Role of Neutrophil Activation in Anaphylaxis to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NASA)
![]() |
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01637220 |
Recruitment Status :
Completed
First Posted : July 11, 2012
Last Update Posted : December 12, 2017
|
Tracking Information | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
First Submitted Date | June 4, 2012 | |||
First Posted Date | July 11, 2012 | |||
Last Update Posted Date | December 12, 2017 | |||
Study Start Date | August 2012 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | July 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Current Primary Outcome Measures |
Percentage of circulating activated neutrophils in the group case compared to that of the group of control. [ Time Frame: 30min post-anaphylactic shock ] This measure will be based on the intensity of expression of the activation marker CD62L (L-selectin) by blood neutrophils using flow cytometry. Our preliminary data indicate that the Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of CD62L is >450 when considering " non-activated " neutrophils, and CD62L(MFI)<300 when considering " activated " neutrophils.
|
|||
Original Primary Outcome Measures | Same as current | |||
Change History | ||||
Current Secondary Outcome Measures |
|
|||
Original Secondary Outcome Measures |
|
|||
Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures | Not Provided | |||
Descriptive Information | ||||
Brief Title | Role of Neutrophil Activation in Anaphylaxis to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents | |||
Official Title | Role of Neutrophil Activation in Anaphylaxis to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents | |||
Brief Summary | In about 10% of preoperative anaphylactic reactions to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) (114 patients analyzed at the BICHAT Hospital), a classical mechanism (mast cell- and IgE-dependent) is not identified. The mechanisms underlying these atypical anaphylactic reactions are unknown. The investigators have developed at the Pasteur Institute a murine model of anaphylaxis in which neutrophils, IgG and Platelet Activating Factor (PAF) play predominant roles. In addition, preliminary results obtained at the BICHAT Hospital suggest the presence of specific IgG anti-quaternary ammonium in the sera of patients that had developed a shock to NMBA anesthesia, but not in controls exposed to NMBA anesthesia or in normal blood donors. Finally, the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), extracellular filaments made of DNA and histones, may contribute to respiratory symptoms HYPOTHESIS: Neutrophils are implicated in NMBA -induced anaphylactic reactions in humans. Activated by IgG-NMBA complexes, which aggregate IgG receptors, neutrophils release PAF and NETs that are implicated in the cardiac and respiratory distress during anaphylaxis. It is possible that the activation of neutrophils: 1) explains the clinical features of atypical anaphylactic reactions (non-IgE mediated), 2) participates also in part to classical anaphylactic reactions GENERAL OBJECTIVE: Compare the percentage of circulating activated neutrophils in a group of patients immediately following a NMBA -induced shock (case) to that of a group of patients exposed to NMBA during anesthesia without developing a shock (control). SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: A) the day of the shock, quantify and compare between case and controls, 1) the level of circulating anti-quaternary ammonium IgG by immuno fluorometry, 2) the expression of IgG receptors (FcR) on the surface of neutrophils by cytometry, 3) the levels of circulating PAF by mass spectrometry, 4) the amount of NETs by immunofluorescence. B) 6 to 10 weeks after the shock perform, 1) cutaneous tests to NMBA, 2) a study of the capacity of stimulation of ex vivo neutrophils by IgG- NMBA complexes |
|||
Detailed Description | Case control study, with a 6,10 week follow-up on cases Selection of cases : Inclusion criteria: Any patient of age 18 and over: Presenting with clinical signs compatible with a perioperative anaphylactic reaction to neuromuscular blocking drugs, whatever the grade of the anaphylactic reaction That was treated following the French Patient Management 2011 guidelines (cf. annex 5) Non inclusion criteria: patient dying during the anaphylactic shock Selection of controls: One control for each case will be included. Controls will be recruited solely at the Hospital BICHAT. Controls should correspond to the following: Inclusion criteria: Any patient of age 18 and over Hospitalized for a surgical intervention necessitating a neuromuscular blocking drug injection, without developing an anaphylactic reaction That had been informed of the particulars of the study and that had consented to participate in this study Non inclusion criteria: pregnant women NB: If a patient recruited as a control suffers from an anaphylactic reaction following neuromuscular blocking drug-injection, this patient will be considered a case, and other controls paired, one to this novel case and one to the original case patient. Pairing : Controls will be paired to cases based on the following criteria : - age :+/- 5 years
Duration of the study:Total duration: 26 months Inclusion period: 24 months Length of participation for a patient: Cases: 6 to 10 weeks Controls: the day of the surgery Sample collection Cases: at the time of the shock (blood and plasma sample, and, when necessary for the patient, bronchial aspiration liquid) and during the Allergology Anesthesia consult 6 to 10 weeks post anaphylactic reaction Controls: blood and plasma sample following the injection of neuromuscular blocking drug injection. All blood sampling (and eventually aspiration of bronchial fluids) required for this study are performed during the normal clinical management of case and of control patients, without any additional or non-conventional procedure of intervention, diagnosis or patient monitoring (non-interventional study). Supernumerary blood tubes are collected in addition to those collected during the normal clinical practice (10 ml on dry tube for serum/plasma and 10 ml on EDTA tube) at the same time (case and controls) and the bronchial aspiration fluid is kept for analysis instead of being discarded. An anaphylactic shock to neuromuscular blocking drug during anesthesia arises in minutes following injection/perfusion. Samples from case patients will therefore be collected in the 30 to 60 minutes following injection/perfusion of the neuromuscular blocking drug, as it is already currently performed during surgery, and when the patient's condition has been stabilized. The investigators expect that surgical incisions will not be performed in most, if not all, case patients as the anaphylactic reactions occur before incisions are possible, i.e. just after injection/perfusion of the neuromuscular blocking drug. Samples from control patients will therefore be collected shortly after exposure to neuromuscular blocking drug and before surgical incisions are performed, to avoid the perturbations induced by this surgical act, especially regarding neutrophil activation Blood volume collected specifically for this study:
Samples collected on dry tubes (serum sample) will be housed in the sero-tec of Hospital BICHAT, and series of aliquots sent to Institute Pasteur upon request. Identical aliquots will be used to dose anti quaternary ammonium specific IgG, and specific IgE as currently performed at the Unity d'Immunologic Autoimmunity et Hypersensibility at Hospital BICHAT. When performed, bronchial aspiration fluids will be kept in part for the study of NETs in the Unity d'Immunologic Autoimmunity et Hypersensibility at Hospital BICHAT, and in part for analysis of cellular content and PAF levels at the Institute Pasteur, and accordingly delivered the same day in the respective laboratories. Cutaneous prick tests will be performed during the Allergology-Anesthesia consult 6 to 10 weeks post-anaphylactic reaction. Following each inclusion, each hospital will send, as it is current medical practice, information on the patient: age, sex, type of surgery that was planned, nature of anesthetics used, history of atopic events including asthma, allergy to food or drugs, comorbidity factors. Control patients will be included at Hospital BICHAT only. Main judgment criteria:
Secondary judgment criteria:
|
|||
Study Type | Observational | |||
Study Design | Observational Model: Case-Control Time Perspective: Prospective |
|||
Target Follow-Up Duration | Not Provided | |||
Biospecimen | Not Provided | |||
Sampling Method | Non-Probability Sample | |||
Study Population | Selection of cases :
Selection of controls:
|
|||
Condition | Anaphylactic Shock to Neuro-Muscular Blocking Agents (NMBA) | |||
Intervention | Biological: Blood volume collected specifically for this study
|
|||
Study Groups/Cohorts | case, control
Blood volume collected specifically for this study
Intervention: Biological: Blood volume collected specifically for this study
|
|||
Publications * | Gouel-Chéron A, de Chaisemartin L, Jönsson F, Nicaise-Roland P, Granger V, Sabahov A, Guinnepain MT, Chollet-Martin S, Bruhns P, Neukirch C, Longrois D; NASA study group. Low end-tidal CO2 as a real-time severity marker of intra-anaesthetic acute hypersensitivity reactions. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Nov 1;119(5):908-917. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex260. | |||
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline. |
||||
Recruitment Information | ||||
Recruitment Status | Completed | |||
Actual Enrollment |
200 | |||
Original Estimated Enrollment | Same as current | |||
Actual Study Completion Date | December 2015 | |||
Actual Primary Completion Date | July 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) | |||
Eligibility Criteria | Selection of cases : INCLUSION CRITERIA:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: - pregnant women Selection of controls: INCLUSION CRITERIA :
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: none |
|||
Sex/Gender |
|
|||
Ages | 18 Years and older (Adult, Older Adult) | |||
Accepts Healthy Volunteers | No | |||
Contacts | Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects | |||
Listed Location Countries | France | |||
Removed Location Countries | ||||
Administrative Information | ||||
NCT Number | NCT01637220 | |||
Other Study ID Numbers | P110909 2012-A00242-41 ( Other Identifier: ID CRB ) |
|||
Has Data Monitoring Committee | No | |||
U.S. FDA-regulated Product | Not Provided | |||
IPD Sharing Statement | Not Provided | |||
Responsible Party | Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris | |||
Study Sponsor | Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris | |||
Collaborators | Not Provided | |||
Investigators |
|
|||
PRS Account | Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris | |||
Verification Date | December 2017 |