We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Effect of Exercise With Low Intensity and Longer Duration Versus High Intensity Interval Training

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01443507
First Posted: September 29, 2011
Last Update Posted: December 10, 2014
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Collaborator:
helse Møre og Romsdal, Volda sjukehus
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Kjetil Laurits Hoydal, Volda University College
September 21, 2011
September 29, 2011
December 10, 2014
October 2011
October 2012   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
changes in maximal oxygen uptake [ Time Frame: Maximal oxygen uptake will be measured at day 1 before training, then we will measure changes in maximal oxygen uptake after 8 weeks, and finally a follow up measurement of changes in maximal oxygen uptake after 1 year ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01443507 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • endurance performance [ Time Frame: one year ]
    work economy, lactate threshold will be measured toghether with maximal oxygen uptake to determine endurance performance.
  • health effects [ Time Frame: one year ]
    coronary flow reserve, blood pressure, maximal oxygen uptake
  • endurance performance [ Time Frame: one year ]
    work economy, lactate threshold will be measured toghether with maximal oxygen uptake to determine endurance performance.
  • health effects [ Time Frame: one year ]
    coronary flow reserve, lipid profile, blood pressure, maximal oxygen uptake
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Effect of Exercise With Low Intensity and Longer Duration Versus High Intensity Interval Training
Does Endurance Exercise With Low Intensity and Longer Duration Improve Aerobic Capacity to the Same Extent as High Intensity Interval Training?
The purpose of the study is to compare exercise at 70% of maximal heart rate were total energy expenditure is twice compared to interval training at 90- 95% of maximal heart rate. Since 70% of maximal heart rate is well above the minimum threshold for improvements in maximal oxygen uptake it should be suited to investigate the effect of duration.
Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 2
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Healthy Subjects
Other: endurance exercise of different duration and intensity
Two interventions are compared with aerobic capacity as the main outcome. one group exercise at 70% of maximal heart rate for 90 minutes 3 times per week. group two exercise performe10 minutes warm up at 70% of maximal heart rate 4 x 4 minutes intervals at 90-95% of maximal heart rate with 3 minutes active pause at 70% of maximal heart rate in between, and finally 5 minutes cooling down at 70 % of maximal heart rate.
  • Experimental: high intensity long interval
    A group training four by four minutes interval at 90-95% of maximal heart rate dispersed by three minutes active pauses at 70% of maximal heart rate.
    Intervention: Other: endurance exercise of different duration and intensity
  • Experimental: long duration at moderate training
    a continuous training group exercising at 70% of maximal heart rate for 90 minutes.
    Intervention: Other: endurance exercise of different duration and intensity
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
22
October 2012
October 2012   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy non smoking men and woman, age 18-30

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pathological findings measured by ekko/doppler, high cholesterol or high blood pressure
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years to 30 Years   (Adult)
Yes
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Norway
 
 
NCT01443507
2010/2959
No
Not Provided
Not Provided
Kjetil Laurits Hoydal, Volda University College
Volda University College
helse Møre og Romsdal, Volda sjukehus
Study Director: Aud Folkestad, dean Volda University College
Volda University College
December 2014

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP