Goal Achievement After Utilizing an Anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin Intolerant Subjects -2 (GAUSS-2)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Amgen
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01763905
First received: January 7, 2013
Last updated: November 18, 2015
Last verified: November 2015

January 7, 2013
November 18, 2015
January 2013
November 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Mean percent change from baseline in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol [ Time Frame: 10 and 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Mean percent change from baseline in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol
  • Percent change from baseline in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol [ Time Frame: 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Percent change from baseline in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01763905 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Change From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Participants With Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) [ Time Frame: Weeks 10 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of Participants With LDL-C < 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in the Total Cholesterol/High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A1 Ratio at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A1 Ratio at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percent Change From Baseline in Very Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Mean change from baseline in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol [ Time Frame: 10 and 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Mean change from baseline in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol
  • Change from baseline in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol [ Time Frame: 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Change from baseline in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol
  • Mean Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol response (LDL-C < 70 mg/dL [1.8 mmol/L]) [ Time Frame: 10 and 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Mean Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol response (LDL-C < 70 mg/dL [1.8 mmol/L])
  • Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol response (LDL-C < 70 mg/dL [1.8 mmol/L]) [ Time Frame: 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol response (LDL-C < 70 mg/dL [1.8 mmol/L])
  • Mean percent change from baseline in non-high density lipoprotein-cholesterol [ Time Frame: 10 and 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Mean percent change from baseline in non-high density lipoprotein-cholesterol
  • Percent change from baseline in non-high density lipoprotein-cholesterol [ Time Frame: 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Percent change from baseline in non-high density lipoprotein-cholesterol
  • Mean percent change from baseline in apolipoprotein B [ Time Frame: 10 and 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Mean percent change from baseline in apolipoprotein B
  • Percent change from baseline in apolipoprotein B [ Time Frame: 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Percent change from baseline in apolipoprotein B
  • Mean percent change from baseline in the total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio [ Time Frame: 10 and 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Mean percent change from baseline in the total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio
  • Percent change from baseline in the total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio [ Time Frame: 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Percent change from baseline in the total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio
  • Mean percent change from baseline in apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 ratio [ Time Frame: 10 and 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Mean percent change from baseline in apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 ratio
  • Percent change from baseline in apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 ratio [ Time Frame: 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Percent change from baseline in apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 ratio
  • Mean percent change from baseline in lipoprotein (a) [ Time Frame: 10 and 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Mean percent change from baseline in lipoprotein (a)
  • Percent change from baseline in lipoprotein (a) [ Time Frame: 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Percent change from baseline in lipoprotein (a)
  • Mean percent change from baseline in triglycerides [ Time Frame: 10 and 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Mean percent change from baseline in triglycerides
  • Percent change from baseline in triglycerides [ Time Frame: 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Percent change from baseline in triglycerides
  • Mean percent change from baseline in high density lipoprotein-cholesterol [ Time Frame: 10 and 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Mean percent change from baseline in high density lipoprotein-cholesterol
  • Percent change from baseline in high density lipoprotein-cholesterol [ Time Frame: 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Percent change from baseline in high density lipoprotein-cholesterol
  • Mean percent change from baseline in very low density lipoprotein-cholesterol [ Time Frame: 10 and 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Mean percent change from baseline in very low density lipoprotein-cholesterol
  • Percent change from baseline in very low density lipoprotein-cholesterol [ Time Frame: 12 Weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Percent change from baseline in very low density lipoprotein-cholesterol
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Goal Achievement After Utilizing an Anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin Intolerant Subjects -2
A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of AMG 145, Compared With Ezetimibe, in Hypercholesterolemic Subjects Unable to Tolerate an Effective Dose of a HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor
The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of 12 weeks of subcutaneous (SC) evolocumab every 2 weeks (Q2W) and monthly (QM), compared with ezetimibe, on percent change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hypercholesterolemic adults unable to tolerate an effective dose of a statin (HMG-CoA (5-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A) reductase inhibitors).
Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Hyperlipidemia
  • Biological: Evolocumab
    Subcutaneous injection
    Other Names:
    • AMG 145
    • Repatha
  • Drug: Placebo to Evolocumab
    Subcutaneous injection
  • Drug: Ezetimibe
    Tablet for oral administration
    Other Name: Zetia
  • Drug: Placebo to Ezetimibe
    Tablet for oral administration
  • Active Comparator: Ezetimibe (Q2W)
    Participants received placebo subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks and 10 mg ezetimibe orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Placebo to Evolocumab
    • Drug: Ezetimibe
  • Active Comparator: Ezetimibe (QM)
    Participants received placebo subcutaneous injection once a month and 10 mg ezetimibe orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Placebo to Evolocumab
    • Drug: Ezetimibe
  • Experimental: Evolocumab Q2W
    Participants received 140 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks and placebo tablets once a day for up to 12 weeks.
    Interventions:
    • Biological: Evolocumab
    • Drug: Placebo to Ezetimibe
  • Experimental: Evolocumab QM
    Participants received 420 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once a month and placebo tablets once a day for up to 12 weeks.
    Interventions:
    • Biological: Evolocumab
    • Drug: Placebo to Ezetimibe

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
307
November 2013
November 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female ≥ 18 to ≤ 80 years of age
  • Not on a statin or on a low dose statin with stable dose for at least 4 weeks
  • History of intolerance to at least 2 statins
  • Subject not at LDL-C goal
  • Lipid lowering therapy has been stable prior to enrolment for at least 4 weeks.
  • Fasting triglycerides ≤ 400 mg/dL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or IV heart failure
  • Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Type 1 diabetes, poorly controlled type 2 diabetes
  • Uncontrolled hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism
Both
18 Years to 80 Years
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States,   Australia,   Belgium,   Canada,   Denmark,   France,   Germany,   Hong Kong,   Netherlands,   Poland,   South Africa,   Spain,   Switzerland,   United Kingdom
 
NCT01763905
20110116, 2012-001364-30
Yes
Not Provided
Not Provided
Amgen
Amgen
Not Provided
Study Director: MD Amgen
Amgen
November 2015

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP