We updated the design of this site on December 18, 2017. Learn more.
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

TReatment by Insulin Continuous Infusion in Type 2 DIAbetes (TRICIDIA2)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01889914
Recruitment Status : Unknown
Verified June 2013 by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon.
Recruitment status was:  Recruiting
First Posted : July 1, 2013
Last Update Posted : July 1, 2013
Information provided by (Responsible Party):

June 6, 2013
July 1, 2013
July 1, 2013
January 2012
March 2015   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
changes from baseline in insulinoresistance measured by biological tests of hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp in the two groups of treatment 6 months after the start of the treatment. [ Time Frame: baseline and six months after the begining of the study ]
Same as current
No Changes Posted
  • change from baseline in the hyperglycemia time spent during basal and prandial period with continuous glucose monitoring tool at 6 months [ Time Frame: baseline and six months after the beginning of the study ]
  • change from baseline in HbA1c in the two groups of treatment at three, six, nine and twelve months [ Time Frame: baseline and three, six, nine, twelve months ]
  • change from baseline in quality of life measured with questionnaires at 6 months [ Time Frame: baseline and 6 months ]
  • change from baseline in weight at three, six, nine and twelve months in the two groups. [ Time Frame: baseline and three, six, nine and twelve months ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
TReatment by Insulin Continuous Infusion in Type 2 DIAbetes
Treatment by Subcutaneous Continuous Infusion of Insulin by Portable Pump Versus Discontinuous Infusion of Insulin by Multi-injections in the Type 2 Diabetes: Study of the Insulinosensibility in the 2 Types of Treatments

The aim of the TRICIDIA2 study is to compare two modalities of administration of insulin.

In our future study, the investigators wish to study if the treatment by continuous infusion of insulin improves the insulinosensitivity of type 2 diabetic patients; the investigators indeed expect that the insulin delivered in a continuous way decreases the insulino-resistance of these patients compared with the intermittent delivering of insulin.

We wish to use before and after treatment the classic tools of measure of insulinosensitivity / the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp associated with a measure of the insulinosecretion thanks to a test of load in glucose IV. The coupling in the same procedure of these 2 tests is the Botnia clamp. We also wish to use the continuous measure of subcutaneous glucose during several days to estimate the reduction in the average glycemia on the fast and prandial periods as well as the decrease of the time spent in hyperglycemia during the day. This tool demonstrated its interest in type 2 diabetic population in several studies. Finally the current / spectro-IRM methods of imaging are now validated to quantify and measure exactly the importance of the steatosis, including in type 2 patients, because we know that it is probably the result of the insulino-resistance; We would also like to demonstrate that some genetic polymorphisms of proteins (polymorphisms G / T493 of the MTP, 1927 C/T of the receiver R1 of the adiponectin and 265 C/T of the gene of Apolipoprotéines A) are factors which can modulate the steatosis development in case of type 2 diabetes.

In other secondary criteria we wait for an improvement of HbA1c, quality of life of type 2 obese people with regard to the treatment by intensified Multi-injections.

Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Drug: 2 different procedures of administration of insulin
Compare the efficiency of both types of therapeutic care in insulinoresistant type 2 diabetic patients: insulin multi injections (levemir et Apidra versus continuous infusion of insulin apidra by pump
Other Names:
  • multiple daily discontinuous injections of insulin
  • continuous infusion of rapid insulin by an external pump
  • Experimental: continuous infusion of insulin by pump

    in this arm called "continuous infusion of insulin with a pump" the patient receive continuous rapid insulin (APIDRA ®)with an external pump.

    An hepatic IRM and a botnia test will be practice before and six months after the beginning of this treatment(continuous insulin)

    Intervention: Drug: 2 different procedures of administration of insulin
  • Experimental: discontinuous insulin multiple injections

    An arm called " intensification of the multiple daily injections ": the patient will receive an additional injection of basal insulin LEVEMIR® : five injections per day (2 injections of Levemir® and 3 injections of Apidra®) instead of four previously (1 injection of Levemir® and 3 injections of Apidra®).

    An hepatic IRM and a botnia test will be practice before and six months after the beginning of the treatment

    Intervention: Drug: 2 different procedures of administration of insulin
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
Unknown status
September 2015
March 2015   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 18 years old
  • type 2 diabete patient with insuline basal/bolus treatment for at least 6 months
  • Doses of insuline > 0,7 U/Kg/j
  • HbA1c ≥ 7,5%
  • without ADO for at least 4 weeks (sulfamides, Incrétines, glinides, acarbose) except the metformine
  • BMI ≥ 28,5 kg/m²
  • clinical diagnostique of diabetes for at least 10 ans
  • Patient must be able to Realize an automonitoring and to manage the functioning of an insulin pump.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • glitazone treatment less than 3 month before inclusion
  • Patient with an untreated by the laser proliferative ischemic retinopathy
  • BMI < 28,5 kg/m²
  • Pacemaker (CI IRM)
  • Presence of implantable material (CI IRM)
  • Pregnancy, breast-feeding
  • Practices of violent sports
  • Professional extreme environment of cold or heat
  • Serious psychiatric diseases physical and/or psychiatric Incapacitated medically significant
  • Poor sanitation
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Not Provided
Not Provided
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Sabine RUDONI, MD CHU de BOCAGE, DIJON, FRANCE
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
June 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP