Foley Catheter Versus Cervidil for Induction of Labor at Term
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01402050|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : July 26, 2011
Results First Posted : February 6, 2020
Last Update Posted : March 2, 2020
- Study Details
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- How to Read a Study Record
|First Submitted Date ICMJE||April 8, 2011|
|First Posted Date ICMJE||July 26, 2011|
|Results First Submitted Date ICMJE||January 24, 2020|
|Results First Posted Date ICMJE||February 6, 2020|
|Last Update Posted Date||March 2, 2020|
|Study Start Date ICMJE||June 2010|
|Actual Primary Completion Date||November 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||Time Of Start Of Induction Of Labor To Delivery [ Time Frame: Hours ]
The primary outcome variable was time (measured in hours) from first attempt at study agent placement to delivery. Time of placement of Labor Induction agent was noted as the time of Labor Induction initiation and time of delivery was noted as the end time of Labor Induction. There were no specific time points at which the outcomes were measured due to the uncertainty of the labor process. Total time duration of Labor induction was noted in hours. Key word: INDUCTION OF LABOR
|Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||Time Of Start Of Induction Of Labor To Delivery [ Time Frame: 2 Years ]|
|Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Current Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures||Not Provided|
|Original Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures||Not Provided|
|Brief Title ICMJE||Foley Catheter Versus Cervidil for Induction of Labor at Term|
|Official Title ICMJE||A Randomized Controlled Trial of Transcervical Foley Balloon Compared to Controlled Release Prostaglandin (Cervidil) for Labor Induction and Cervical Ripening in Term and Near Term Women|
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of transcervical Foley catheter compared to controlled release prostaglandin (Cervidil™) for cervical ripening in term and near term women presenting for labor induction.
HYPOTHESIS: In term and near term women presenting for labor induction, transcervical Foley catheter will decrease the mean time from induction to delivery by six hours compared to controlled release prostaglandin (Cervidil™).
Induction of labor is performed in 25% of all women who present for delivery at the Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center (1). The commonality of labor induction is not only a local issue. The national cesarean rate has risen to 31.1%, which represents a 50% increase since 1996 (2). Part of the reason for this increase in the cesarean delivery rate is the pervasive use of labor induction. This risk can be mitigated with the use of cervical ripening agents when a cervix is unfavorable for induction. Both pharmacological (prostaglandin analogues) ripening agents and mechanical methods are utilized, but no single method has been shown to offer a significant advantage over the other methods. Many centers, including ours, have several different methods available, since each ripening method may have one or more unique contraindications for their use during labor induction.
One emerging modality for cervical ripening and labor induction has been transcervical Foley balloon catheter placement, which is thought to operate by mechanical dilation of the cervix. The modality has become popular in part due to its efficacy, safety and low cost. The most popular method of labor induction at Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center is a controlled release prostaglandin application (Cervidil™). This modality is expensive and may require more than one dose, thus increasing duration of labor induction and hospital costs. A thorough literature search was performed on PubMed with the search terms "foley" "labor induction" "prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert" from 1972 to 2009 and to date there have been no randomized trials comparing the efficacy of these two modalities for labor induction. Additionally, the clinical trials.gov site (www.clinicaltrials.gov) was searched and there are no active or previously complete studies of Cervidil™ compared to transcervical Foley balloon for labor induction. Therefore, we propose a randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the comparative efficacies of these two modalities for cervical ripening and labor induction in term and near term women.
All HIPAA and GCP regulations will be followed and IRB approval will be obtained.
This is a randomized controlled trial conducted at Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center (BGSMC) and Banner Desert Medical Center (BDMC) beginning February 1, 2010 and continuing until approximately 330 patients have been enrolled. Patients will be allocated by an online randomization system either to transcervical Foley catheter or controlled release prostaglandin (Cervidil™) in a 1:1 ratio. The Foley catheter used will be a 30cc/24 F. The Foley bulb is placed in the cervix and a balloon is filled with water to apply pressure to the cervix in order for the mechanical dilatation to occur. After the Foley catheter is placed, the RN will check (by gently tugging) the placement of the catheter every 2 hours until dislodged. Foley catheter will be removed either by spontaneous expulsion or after 12 hours if not expelled.
If the patient is randomized to the controlled release prostaglandin (Cervidil™) arm, a controlled release prostaglandin (Cervidil™) will be placed in the posterior fornix of the vagina to help ripen, or dilate and soften the cervix and removed after 12 hours. This medication may be repeated for an additional 12 hours per the physicians orders and standard of care procedures. The controlled release prostaglandin (Cervidil™) should be removed sooner if tachysystole (defined as more than 5 uterine contractions in 10 minutes) is noted.
After expulsion of the Foley catheter or after 12 hours in either group, oxytocin will be started according to the hospital's administration protocol. Otherwise, labor management will be at the discretion of the attending physician. Prophylactic antibiotics will not be administered unless indicated (GBS prophylaxis, chorioamnionitis develops during labor, etc).
A master subject list will be generated. Data collection forms will assign unique patient numbers starting with one and correlating with the master list. Data collection forms will not contain patient names, but the master list will have a number correlated with the patient ID. The data collection forms will collect demographic information including the date of birth for statistical analysis. All lists will be kept confidential and stored under locked conditions. The master list will be destroyed once the study is complete and the final report has been written.
A. Patient Demographics (date of birth, race, height, weight) B. Vital signs C. Maternal Comorbidities (Chronic Hypertension, Gestational Hypertension, Diabetes, Obesity or BMI) D. Induction Indications (Abnormal Antepartum Testing, Prior pregnancies, mode of deliveries, Pre-eclampsia, > 41 weeks gestation, Group Beta Strep status E. Physical Exam (Sterile vaginal exam, Membrane status) F. Study medication/device information (time of administration, removal, success of placement) G. Other induction medications (if indicated) H. Intrapartum antibiotics (if yes, reason for administration) I. Delivery data (date, time, mode of delivery)
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics will be used, with continuous variables reported as means and standard deviations and categorical variables as percentages. T-tests will be used to analyze continuous variables and the Chi square test for categorical variables. Linear regression will be used to determine predictors of the primary outcome, and logistic regression for categorical outcomes. A two-tailed p < 0.05 will be considered significant.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION: From review of the available literature evaluating these two modalites for labor induction (in separate studies), we make the following assumptions for our power calculation: 1. The mean time to delivery in the Cervidil group will be 24 hours. 2. The standard deviation for time to delivery in each group will be 15 hours. 3. A clinically significant decrease in the time to delivery in the Foley group is 6 hours (to a mean of 18 hours). With an alpha of 0.05 and 1-beta of 0.90, a sample size of 264 (132 in each group) is needed. Allowing a 20% cesarean delivery rate, so that a separate analysis can be performed for only those patients who delivered vaginally, the total number of women needed to be enrolled is 330.
INTERIM DATA ANALYSIS:
Because of the novel nature of this comparative induction regimen, an interim analysis and a futility analysis will be pursed when the first 100 of the study patients have been enrolled. The futility analysis will help direct trial progress.
A Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will be in place at the start of the study. The DSMB will comprise an independent obstetrician-gynecologist, a statistician and a bioethicist. It will regularly review SAE's.
It will also conduct an interim analysis when 100 subjects have had deliveries. Using the O'Brien-Fleming method, the p value for stopping the study due to superiority is 0.0051. At the final analysis, the remaining alpha for determining superiority is 0.0477. For the futility analysis, when 100 subjects have had a vaginal deliveries, a conditional power will be calculated. If the conditional power is < 0.20, then the study will be halted due to futility.
|Study Type ICMJE||Interventional|
|Study Phase ICMJE||Not Applicable|
|Study Design ICMJE||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Condition ICMJE||Labor Induction|
|Study Arms ICMJE||
|Publications *||Edwards RK, Szychowski JM, Berger JL, Petersen M, Ingersoll M, Bodea-Braescu AV, Lin MG. Foley catheter compared with the controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1280-1287. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000238.|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
|Recruitment Status ICMJE||Completed|
|Actual Enrollment ICMJE
|Original Estimated Enrollment ICMJE
|Actual Study Completion Date ICMJE||February 2015|
|Actual Primary Completion Date||November 2014 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Eligibility Criteria ICMJE||
|Ages ICMJE||18 Years to 45 Years (Adult)|
|Accepts Healthy Volunteers ICMJE||Yes|
|Contacts ICMJE||Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects|
|Listed Location Countries ICMJE||United States|
|Removed Location Countries|
|NCT Number ICMJE||NCT01402050|
|Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE||01-10-0012|
|Has Data Monitoring Committee||Yes|
|U.S. FDA-regulated Product||Not Provided|
|IPD Sharing Statement ICMJE||
|Current Responsible Party||Pediatrix|
|Original Responsible Party||RODNEY EDWARDS, MD, BANNER HEALTH|
|Current Study Sponsor ICMJE||Pediatrix|
|Original Study Sponsor ICMJE||Banner Health|
|Collaborators ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Verification Date||February 2020|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP