Now Available: Final Rule for FDAAA 801 and NIH Policy on Clinical Trial Reporting

Comparison of Lixisenatide Injected Prior to the Main Meal of the Day Versus Prior to Breakfast in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Metformin

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Sanofi
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01517412
First received: January 16, 2012
Last updated: August 22, 2016
Last verified: August 2016

January 16, 2012
August 22, 2016
February 2012
May 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Change in HbA1C was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF). On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 14 days after the last dose of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period.
Change in HbA1c [ Time Frame: from baseline to 24 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01517412 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Percentage of Participants With HbA1c Level <7 % or ≤6.5% at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period.
  • Change in Average 7-point SMPG Profiles From Baseline to Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Participants recorded a 7-point plasma glucose profile measured before and 2 hours after each meal and at bedtime two times in a week before baseline, before visit Week 8, before visit Week 12 and before visit week 24. The average value across the profiles performed in the week a visit for the 7-time points was calculated. Change in average 7-point SMPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline 7-point SMPG assessment during on-treatment period.
  • Change in FPG From Baseline to Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Change in FPG was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable was the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline FPG assessment during on-treatment period.
  • Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Change in body weight was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. On-treatment period for this efficacy variable was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with baseline and at least one post-baseline body weight assessment during on-treatment period.
  • Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% at Week 24 And Did Not Experience Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (Plasma Glucose [PG] <60 mg/dL [3.3 mmol/L]) During 24-Week Treatment Period [ Time Frame: Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from hypoglycemic episode with an accompanying PG<60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L) or associated with prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate if no PG measurement was available. On-treatment period for symptomatic hypoglycemia assessment was defined as time from first dose of study drug up to 1 day after last dose of study drug. Participants without any post-baseline on-treatment value for HbA1c were counted as non-responders if they experienced at least one symptomatic hypoglycemia. Otherwise, they were counted as missing.
  • Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% And Had No Body Weight Gain at Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Participants without post-baseline on-treatment values for (HbA1c and body weight) that were no more than 30 days apart were counted as non-responders if at least one of the components (HbA1c and/or body weight) was available and showed no response. Otherwise, they were counted as missing.
  • Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% And Had No Body Weight Gain at Week 24 And Did Not Experience Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycemia (PG<60 mg/dL [3.3 mmol/L]) During the 24-Week Treatment Period [ Time Frame: Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    Participants without post-baseline on-treatment values (for HbA1c and body weight) that were no more than 30 days apart not more than 30-days apart were counted as non-responders if at least one of components (HbA1c and/or body weight) was available and showed no response. Otherwise, they were counted as missing.
  • Percentage of Participants Who Reached the Target of HbA1c <7% And Had a 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) <140mg/dL After Breakfast or Main Meal At Week 24 [ Time Frame: Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    On-treatment period for 2-hour PPG assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to the day of last dose of study drug. Participants without post-baseline on-treatment values (for HbA1c and 2-hour PPG) that were no more than 30-days apart were counted as non-responders if at least one of the components (HbA1cand/or 2-hour PPG) was available and showed no response. Otherwise, they were counted as missing.
  • Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Score (DTSQs) From Baseline to Week 24 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
    DTSQ is a validated measure to assess how satisfied participants with diabetes are with their treatment and how they perceive hyper- and hypoglycemia. It consists of 8 questions which are answered on a Likert scale from 0 to 6. DTSQ treatment satisfaction score is the sum of question 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 scores and ranges between 0 and 36, where higher scores indicate more treatment satisfaction. On-treatment period for treatment satisfaction assessment was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of participants analyzed = participants with both baseline and Week 24 DTSQ score assessment during on-treatment period.
  • Percentage of patients reaching HbA1c <7 % [ Time Frame: at week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Percentage of patients reaching HbA1c ≤6.5 % [ Time Frame: at week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change in 7-point self-monitored plasma glucose profile [ Time Frame: from baseline to 24 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change in Fasting plasma glucose [ Time Frame: from baseline to 24 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Change in Body weight [ Time Frame: from baseline to 24 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Comparison of Lixisenatide Injected Prior to the Main Meal of the Day Versus Prior to Breakfast in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Metformin
A 24-week, Open-label, Randomized, 2-arm Parallel Group, Multinational, Multi-center Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lixisenatide Injected Prior to the Main Meal of the Day Versus Lixisenatide Injected Prior to Breakfast in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Not Adequately Controlled on Metformin

Primary Objective:

- To compare the two treatment regimens in terms of change of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to endpoint (Week 24)

Secondary Objective:

  • To assess the effect of the 2 lixisenatide regimens on:

    • The percentage of participants who reached the target of HbA1c < 7% or ≤ 6.5% at Week 24
    • Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
    • 7-point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG) profiles
    • Body weight
  • To assess the safety and tolerability of the 2 lixisenatide regimens
The maximum study duration was 28 weeks per participant, including a 24-week randomized treatment period.
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010)
    Pharmaceutical form: Solution for injection; Route of administration: Subcutaneous
  • Device: Self-injector pen device (OptiClik®)
  • Drug: Metformin
    To be kept at stable dose (≥1.5 g/day) throughout the study.
    Other Name: Route of administration: Oral
  • Experimental: Lixisenatide Main Meal
    Lixisenatide 10 mcg once daily (QD) within 1 hour before "main meal of the day" for 2 weeks, then at a maintenance dose of 20 mcg QD up to Week 24.
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010)
    • Device: Self-injector pen device (OptiClik®)
    • Drug: Metformin
  • Active Comparator: Lixisenatide Breakfast
    Lixisenatide 10 mcg QD within 1 hour before "breakfast" for 2 weeks, then at a maintenance dose of 20 mcg QD up to Week 24.
    Interventions:
    • Drug: Lixisenatide (AVE0010)
    • Device: Self-injector pen device (OptiClik®)
    • Drug: Metformin
Ahrén B, Vorokhobina N, Souhami E, Demil N, Ye J, Aronson R. Equal improvement in glycaemia with lixisenatide given before breakfast or the main meal of the day. J Diabetes Complications. 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):735-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.05.012.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
451
May 2013
May 2013   (final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion criteria:

  • Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus, diagnosed for at least 1 year before screening visit
  • Metformin treatment at a stable dose of at least 1.5 g/day for at least 3 months prior to screening visit.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Screening HbA1c < 7.0% and > 10.0%
  • Fasting plasma glucose at screening > 250 mg/dL (> 13.9 mmol/L)
  • Treatment with glucose-lowering agent(s) other than metformin in a period of 3 months prior to screening, previous use of insulin
  • Participants who usually did not eat breakfast
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 20 kg/m^2 and > 40 kg/m^2
  • Pregnancy or lactation, women of childbearing potential with no effective contraceptive method
  • Amylase and/or lipase > 3 times the upper limit of the normal laboratory range ( ULN) at screening
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 3 ULN at screening
  • Calcitonin ≧ 20 pg/ml (5.9 pmol/L) at screening
  • History of unexplained pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy.
  • Personal or immediate family history of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) or genetic conditions that predisposes to MTC (e.g. multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes)
  • Any contra-indication related to metformin
  • Any previous treatment with lixisenatide

The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Both
18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States,   Canada,   Czech Republic,   France,   Germany,   Poland,   Romania,   Russian Federation,   Spain,   Ukraine
 
NCT01517412
EFC12261, 2011-002416-85, U1111-1118-0841
Yes
Not Provided
Not Provided
Sanofi
Sanofi
Not Provided
Study Director: Clinical Sciences & Operations Sanofi
Sanofi
August 2016

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP