=20% increase (>=5 mm absolute increase) in the sum of target lesion measurements, compared to the smallest sum on study (including baseline), or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, evaluated as a whole, such that it is clear that treatment has failed and disease is progressing, regardless of the status of the target lesions.
  • Duration of Response (DOR) [ Time Frame: From first documentation of CR or PR until PD, last tumor assessment without PD before new anticancer treatment initiation or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to the data cutoff date [01 Sep 2016]) ]
    DOR: Time from first documentation of CR or PR, to PD by IRF assessment using RECIST 1.1, or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target and non-target lesions, with target and non-target lymph nodes reduction to <10 mm in short axis. PR: >=30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, compared to the sum at baseline. PD: >=20% increase (>=5 mm absolute increase) in the sum of target lesion measurements, compared to the smallest sum on study (including baseline), or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, evaluated as a whole, such that it is clear that treatment has failed and disease is progressing, regardless of the status of the target lesions. Participants with no PD or death at the analysis date were censored at last tumor assessment date prior to on or before initiation of a new anticancer therapy or before the data cutoff date.
  • Progression Free Survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: From first dose of study drug until PD, last tumor assessment without PD before new anticancer treatment initiation or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to the data cutoff date [01 Sep 2016]) ]
    PFS was defined as the time in months from the first dose of study drug to the first documentation of PD by investigator assessment using RECIST 1.1 or death on study due to any cause on or before the data cutoff date, whichever occurred first. PD: >=20% increase (>=5 mm absolute increase) in the sum of target lesion measurements, compared to the smallest sum on study (including baseline), or unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, evaluated as a whole, such that it is clear that treatment has failed and disease is progressing, regardless of the status of the target lesions. Participants with no PFS event at the analysis were censored at last tumor assessment date prior to data cutoff or date of new anticancer treatment initiation, whichever occurred first.
  • Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: From first dose of study drug until death due to any cause (up to the data cutoff date [01 Sep 2016]) ]
    OS was defined as the time from first dose of study drug to death due to any cause. For participants without a death date at the time of data cutoff or permanently lost to follow-up, OS was right-censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive on or before the data cutoff date.
  • Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or before initiation of a new anticancer treatment, whichever occurred first (up to data cutoff date [01 Sep 2016]) ]
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; an important medical event or reaction, including events requiring medical intervention to prevent worsening to any of the previously noted seriousness criteria . A treatment emergent AE was defined as an event that emerged during the treatment period that was absent before treatment, or worsened during the treatment period relative to the pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.
  • Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or before initiation of a new anticancer treatment, whichever occurred first (up to data cutoff date [01 Sep 2016]) ]
    A treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. A treatment-related SAE was a treatment-related AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly; an important medical event or reaction, including events requiring medical intervention to prevent worsening to any of the previously noted seriousness criteria.
  • Number of Participants With Outcome in Response to Adverse Events (AEs) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or before initiation of a new anticancer treatment, whichever occurred first (up to data cutoff date [01 Sep 2016]) ]
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Outcome of an AE was response to a question answered by the investigator: 'Is the AE leading to study discontinuation or death?' as 'yes'.
  • Number of Participants With Toxicity Grades Increase of 2 or More in Laboratory Parameters [ Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or before initiation of a new anticancer treatment, whichever occurred first (up to data cutoff date [01 Sep 2016]) ]
    Laboratory tests included hematology (hemoglobin [low], leucocytes [low], lymphocytes [low], neutrophils [low], platelets [low]) and serum chemistry (alanine aminotransferase [high], albumin [low], alkaline phosphatase [high], aspartate aminotransferase [high], bilirubin [high], calcium [low], glucose [high], magnesium [low], phosphate [low], potassium [high], potassium [low], sodium [high], sodium [low]). Toxicity grades were evaluated based on national cancer institute- common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. Number of participants with increase of 2 or more CTCAE toxicity grades above baseline, for hematology and chemistry laboratory parameters is reported in this outcome measure.
  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs [ Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or before initiation of a new anticancer treatment, whichever occurred first (up to data cutoff date [01 Sep 2016]) ]
    Criteria for clinically significant vital sign changes: 1) Blood pressure: systolic blood pressure (SBP): >=30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) increase from baseline, diastolic blood pressure (DBP): >=20 mmHg decrease from baseline; 2) Heart rate (HR): absolute HR > 120 beats per minute (bpm) and >30 bpm increase from baseline, absolute HR <50 bpm and >20 bpm decrease from baseline; 3) Weight: >10% decrease from baseline. Number of participants with any clinically significant change in abnormalities for blood pressure, heart rate and weight are reported in this outcome measure.
  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Physical Findings [ Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug or before initiation of a new anticancer treatment, whichever occurred first (up to data cutoff date [01 Sep 2016]) ]
    Physical examination included examination of the head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, skin, heart and lung examinations, lymph nodes, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and neurological systems. The examination assessed the participants for any potential changes in general appearance, the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, as well as towards participant reported symptoms. Findings were considered to be clinically significant based on investigator's decision.
  • Number of Participants With Atleast 1 Concomitant Medication [ Time Frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after the last dose or before initiation of a new anticancer treatment, whichever occurred first (up to the data cutoff date [01 Sep 2016]) ]
    Number of participants taking any non-study medications, therapies, including herbal supplements during the treatment-emergent period for the management of an adverse event or for the treatment of any other disease.
  • Trough Concentration Versus Time Summary of Talazoparib [ Time Frame: Predose on Day 1 of Cycle 1, 2, 3 and 4 ]
    Concentrations below the limit of quantitation values less than or equal to (<=) 25 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL) were set as zero. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was not done separately for each reporting arm and cohorts were combined for PK analysis.
  • Clinical benefit response (CBR) rate defined as CR + PR + SD lasting ≥ 24 weeks [ Time Frame: Anticipated in about 24-30 months following first patient enrolled ]
  • Duration of response (DOR) for objective responders [ Time Frame: Anticipated in about 24-30 months following first patient enrolled ]
  • Progression Free Survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: Anticipated in about 24-30 months following first patient enrolled ]
  • Overall Survival (OS) [ Time Frame: Anticipated in about 24-30 months following first patient enrolled ]
  • Time to Deterioration in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) and Functional Status as Assessed by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to death, disease progression or end of treatment (30 days after last dose of study drug or before initiation of a new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first [up to data cutoff date: 01 Sep 2016]) ]
    Time to deterioration was defined as the time from baseline to day to death, first occurrence of progression, or a >=10 point change from baseline in any of the functional status score and global health status/QOL score based on the EORTC-QLQ-C30, whichever occurred first. EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire is a standardized instrument developed to assess the quality of life of people with cancer. EORTC-QLQ-C30 functional subscale includes 5 items: physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning. All of the single items of functional status subscale measures and global health status/QOL subscale range from 0 to 100, where higher scores represent a better level of functioning/quality of life.
  • Time to Deterioration in Disease Specific Symptoms as Assessed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module (EORTC-QLQ-BR23) [ Time Frame: Baseline up to death, disease progression or end of treatment (30 days after last dose of study drug or before initiation of a new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first [up to data cutoff date: 01 Sep 2016]) ]
    Time to deterioration was defined as the time from baseline to day to death, first occurrence of progression, or a >=10 point change from baseline in any of the symptom score based on the EORTC-QLQ-BR23, whichever occurred first. EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a disease-specific module for breast cancer developed as a supplement for the EORTC-QLQ-C30 to assess the quality of life of participants with breast cancer. EORTC-QLQ-BR23 symptoms subscale includes 4 items: systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss. Each item is rated by choosing 1 of 4 possible responses that record the level of intensity (1= not at all, 2= a little, 3= quite a bit, and 4= very much) within each scale.
Health-related quality of life [ Time Frame: Anticipated in about 24-30 months following first patient enrolled ]
 
A Phase 2, 2-Stage, 2-Cohort Study of Talazoparib (BMN 673), in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients With BRCA Mutation (ABRAZO Study)
A Phase 2, 2-stage, 2-cohort Study Of Talazoparib (Bmn 673) Administered To Germline Brca Mutation Subjects With Locally Advanced And/or Metastatic Breast Cancer

The purpose of this 2-stage, 2-cohort Phase 2 trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of talazoparib (also known as BMN 673) in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with a deleterious germline BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutation. Subjects will be assigned to either Cohort 1 or 2 based on prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease:

  • Cohort 1) Subjects with a documented PR or CR to a prior platinum-containing regimen for metastatic disease with disease progression > 8 weeks following the last dose of platinum; or
  • Cohort 2) Subjects who have received > 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease and who have had no prior platinum therapy for metastatic disease
Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 2
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • BRCA 1 Gene Mutation
  • BRCA 2 Gene Mutation
Drug: talazoparib
Other Names:
  • MDV3800
  • BMN673
Experimental: talazoparib

Cohort 1) Subjects with a documented PR or CR to a prior platinum-containing regimen for metastatic disease with disease progression > 8 weeks following the last dose of platinum

Cohort 2) Subjects who have received > 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease and who have had no prior platinum therapy for metastatic disease

Intervention: Drug: talazoparib
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Active, not recruiting
84
December 2017
September 2016   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed carcinoma of the breast
  • Locally advanced and/or metastatic disease
  • Deleterious or pathogenic germline BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutation
  • Prior chemotherapy: Cohort 1) PR or CR to prior platinum-containing regimen for metastatic disease with disease progression > 8 weeks following the last dose of platinum; or Cohort 2) > 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease and no prior platinum for metastatic disease
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 1
  • Have adequate organ function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior enrollment into a clinical trial of a PARP inhibitor
  • CNS metastasis except adequately treated brain metastasis documented by baseline CT or MRI scan that has not progressed since previous scans and that does not require corticosteroids for management of CNS symptoms
  • Prior malignancy except for prior BRCA-associated cancer as long as there is no current evidence of the prior cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or non-melanoma skin cancer, and a cancer diagnosed and definitively treated >5 years prior to study enrollment with no subsequent evidence of recurrence
  • Known to be HIV positive, active hepatitis C virus, or active hepatitis B virus
  • Known hypersensitivity to any of the components of talazoparib
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
France,   Germany,   Spain,   United Kingdom,   United States
 
 
NCT02034916
673-201
2013-003076-12 ( EudraCT Number )
C3441008 ( Other Identifier: Alias Study Number )
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Pfizer
Pfizer
  • Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.
  • Medivation, Inc.
Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center Pfizer
Pfizer
October 2017

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP