We updated the design of this site on September 25th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Placement of Perineural Catheters in the Popliteal Region

The recruitment status of this study is unknown. The completion date has passed and the status has not been verified in more than two years.
Verified November 2012 by Sidiropoulou Tatiana, Attikon Hospital.
Recruitment status was:  Recruiting
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01546077
First Posted: March 7, 2012
Last Update Posted: November 12, 2012
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Sidiropoulou Tatiana, Attikon Hospital
February 3, 2012
March 7, 2012
November 12, 2012
January 2012
March 2013   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
consumption of local anesthetics [ Time Frame: 36 hours PO ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01546077 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
pain scores [ Time Frame: 36 hours postoperatively ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Placement of Perineural Catheters in the Popliteal Region
Comparison of Techniques for Placement of Perineural Catheters in the Popliteal Region
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of the hydrolocalization technique for placement of popliteal perineural catheters in comparison with the stimulating catheters. A non inferiority trial.
Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Foot Surgery
Procedure: Placement of perineural catheters with Hydrolocalization technique using
Placement of perineural catheters in the popliteal region comparing two techniques. while the drugs used are the same (ropivacaine 0.6% for initial bolus and 0.2% for continuous technique) we will compare dosage required in each group
  • Active Comparator: Hydrolocalization technique group
    Technique of placement of popliteal perineural catheter using the hydrolocalization technique with ultrasound
    Intervention: Procedure: Placement of perineural catheters with Hydrolocalization technique using
  • Active Comparator: Stimulating Catheter technique group
    A technique for placement of popliteal catheter with the aid of a neurostimulator
    Intervention: Procedure: Placement of perineural catheters with Hydrolocalization technique using
Saranteas T, Adoni A, Sidiropoulou T, Paraskeuopoulos T, Kostopanagiotou G. Combined ultrasound imaging and hydrolocalization technique for accurate placement of perineural catheters. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Dec;107(6):1008-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer375.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Unknown status
40
Not Provided
March 2013   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults
  • BMI less than 30

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known allergies to local anesthetics or other drugs used
  • patient refusal
  • any local or systemic contraindication to the use of popliteal block
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Greece,   Italy
 
 
NCT01546077
HLOCSTIM1
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Sidiropoulou Tatiana, Attikon Hospital
Attikon Hospital
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Tatiana F Sidiropoulou, MD, PhD Attikon Hospital
Principal Investigator: Theodosios Saranteas, MD, PhD Attikon Hospital
Study Chair: Georgia G Kostopanagiotou, MD, PhD Attikon Hospital
Attikon Hospital
November 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP