We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

The Effects of Pork vs. Chicken/Fish in a DASH Diet on Blood Pressure Regulation in Middle Aged and Older Adults (S31)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01696097
First Posted: September 28, 2012
Last Update Posted: August 17, 2015
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Wayne Campbell, Purdue University
September 26, 2012
September 28, 2012
August 17, 2015
April 2012
February 2014   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Change in blood pressure [ Time Frame: After 6 weeks of following DASH diet ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01696097 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Change in blood lipids [ Time Frame: After 6 weeks of following DASH diet ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
The Effects of Pork vs. Chicken/Fish in a DASH Diet on Blood Pressure Regulation in Middle Aged and Older Adults
The Effects of Pork vs. Chicken/Fish in a DASH Diet on Blood Pressure Regulation in Middle Aged and Older Adults (S31)
The purpose of this study is to determine if the source of dietary protein (pork or chicken/fish) as a part of the DASH diet affects blood pressure control in adults with high blood pressure.
High blood pressure is a major risk factor for heart disease and stroke and affects 50 million people in the United States. Making healthy food choices, such as those in the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) Diet, has been shown to improve blood pressure control in people with high blood pressure. The purpose of this study is to determine if the source of dietary protein (pork or chicken/fish) as a part of the DASH diet affects blood pressure control in adults with high blood pressure.
Interventional
Not Provided
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Hypertension
  • Dyslipidemias
Behavioral: DASH diet counseling
Comparison of protein source (chicken and fish vs. pork) as part of DASH diet on blood pressure regulation and blood lipids.
Dietary Counseling
Pork vs. Chicken/Fish in a DASH Diet on Blood Pressure
Intervention: Behavioral: DASH diet counseling
Sayer RD, Wright AJ, Chen N, Campbell WW. Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet retains effectiveness to reduce blood pressure when lean pork is substituted for chicken and fish as the predominant source of protein. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Aug;102(2):302-8. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.111757. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
19
October 2014
February 2014   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male or female
  • age 40-75
  • BMI 25-40 kg/m2
  • systolic blood pressure 120-160 mm Hg
  • diastolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg
  • non-diabetic, no acute illness
  • not following vigorous exercise program
  • urinary continence

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age <40 or >75
  • BMI <25 or >40 kg/m2
  • systolic blood pressure <120 or >160 mm Hg
  • diastolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg
  • diabetic, acute illness
  • following vigorous exercise program
  • urinary incontinence
  • current smoker
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
40 Years to 75 Years   (Adult, Senior)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
 
NCT01696097
1112011665
S31 Campbell Lab ( Other Identifier: Purdue University )
No
Not Provided
Not Provided
Wayne Campbell, Purdue University
Purdue University
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Wayne W Campbell, Ph. D. Purdue University
Purdue University
August 2015

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP