Comment Period Extended to 3/23/2015 for Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for FDAAA 801 and NIH Draft Reporting Policy for NIH-Funded Trials

Reamed Locked Plating - Metaphyseal Fractures of the Distal Femur and Tibia

This study has been terminated.
(Low enrollment.)
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Florida Orthopaedic Institute Identifier:
First received: March 8, 2012
Last updated: November 10, 2014
Last verified: November 2014

March 8, 2012
November 10, 2014
May 2010
August 2014   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Time to union [ Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months and 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
This will be evaluated with the reading of xrays
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01553630 on Archive Site
Reoperation rate [ Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
The rate of re operation will be evaluated
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
Reamed Locked Plating - Metaphyseal Fractures of the Distal Femur and Tibia
Reamed Locked Plating - Metaphyseal Fractures of the Distal Femur and Tibia

Comminuted metaphyseal fractures (OTA classification A2/3 and C2/3) of the distal femur and distal tibia are difficult to treat and typically have more complications than other metaphyseal fractures. Delayed union, nonunion and need for secondary bone graft procedures are frequent outcomes. These A2/3 and C2/3 fractures of the distal femur and distal tibia treated with locked plates often have a critical sized fracture gap (poorly organized cortical pieces many of which are stripped of soft tissue). Optimal management strategies that minimize both fracture healing time and complication rates remain controversial. Primary bone grafts or early secondary bone grafts have been recommended for these comminuted open fractures, but have not been studied as the primary end point in a randomized trial. There is a need to study primary bone grafting during open reduction and internal fixation (plating) of these difficult fractures, to determine if shorter healing time, and thus less need for reoperation, can be achieved.

Hypothesis Acute autogenous bone grafting at the time of fixation will hasten clinical and radiographic union with a lower need for secondary procedures

Study procedures:

Eligible fractures will be identified, consented and randomized to RIA augmentation or non graft treatment. Bone graft will be harvested through the fracture at the time of the definitive fixation procedure. No additional graft can be utilized acutely (No iliac crest bone graft, or INFUSE, OP-1, Callos, etc).

Randomization Procedures: We will be using Research Randomizer to calculate a random assignment design for Group A and Group B, which will be kept by the Research Coordinator. Once a patient agrees to participate in the study and signs an Informed Consent Form, the treating surgeon will request the treatment assignment from the Research Coordinator prior to the surgery. Group A will receive RIA augmentation. Group B will receive non-graft treatment. Patient outcomes will be analyzed using intention to treat principles.

Surgical Procedures: Locked lateral plating of comminuted supracondylar femur and distal tibia fractures is an accepted standard of care. In severely comminuted fracture patterns, restoration of length and alignment often leaves substantial fracture gap increasing the risk of fracture nonunion. Historically, this has been accepted with the plan to return to the patient to surgery for bone grafting at a later date if the nonunion is developing. Intra-focal reaming with irrigation & aspiration (RIA) at time of initial surgery allows for acute autogenous bone grafting with no increased morbidity to the patient.

Surgery for Group A receiving bone graft follows the same course as without acute grafting (same incision, dissection etc.) with the exception that after initial exposure, a guide wire is placed into the proximal femoral canal (retrograde) through the fracture, and graft is harvested using the RIA system. The RIA system has a reservoir to collect the reamings as they are aspirated from the fracture site. Reduction and fixation with locked plates then proceed as usual and the harvested graft is then placed into the residual gap with the expectation that nonunion rates may be decreased. A theoretical advantage is the renewed fracture hematoma that will collect at the fracture site secondary to reaming the canal which may also increase union rates and time to union. No increased morbidity is incurred and the increased surgical time is under 10 minutes.

Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
  • Femoral Fractures
  • Tibial Fractures
  • Procedure: RIA bone graft
    Acute autogenous bone grafting with RIA graft at the time of surgical fixation.
  • Procedure: Surgery without bone graft
    Plating of fracture without bone graft
  • Active Comparator: RIA bone graft
    Surgery: open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of high energy metaphyseal fractures with Reamed Irrigator Aspirator (RIA) bone graft at the time of fixation.
    Intervention: Procedure: RIA bone graft
  • Active Comparator: Surgery without bone graft
    Surgery:open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of high energy metaphyseal fractures without Reamed Irrigator Aspirator (RIA) bone graft at the time of fixation.
    Intervention: Procedure: Surgery without bone graft
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
August 2014
August 2014   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • High energy metaphyseal fracture (distal femur or tibia) indicated for plate fixation (open or closed)
  • Adult, acute fractures only

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to ream fractured bone
  • Subject is unable, unwilling or unlikely to follow up
  • Subject is under age 18 years
  • Prisoners
18 Years to 90 Years
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
Reamed Locked Plating
Florida Orthopaedic Institute
Florida Orthopaedic Institute
Not Provided
Not Provided
Florida Orthopaedic Institute
November 2014

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP