We updated the design of this site on September 25th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Randomized Study of Integration Success of Osseotite Dental Implants Placed Using Different Insertion Procedures (Pegasus)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01529736
First Posted: February 9, 2012
Last Update Posted: March 21, 2017
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Zimmer Biomet
February 7, 2012
February 9, 2012
March 21, 2017
December 2010
December 2016   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
primary stability countertorque measures [ Time Frame: 4 months ]
resistance to countertorque measures showing primary stability success of implants
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01529736 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
cumulative success rate [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
Crestal bone regression (amount of bone loss measured) and equivalence in integration success (implant mobility)
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Randomized Study of Integration Success of Osseotite Dental Implants Placed Using Different Insertion Procedures
Prospective Randomized-controlled Study of the Integration Success of Osseotite Implants Placed With Different Insertion Procedures
Osseotite implants placed with higher insertion torque (TEST procedure) will have higher initial stability and integration success than those placed with lower insertion torque forces.
Osseotite implants will be placed using the standard lower insertion torque forces and compared to implants placed using higher insertion torque forces.
Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Partial Edentulism
  • Tooth Disease
  • Procedure: High torque insertion
    Osseotite implant placed with high insertion torque forces
    Other Name: Osseotite endosseous dental implant
  • Procedure: Low torque insertion
    Osseotite implant placed with low insertion torque forces
    Other Name: Osseotite endosseous dental implant
  • Experimental: High torque insertion
    High torque insertion
    Intervention: Procedure: High torque insertion
  • Active Comparator: Low torque insertion
    Low torque insertion
    Intervention: Procedure: Low torque insertion
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
60
December 2016
December 2016   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients of either sex and older than 18 years of age
  • patients needing a minimum of 3 implants to treat partial edentulism
  • patients physically able to tolerate surgical and restorative dental procedures
  • patients agreeing to all protocol visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with infection or severe inflammation at the intended treatment sites
  • patients smoking greater than 10 cigarettes per day
  • patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • patients with uncontrolled metabolic diseases
  • patients who received radiation treatment to the head in the past 12 months
  • patients needing bone grafting at the intended treatment sites
  • patients known to be pregnant at screening visit
  • patients with para-functional habits like bruxing and clenching
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Colombia
 
 
NCT01529736
3004
No
Not Provided
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided
Zimmer Biomet
Zimmer Biomet
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Armando Estefan, DMD Universidad Javeriana
Zimmer Biomet
March 2017

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP