Occupational Performance Coaching for Stroke Survivors
|First Received Date ICMJE||February 22, 2013|
|Last Updated Date||April 20, 2015|
|Start Date ICMJE||February 2013|
|Primary Completion Date||February 2015 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||Change in Reintegration to Normal Living Index score [ Time Frame: Baseline, average of 14 weeks, and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Measurement of change in level of participation from baseline to immediately post-intervention(average of 14 weeks) and to 6 months.
|Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||Change in Reintegration to Normal Living Index score [ Time Frame: Baseline, average of 12 weeks, and 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Measurement of change in level of participation from baseline to immediately post-intervetion(average of 12 weeks) and to 6 months.
|Change History||Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01800461 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site|
|Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE
|Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE
|Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE
||Participant experience of intervention [ Time Frame: Average of 14 weeks for intervention group only ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]|
|Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE
||Participatn experience of intervention [ Time Frame: Average of 12 weeks for intervention group only ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]|
|Brief Title ICMJE||Occupational Performance Coaching for Stroke Survivors|
|Official Title ICMJE||Occupational Performance Coaching for Stroke Survivors: A Novel Patient-centered Intervention to Improve Participation in Personally Valued Activities|
Participation in valued activities following stroke is a recognized problem. Efficient and effective interventions to address this problem have not yet been established although the literature provides direction as to the needs of stroke survivors and important parts of interventions to address these needs. Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) is an emerging approach to enabling occupational performance or participation in valued activities that includes these important parts of interventions. The primary goal of OPC is ability and satisfaction with participation in chosen activities, while promoting a client's ability to address future problems with participation. OPC has been successfully used with parents and their children in addressing problems with participation.
OPC has not been explored among adults who have experienced a stroke. For this study OPC-Stroke (OPC adapted for stroke survivors) will be tested to explore its potential effectiveness for increasing participation as well as how feasible and acceptable the research methods are. Sixteen participants who receive OPC-Stroke will be compared with sixteen who do not using measures of participation, goal achievement, well-being, self-efficacy and cognition. Those who receive OPC-Stroke will also be interviewed about their experience of the treatment.
Introduction Approximately 300,000 Canadians live with the effects of stroke. Following hospital discharge, stroke survivors attempt to return to participation in valued activities but this can be quite challenging. In fact, the majority of stroke survivors, across all disability levels, report problems occupying their time in meaningful ways.
Current interventions to enhance participation in valued activities have been limited and studies of these have had mixed results. This may be due to lack on consideration of important factors. As well, it is possible that success has been limited because there is not yet an efficient way to provide the kind of long term, individualized support that is required for successful return to valued activities. Effective and efficient interventions must be designed to build competence and provide stroke survivors with the skills and the tools they need to allow them to plan and manage their own return to personally valued activities over several months of recovery.
Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) is a new approach in occupational therapy whereby individuals are guided to solve problems critical to the achievement of self-identified goals related to participation. OPC draws on concepts from personal coaching, solution-focused therapy, problem solving interventions and emotional support. A positive, strengths-based approach is used to promote patient self-efficacy and self-management. This individualized approach provides a time-limited intervention to address current participation goals, while allowing individuals to develop the skills to address future participation goals. OPC has been tested with families of children who face challenges participating in age appropriate activities but has not been tested with adults who have experienced stroke. Following review of the literature, an adaptation of OPC for stroke survivors (OPC-Stroke) was developed that emphasizes individualized education and metacognitive strategies during both goal setting and problem solving, and broadens how support is considered beyond the family.
The purpose of this research is to explore the effectiveness of OPC-Stroke with adults who have experienced stroke and to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the research methods in preparation for a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT). This objective will be attained through answering the following questions:
Design This study will use a concurrent mixed method design of a pilot RCT with an embedded qualitative study. The qualitative component of this study will be a descriptive qualitative study with the goal of exploring the experience of participants who receive OPC-Stroke and providing insight into the components and processes of OPC-Stroke that promote goal achievement.
Study Population Thirty-two stroke survivors being discharged home from the acute stroke unit at The Ottawa Hospital or the Bruyère in-patient stroke rehabilitation unit will be recruited to the study.
Participants will be recruited at the time of discharge from hospital. The occupational therapists at the hospitals will screen potential participants and refer potentially interested patients to the Research Assistant who will seek informed consent.
Randomization Following consent to participate in the research study and completion of the initial outcome measures, participants will be allocated to the treatment or control group using block randomization (block size of 4). The randomization and allocation process will be completed by the statistician on contract with Bruyère Research Institute to ensure that randomization is adequate and group allocation cannot be tampered with.
The OPC-Stroke intervention consists of 10 face to face visits with an occupational therapist trained in OPC over a 16 week period. Visits will last approximately one hour.
Since the one of the secondary outcomes is changes in performance and satisfaction with individually-identified participation goals, all participants will receive the first visit prior to randomization. During this visit the coach will use the Personal Project Analysis tool combined with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) to facilitate discussion of and reflection on current participation in activities/projects. Three personal projects will be identified by each participant as intervention goals, and OPC-Stroke sessions will be focused on these projects. Finally, during this first session each participants will score their current performance and satisfaction in these projects using the COPM; as well as goal self-efficacy for each goal
Intervention participants will proceed directly to receive the OPC-Stroke intervention. As noted in the introduction, OPC-Stroke is a process of goal-focussed problem solving and collaborative performance analysis examining the interaction between the person, the environment and the task demands of the project/goal. Throughout the process, the coach will provide emotional support and promote exchange of information. During the final intervention visit, goal progress and the problem solving process will be reviewed.
Control Group The purpose of the control group in this study is to enhance internal validity including controlling for change that may occur with the passage of time. This is particularly relevant following stroke as the course of natural recovery and adjustment may lead to changes in participation. Therefore a usual care option for the control group was selected. Usual care is may consist of limited outpatient therapy (excluding occupational therapy) and/or personal support services for activities of daily living.
|Study Type ICMJE||Interventional|
|Study Phase||Not Provided|
|Study Design ICMJE||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Study Arm (s)||
|Publications *||Kessler DE, Egan MY, Dubouloz CJ, Graham FP, McEwen SE. Occupational performance coaching for stroke survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial protocol. Can J Occup Ther. 2014 Dec;81(5):279-88.|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
|Recruitment Status ICMJE||Active, not recruiting|
|Estimated Enrollment ICMJE||32|
|Estimated Completion Date||September 2015|
|Primary Completion Date||February 2015 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Eligibility Criteria ICMJE||
|Ages||18 Years and older|
|Accepts Healthy Volunteers||No|
|Contacts ICMJE||Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects|
|Listed Location Countries ICMJE||Canada|
|Removed Location Countries|
|NCT Number ICMJE||NCT01800461|
|Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE||20120844-01H|
|Has Data Monitoring Committee||No|
|Responsible Party||Dorothy Kessler, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute|
|Study Sponsor ICMJE||Ottawa Hospital Research Institute|
|Collaborators ICMJE||University of Ottawa|
|Information Provided By||Ottawa Hospital Research Institute|
|Verification Date||April 2015|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP