Real Talk Brief Intervention Study

This study is currently recruiting participants. (see Contacts and Locations)
Verified July 2015 by Boston University
U.S. Department of Justice
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Boston University Identifier:
First received: June 28, 2012
Last updated: July 23, 2015
Last verified: July 2015

June 28, 2012
July 23, 2015
March 2014
February 2017   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Dating abuse perpetration [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Self-reported perpetration of dating abuse, including acts such as pushing, hitting, kicking and forcing partner to have sex.
Dating abuse-related knowledge [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Knowledge about which dating behaviors are considered abusive and unhealthy
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01632176 on Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Real Talk Brief Intervention Study
Real Talk Brief Intervention Study

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) study is a small scale test of the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a brief motivational interview-style intervention. The intervention will take place in the pediatric and adult emergency departments by a trained interventionist and will follow an intervention algorithm developed by a team of dating abuse and brief intervention experts. The research design is as follows: the investigators will randomize youth ages 15-19 to one of two groups: one group who receives the intervention (N=~180), and the other which does not (N=~180). The investigators will compare changes in outcomes from baseline to 6-month follow-up for those in both groups. The investigators will be looking at outcomes including dating abuse-related knowledge, attitudes about the use of violence to resolve conflict, and dating abuse behavior (perpetration and/or victimization).

Statement of study hypothesis: Youth who receive the intervention will show improvements in dating abuse-related knowledge, attitudes and behavior that are maintained for 6 months, while those in the comparison group will show no similar change.

Not Provided
Phase 1
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Subject)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Dating Violence
  • Dating Abuse
Behavioral: Real Talk Intervention
This is a one session brief motivational interview-style intervention that follows a 9-step intervention algorithm. The intervention is delivered by a trained motivational interview interventionist. There are 3 booster calls up to six weeks following the intervention.
  • No Intervention: Control
    Patients in the control group will not receive any intervention, but will receive standard care for dating abuse issues.
  • Experimental: Intervention
    Patients in the intervention group will participate in the intervention.
    Intervention: Behavioral: Real Talk Intervention
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
February 2017
February 2017   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 15-19 years old
  • English-speaking
  • Have used at least one form of physical or sexual aggression against a dating or sexual partner in the past three months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's reason for ED visit is an acute mental health problem (e.g., suicidal ideation or attempt, severe anxiety attack)
  • Patient is a prisoner
  • Patient is determined to be potentially lethal
  • Patient attends batterer intervention classes
15 Years to 19 Years
United States
Boston University
Boston University
U.S. Department of Justice
Not Provided
Boston University
July 2015

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP