We updated the design of this site on December 18, 2017. Learn more.
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Resistance Training to Improve Physical Function in the Elderly

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01385475
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 30, 2011
Last Update Posted : June 30, 2011
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Information provided by:
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

June 22, 2011
June 30, 2011
June 30, 2011
June 2009
December 2010   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Functionality [ Time Frame: 8 weeks ]
Change in Short Performance Physical Battery (SPPB) score is used as a measure of functionality. The SPPB consists of three tasks designed to assess gait speed, and ability to rise from a chair and maintain standing balance. This is a common test to assess function, with scores ranging from 0-12. The higher score equates to a better level of function.
Same as current
No Changes Posted
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Resistance Training to Improve Physical Function in the Elderly
Efficacy of Resistance Training Guidelines to Improve Function in Older Adults
The primary purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the current resistance training guidelines for older adults proposed by ACSM/AHA to improve physical function in individuals with reduced physical abilities. A randomized controlled intervention trial will be used to compare change in physical function pre- and post-intervention between a treatment group receiving the minimum recommendations of the guidelines and a control group asked not to change their physical activity participation. To better understand the clinical significance of such an occurrence, a secondary purpose was to determine if older adults with reduced physical abilities who adhere to the recommended intervention dosage will experience a change such that they can be reclassified to a more favorable level of functioning. It is hypothesized that the minimum recommended dosage of the guidelines would be sufficient to both improve physical function and improve functional classification in older adults with reduced physical abilities.
Not Provided
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
Physical Function
Behavioral: RT
8 week RT Intervention
Experimental: Control
Intervention: Behavioral: RT
Gennuso KP, Zalewski K, Cashin SE, Strath SJ. Resistance training congruent with minimal guidelines improves function in older adults: a pilot study. J Phys Act Health. 2013 Aug;10(6):769-76. Epub 2012 Oct 10.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
June 2011
December 2010   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older Adults aged >65yrs; reduced physical function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with a history of resistance training
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
65 Years to 90 Years   (Adult, Senior)
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
K01AG025962 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )
Not Provided
Not Provided
Scott J Strath PhD, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Study Director: Scott J Strath, PhD University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
June 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP