ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Study Looking at Longitudinal Changes in Fatigue and Health Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Treated With Subcutaneous Anti-TNF-α Therapy

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01521884
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : January 31, 2012
Results First Posted : February 19, 2015
Last Update Posted : February 19, 2015
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Pfizer

August 19, 2011
January 31, 2012
February 3, 2015
February 19, 2015
February 19, 2015
November 2010
February 2014   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale - Version 2 (AIMS2) Main Component Score at Baseline [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
    AIMS2 is a disease-specific measure of physical, social, and emotional well-being. It is a 78-item questionnaire assessing 12 scales: moving capacities, walking and dexterity, hand and fingers movements, arm movements, self-care, household activities, social activities, support of family and friends, joint pain, work, nervous tension and psychological condition (anxiety and depression). Each item was scored as 0 (or 1, best situation) to 4 (worst situation). Sub-total score of each of the 12 scales normalized to a maximum of 10. Total score were calculated for AIMS2 Affect ([Level of tension + Mood]/2), AIMS2 Physical ([Mobility level + Walking and bending + Hand and finger function + Arm function + Self Care + Household tasks]/6), and AIMS2 Symptom (Arthritis pain) with total score range from 0 to 10 for all component scores, where higher scores indicated worse situation.
  • Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale - Version 2 (AIMS2) Main Component Score at Month 6 [ Time Frame: Month 6 ]
    AIMS2 is a disease-specific measure of physical, social, and emotional well-being. It is a 78-item questionnaire assessing 12 scales: moving capacities, walking and dexterity, hand and fingers movements, arm movements, self-care, household activities, social activities, support of family and friends, joint pain, work, nervous tension and psychological condition (anxiety and depression). Each item was scored as 0 (or 1, best situation) to 4 (worst situation). Sub-total score of each of the 12 scales normalized to a maximum of 10. Total score were calculated for AIMS2 Affect ([Level of tension + Mood]/2), AIMS2 Physical ([Mobility level + Walking and bending + Hand and finger function + Arm function + Self Care + Household tasks]/6), and AIMS2 Symptom (Arthritis pain) with total score range from 0 to 10 for all component scores, where higher scores indicated worse situation.
  • Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale - Version 2 (AIMS2) Main Component Score at Month 12 [ Time Frame: Month 12 ]
    AIMS2 is a disease-specific measure of physical, social, and emotional well-being. It is a 78-item questionnaire assessing 12 scales: moving capacities, walking and dexterity, hand and fingers movements, arm movements, self-care, household activities, social activities, support of family and friends, joint pain, work, nervous tension and psychological condition (anxiety and depression). Each item was scored as 0 (or 1, best situation) to 4 (worst situation). Sub-total score of each of the 12 scales normalized to a maximum of 10. Total score were calculated for AIMS2 Affect ([Level of tension + Mood]/2), AIMS2 Physical ([Mobility level + Walking and bending + Hand and finger function + Arm function + Self Care + Household tasks]/6), and AIMS2 Symptom (Arthritis pain) with total score range from 0 to 10 for all component scores, where higher scores indicated worse situation.
  • Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale - Version 2 (AIMS2) Main Component Score at Month 18 [ Time Frame: Month 18 ]
    AIMS2 is a disease-specific measure of physical, social, and emotional well-being. It is a 78-item questionnaire assessing 12 scales: moving capacities, walking and dexterity, hand and fingers movements, arm movements, self-care, household activities, social activities, support of family and friends, joint pain, work, nervous tension and psychological condition (anxiety and depression). Each item was scored as 0 (or 1, best situation) to 4 (worst situation). Sub-total score of each of the 12 scales normalized to a maximum of 10. Total score were calculated for AIMS2 Affect ([Level of tension + Mood]/2), AIMS2 Physical ([Mobility level + Walking and bending + Hand and finger function + Arm function + Self Care + Household tasks]/6), and AIMS2 Symptom (Arthritis pain) with total score range from 0 to 10 for all component scores, where higher scores indicated worse situation.
  • Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale - Version 2 (AIMS2) Main Component Score at Month 24 [ Time Frame: Month 24 ]
    AIMS2 is a disease-specific measure of physical, social, and emotional well-being. It is a 78-item questionnaire assessing 12 scales: moving capacities, walking and dexterity, hand and fingers movements, arm movements, self-care, household activities, social activities, support of family and friends, joint pain, work, nervous tension and psychological condition (anxiety and depression). Each item was scored as 0 (or 1, best situation) to 4 (worst situation). Sub-total score of each of the 12 scales normalized to a maximum of 10. Total score were calculated for AIMS2 Affect ([Level of tension + Mood]/2), AIMS2 Physical ([Mobility level + Walking and bending + Hand and finger function + Arm function + Self Care + Household tasks]/6), and AIMS2 Symptom (Arthritis pain) with total score range from 0 to 10 for all component scores, where higher scores indicated worse situation.
Longitudinal changes in health status (AIMS2 components: Physical, Affect, Symptom, Social Interaction and Role), over two years of follow up, in a cohort of RA patients treated with SC anti-TNF-α therapy [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01521884 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Fatigue Score [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 ]
    Participants recorded their fatigue score on a range of 0 to 10, where higher score indicated higher intensity of fatigue.
  • Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS 28-ESR) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 ]
    DAS28-ESR was calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and tender joints (TJC ) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeter per hour [mm/hour]) and participant's assessment of disease activity visual analog scale (scores ranging 0 [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad]). Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity (DA). DAS28-ESR less than equal to (<=) 3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>) 3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high DA
  • Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS 28-CRP) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 ]
    DAS28-CRP was calculated from the number of swollen joints ( SJC) and tender joints (TJC) count using 28 joint count and CRP (milligram per liter [mg/L]). Total score range: 0-10, higher score= more disease activity. DAS28 (CRP) : <3.2= low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and less than (<)2.6 = remission.
  • Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Total Score [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 ]
    HAQ: 20-item participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom, arise, eat, walk, reach, grip, hygiene and common activities. Each item scored on 4-point scale, 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of item scores. HAQ total score was 0 to 60 (as used in Belgium), where greater score indicated greater difficulty.
  • Longitudinal changes in fatigue (VAS scale), over two years of follow up, in a cohort of RA patients treated with SC anti-TNF-α therapy [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
  • Longitudinal changes in health status (AIMS2 component Physical), over two years of follow up, in a cohort of RA patients treated with SC anti-TNF-α therapy [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
  • Relationship between the different components of AIMS2 and fatigue. [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
  • Relationship between the different components of AIMS2 and disease activity scores (DAS28) [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
  • Relationship between fatigue (VAS scale) and disease activity scores (DAS28) [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
  • Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale - Version 2 (AIMS2) Main Components and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Fatigue Score [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 ]
    Spearman correlation coefficient between AIMS2 component score and VAS fatigue score (AIMS2 component score versus [vs] VAS fatigue) was calculated. AIMS2 : 78-item questionnaire assessing 12 scales. Each item was scored as 0 (or 1, best situation) to 4 (worst situation). Sub-total score of each of the 12 scales normalized to a maximum of 10. Total score were calculated for AIMS2 Affect ([Level of tension + Mood]/2), AIMS2 Physical ([Mobility level + Walking and bending + Hand and finger function + Arm function + Self Care + Household tasks]/6), and AIMS2 Symptom (Arthritis pain); total score range from 0 to 10, higher scores indicates worse situation and VAS score: Participants recorded their fatigue score on a range of 0 to 10, where higher score indicated higher intensity of fatigue.
  • Pearson Correlation Coefficient Between Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale - Version 2 (AIMS2) Main Components and Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation (DAS 28-ESR) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6,1 2, 18, 24 ]
    Pearson correlation coefficient between AIMS2 component score and DAS28-ESR score (AIMS2 component score vs DAS28-ESR) was calculated. AIMS2: 78-item questionnaire assessing 12 scales. Each item was scored as 0 (or 1, best situation) to 4 (worst situation). Sub-total score of each of the 12 scales normalized to a maximum of 10. Total score were calculated for AIMS2 Affect ([Level of tension + Mood]/2), AIMS2 Physical ([Mobility level + Walking and bending + Hand and finger function + Arm function + Self Care + Household tasks]/6), and AIMS2 Symptom (Arthritis pain); total score range from 0 to 10, higher scores indicates worse situation and DAS28-ESR calculated from the number of SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and participant's assessment of disease activity VAS (scores ranging 0 [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad]). Total score range: 0-10, higher score= more disease activity. DAS28-ESR <= 3.2 = low DA, DAS28 > 3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high DA.
  • Pearson Correlation Coefficient Between Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale- Version 2 (AIMS2) Main Components and Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS 28-CRP) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 ]
    Pearson correlation coefficient between AIMS2 component score and DAS28-CRP score (AIMS2 component score vs DAS28-CRP) was calculated. AIMS2: 78-item questionnaire assessing 12 scales. Each item was scored as 0 (or 1, best situation) to 4 (worst situation). Sub-total score of each of the 12 scales normalized to a maximum of 10. Total score were calculated for AIMS2 Affect ([Level of tension + Mood]/2), AIMS2 Physical ([Mobility level + Walking and bending + Hand and finger function + Arm function + Self Care + Household tasks]/6), and AIMS2 Symptom (Arthritis pain); total score range from 0 to 10, higher scores indicates worse situation DAS28-CRP was calculated from the number of SJC and TJC count using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0-10, higher score= more disease activity. DAS28 (CRP): <3.2= low DA, >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high DA and <2.6 = remission.
  • Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation (DAS 28-ESR) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Fatigue Score [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 ]
    Spearman correlation coefficient between DAS28-ESR and VAS fatigue (DAS28-ESR vs VAS score) was calculated. DAS28-ESR calculated from the number of SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour) and participant's assessment of disease activity VAS (scores ranging 0 [very well] to 100 mm [extremely bad]). Total score range: 0-10, higher score= more disease activity. DAS28-ESR <= 3.2 = low DA, DAS28 > 3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high DA and VAS fatigue = Participants recorded their fatigue score on a range of 0 to 10, where higher score indicated higher intensity of fatigue.
  • Spearman Correlation Coefficient Between Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (DAS 28-CRP) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Fatigue Score [ Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6, 12, 18, 24 ]
    Spearman correlation coefficient between DAS28-CRP and VAS score (DAS28-CRP vs VAS score) was calculated. DAS28-CRP was calculated from the number of SJC and TJC count using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0-10, higher score= more disease activity. DAS28 (CRP): <3.2= low DA, >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high DA and <2.6 = remission and VAS= Participants recorded their fatigue score on a range of 0 to 10, where higher score indicated higher intensity of fatigue.
Not Provided
 
Study Looking at Longitudinal Changes in Fatigue and Health Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Treated With Subcutaneous Anti-TNF-α Therapy
Longitudinal Changes In Fatigue And Health Status (aims2) In Ra Patients Treated With Sc Anti-tnf-alpha Therapy
People affected by rheumatoid arthritis are often suffering from fatigue and decreased QOL. In this study we are measuring the impact of SC biologics on these parameters.
Observational prospective study Purely descriptive
Observational
Time Perspective: Prospective
Not Provided
Not Provided
Probability Sample
patients seen in a rheumatology practice
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Other: SC anti-TNF
SC anti-TNF
RA Patients treated with SC anti-TNF
Intervention: Other: SC anti-TNF
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
62
75
February 2014
February 2014   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients who:

  • Are active RA patients (as judged by treating MD)
  • Are 18 years of age or older at time of consent
  • Are scheduled by their rheumatologist to initiate SC anti-TNF-α therapy + MTX

Exclusion Criteria:

Use of biologics (or any experimental drug) in the last 3 months before initiation of SC anti-TNF-α therapy.

Participation in other clinical or observational trials

Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Belgium
 
 
NCT01521884
0881A1-4748
B1801046 ( Other Identifier: Alias Study Number )
No
Not Provided
Not Provided
Pfizer
Pfizer
Not Provided
Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center Pfizer
Pfizer
February 2015