We updated the design of this site on December 18, 2017. Learn more.
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and P50 Evoked Potential Component (rTMS-P50)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01466439
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : November 8, 2011
Last Update Posted : June 10, 2013
Information provided by (Responsible Party):

October 19, 2011
November 8, 2011
June 10, 2013
May 2011
June 2012   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
P50 Ratio Stimulation 2/S stimulation 1 [ Time Frame: day of stimulation (day 1) ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01466439 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and P50 Evoked Potential Component
Evaluation of Effect of Low and High-frequencies of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) by the Suppression of P50 Evoked Potential Component (rTMS-P50)

The repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a recent technique that has demonstrated its efficiency in both depression and schizophrenia. However if its efficiency has been recognized by the scientific community and the clinicians, its action on neurons and cerebral networks remains debated.

In the motor regions, the different rTMS studies generally use frequencies of stimulation of 1 to 40 Hz with differential effects; the low frequencies being associated with an inhibitory effect whereas highest frequencies have rather some facilitator effects as attested by the motor responses. What is valid for the motor system is not however necessarily applicable to other cerebral regions that have different neuronal organizations. If it is easy to observe these opposite effects of rTMS on the motor system (presence or absence of movements), these potential effects on more integrated cortex involved in high level functions have not been proved.

One of the possibilities to interpret the effects of the rTMS in no-motor cerebral regions would be to study the modifications of the EEG before and after rTMS and to see if a differential effect of the high and low frequencies of stimulation exists. Up to now, the studies having coupled these two techniques have observed modifications of the brain electric activity only during some seconds to minutes after rTMS, what appears in contrast with the clinical effects observed after a long delay (several days).

The contribution of our research resides in the use of the paradigm of suppression of P50 evoked potential component before and after rTMS tested with low and high frequencies of stimulation. This paradigm consists in two identical auditory stimuli presented at a very short interval (generally 500 milliseconds), the second sound generating a P50 wave of weaker amplitude than the first or being completely abolished in healthy subjects. However, this effect that has been well studied could result from an inhibitory action due to the gabaergic interneurons on the pyramidal neurons of the cortex. Thus, the investigators hypothesize that high frequency rTMS would have a facilitator effect on temporal lobe and so would induce no suppression of the P50 after-rTMS whereas low frequency rTMS would induce an inhibitory effect marked by a greater suppression of the P50.

Methods: 30 healthy subjects (of which 16 women) will be included after written consent. They will receive after randomization 2 sessions of rTMS in cross over at 1Hz and 20Hz at 30 days interval. An EEG and a P50 evoked potential will be done before and after rTMS. The site of stimulation will be determined by neuronavigation and will correspond to the maximal activation cluster generated by a language task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. The main judgment criterion is the S2/S1 ratio of the P50. The potential secondary effects will be evaluated (UKU adapted). The secondary criteria are the comparisons before and after rTMS of EEG spectrums in the alpha, beta and gamma bands.

Not Provided
Phase 2
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Depression
  • Schizophrenia
  • Procedure: high-frequency of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
    frequency of stimulation of 20 Hz
  • Procedure: low frequency of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
    frequency of stimulation of 1 Hz
  • high frequency rTMS
    Intervention: Procedure: high-frequency of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
  • low frequency rTMS
    Intervention: Procedure: low frequency of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
June 2013
June 2012   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy subjects, right-handed, aged from 18 to 60 years
  • written consent
  • with social security

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy, breastfeeding
  • brain tumor or epilepsy
  • psychiatric, neurological or ear-nose-throat disorders, current or past
  • healthy subjects with psychotropic drugs or with substance abuses
  • healthy subjects with tabacco weaning
  • protected major with tutor
  • counter-indication to MRI and rTMS
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years to 60 Years   (Adult)
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Not Provided
Not Provided
University Hospital, Caen
University Hospital, Caen
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Pr Sonia Dollfus, MD, PhD University Hospital, Caen
University Hospital, Caen
June 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP