This site became the new ClinicalTrials.gov on June 19th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu IMPORTANT: Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu
Give us feedback

Randomized Isoflurane and Sevoflurane Comparison in Cardiac Surgery (RISCCS)

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Philip Jones, Lawson Health Research Institute
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01477151
First received: November 16, 2011
Last updated: June 3, 2015
Last verified: June 2015
History of Changes
November 16, 2011
June 3, 2015
November 2011
March 2015   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Composite of: prolonged ICU stay (>= 48 hours) OR death within 30 days of operation [ Time Frame: 30 days of operation ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01477151 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Postoperative cardiac troponin T [ Time Frame: 6 hours after admission to ICU ]
    Troponin T sampled at 6 hours after admission to the ICU. The time of sampling will be recorded. The sample will be taken from an indwelling venous or arterial cannula (if one exists) or by venipuncture.
  • Length of stay in the ICU (criteria) [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 1 day ]
    The time from admission in ICU (time 0) until the patient's transfer orders to the floor are enacted.
  • 30-day all-cause mortality [ Time Frame: 30 days after operation ]
    A participant who has died for any reason before the end of 30th day after the operation. Day 1 is the first calendar day after first being admitted to the ICU.
  • Duration of tracheal intubation [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 1 day ]
    The time from being admitted to the ICU (time 0) until the patient's tracheal tube is removed for the first time.
  • Inotrope or vasopressor usage in the ICU [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 1 day ]
    A participant who is treated at any time after the first hour of their ICU stay with an inotropic or vasopressor by infusion.
  • Prolonged inotrope or vasopressor usage in the ICU [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 1 day ]
    Any patient requiring 12 or more continuous hours of any combination of inotropic or vasopressor agent (including the first hour) in the ICU.
  • Peak postoperative serum creatinine [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week ]
    Peak postoperative creatinine as recorded in the hospital chart.
  • New-onset dialysis [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week ]
    Any patient, not previously on dialysis, requiring postoperative dialysis (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis).
  • Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation [ Time Frame: Until end of post-operative day 4 ]
    We will capture the proportion of patients who have clinically significant new atrial fibrillation at any time from ICU admission until the end of POD 4. The adjudication of atrial fibrillation will be recorded by the blinded research nurse.
  • Incidence of intra-aortic balloon pump usage [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 1 day ]
    The proportion of patients having an intra-aortic balloon pump inserted (either in the operating room or in the ICU).
  • Length of stay in the ICU (actual) [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 1 day ]
    The time from admission in ICU (time 0) until the patient is discharged from the ICU.
  • Length of stay in the hospital (actual) [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week ]
    The time from admission to the ICU until the patient is discharged home from the hospital.
  • Readmission to ICU [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week ]
    Readmission to the ICU for any reason.
  • Perioperative stroke [ Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week ]
    A new neurological abnormality persisting > 24 hours with documentation by formal neurological examination and evidence of new brain lesions on a brain imaging study.
  • 1-year all-cause mortality [ Time Frame: One year after operation ]
    A participant who has died for any reason within the first year after the operation. For example, if the operation takes place on June 20 2011, then mortality up to and including June 19 2012 will be counted.
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Randomized Isoflurane and Sevoflurane Comparison in Cardiac Surgery
Randomized Isoflurane and Sevoflurane Comparison in Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.
Anesthesia practice in the 21st century is increasingly outcomes-oriented and evidence-based, but there remain significant gaps in our knowledge, even for commonly-encountered clinical situations. Currently, the two most commonly used drugs used for maintenance of anesthesia in cardiac surgical patients are isoflurane and sevoflurane. There is a belief among many cardiac anesthesiologists that sevoflurane is a better cardiac anesthetic than isoflurane, but there is very little data to support this notion. In fact, very little is known about their comparative effects on important patient outcomes because there has not been a large head-to-head prospective randomized clinical trial. This project will supply the data necessary to critically compare the two anesthetics.
Current evidence supports the superiority of sevoflurane for myocardial protection during cardiac surgery when compared to total intravenous anesthesia with propofol. However, there is no evidence to suggest that sevoflurane is superior to isoflurane for myocardial protection during cardiac surgery. Sevoflurane may potentially reduce the rate of post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation and the time to tracheal extubation compared to isoflurane, but the literature is equivocal on these two important outcomes. Anesthesiologists still frequently use isoflurane for maintenance of cardiac anesthesia, and this is likely because there is substantial uncertainty about whether or not sevoflurane is superior to isoflurane, given the lack of head-to-head RCTs. A large, prospective, pragmatic RCT can ultimately assist clinicians by providing evidence of the non-inferiority (or, possibly the superiority) of one anesthetic compared to the other on important patient outcomes such as ICU length of stay, mortality, renal dysfunction, time to tracheal extubation after cardiac surgery, rates of clinically-important atrial fibrillation, and myocardial damage.
Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Valvular Heart Disease
Drug: Volatile anesthetic

The intervention in this trial is randomization to either maintenance of anesthesia with sevoflurane or maintenance of anesthesia with isoflurane. The designated volatile anesthetic will be given at a strict minimal amount throughout the entire cardiac surgery (including cardiopulmonary bypass). This regimen (administration throughout the entire operation) has proved to have the greatest efficacy. Apart from this intervention, the anesthetic for patients participating in this trial will not be substantially different from normal practice, as the intention is to allow normal practice (with the exception of the choice of volatile anesthetic agent) to maximize the applicability and external validity of the trial. The management of anticoagulation, cardiac surgical techniques, and other aspects of the procedure will be managed in an unaltered fashion.

No IV drug infusions will be permitted until after protamine administration.
  • Active Comparator: sevoflurane
    These patients will receive sevoflurane as the volatile anesthetic pre-, during-, and post-cardiopulmonary bypass at a targeted dose of 0.5-2.0 MAC.
    Intervention: Drug: Volatile anesthetic
  • Experimental: isoflurane
    These patients will receive isoflurane as the volatile anesthetic pre-, during-, and post-cardiopulmonary bypass at a targeted dose of 0.5-2.0 MAC.
    Intervention: Drug: Volatile anesthetic
Jones PM, Bainbridge D, Chu MW, Fernandes PS, Fox SA, Iglesias I, Kiaii B, Lavi R, Murkin JM. Comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane in cardiac surgery: a randomized non-inferiority comparative effectiveness trial. Can J Anaesth. 2016 Oct;63(10):1128-39. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0706-y. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
464
March 2015
March 2015   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must be 18 years or over (There is no upper age limit to enrollment)
  • Eligible procedures are: CABG on-pump or off-pump, single valve repair/replacement, or CABG/single valve combined procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac surgeries that are not one of the included cases
  • Planned extubation in the operating room
  • Patients refusing blood products (vis à vis blood sampling)
  • Pregnant patients
  • Malignant hyperthermia or documented/stated allergy to potent volatile anesthetic agents
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Canada
 
 
NCT01477151
16497
Yes
Not Provided
Not Provided
Philip Jones, Lawson Health Research Institute
Lawson Health Research Institute
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Philip M Jones, MD MSc Lawson Health Research Institute
Lawson Health Research Institute
June 2015

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP