Medical and Endovascular Treatment of Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis (METRAS Study) (METRAS)
Recruitment status was: Not yet recruiting
|First Received Date ICMJE||September 23, 2010|
|Last Updated Date||November 3, 2010|
|Start Date ICMJE||December 2010|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date||December 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||Glomerular filtration rate in the ischemic kidney after revascularization by means of percutaneous renal angioplasty (PTRAS) or optimal medical treatment. [ Time Frame: 24 months ]
The Primary Objective of the study is to determine if revascularization by means of PTRAS is superior or equivalent to optimal medical treatment for preserving glomerular filtration rate in the ischemic kidney as assessed by 99TcDTPA sequential renal scintiscan
|Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Same as current|
|Change History||Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01208714 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site|
|Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE
|Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Same as current|
|Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Brief Title ICMJE||Medical and Endovascular Treatment of Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis (METRAS Study)|
|Official Title ICMJE||Endovascular Treatment Versus Optimal Medical Treatment of Atherosclerotic Renal Artery for Preserving Renal Function of the Ischemic Kidney.|
Renal atherosclerotic stenosis (RAS) is a prevalent cause of secondary hypertension (HT). Since there are still uncertainties as to whether and in what patients revascularization by means of percutaneous renal angioplasty (PTRAS) should be pursued, we designed a study exploiting an optimized patient selection strategy and using hard experimental endpoints to unravel these uncertainties.
Primary objective: to determine if revascularization by means of PTRAS is superior or equivalent to optimal medical treatment for preserving glomerular filtration rate in the ischemic kidney as assessed by 99mTcDTPA sequential renal scintiscan.
Secondary objectives: to determine if the two treatments are equivalent in lowering blood pressure (BP), preserving overall renal function and regressing damage in the target organs of hypertension.
Design: prospective multicenter randomized, unblinded two-arm study.
Eligible patients will have clinical and/or radiological evidence of unilateral or bilateral RAS, defined by stenosis of the proximal portion of the renal artery and its main bifurcations at angioCT. Duplex scan will exclude nephroangiosclerosis as the latter could bias the assessment of the outcome of revascularization.
Inclusion criteria. RAS affecting the main renal artery or its major branches at angio-CT either > 70% or, if < 70 with post-stenotic dilatation.
Renal function will be assessed with 99mTc-DTPA renal scintigraphy.
Sample size (30 patients per arm) was calculated to have a 90% power to detect a difference in means of GFR in the vascularized (or control untreated kidney) of 7.5 ml/min.
The absolute value of GFR assessed by 99TcDTPA in the ischemic kidney will be used as quantitative variable and compared between groups at each time point. A categorical definition of kidney loss, defined as a GFR in the ischemic kidney of < 5 ml/min, will be also used and the rate of achievement of such endpoint will be compared.
Duration: 5 years.
Background Renal atherosclerotic stenosis (RAS) is an increasingly prevalent causes of secondary hypertension (HT), and is becoming one of the first causes of end-stage renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy in an aging population. Atherosclerotic RAS is associated with a high cardiovascular risk profile leading to a considerable excess rate of morbidity and mortality from stroke, coronary heart and peripheral vascular disease.
Recent advances in antihypertensive drug therapy and in intensive risk factor management prompted the undertaking of prospective randomized trials that compared percutaneous renal angioplasty (PTRAS) with medical therapy. Unexpectedly, these trials failed to show compelling benefits of revascularization when added to effective medical therapy. However, they had serious limitations, which raised a number of criticisms, and limited to weight of their conclusions. Hence, clinicians are still left with uncertainties as to whether and in what patients revascularization should be pursued.
It is conceivable that only a study design exploiting an optimized patient selection strategy and a use of hard experimental endpoints could resolve these uncertainties and thus lead to a better clinical management of the increasing population with atherosclerotic RAS.
Objectives. The primary objective of the METRAS study is to determine if revascularization by means of PTRAS is superior or equivalent to optimal medical treatment for preserving glomerular filtration rate in the ischemic kidney as assessed by 99TcDTPA sequential renal scintiscan.
Secondary objectives (see appropriate section) will be to determine if the two treatments are equivalent in lowering blood pressure (BP), preserving overall renal function and regressing damage in the target organs of hypertension.
Design: prospective multicenter randomized, unblinded two-arm study. Enrolment. Eligible patients entail adult hypertensive of both genders with clinical and/or radiological evidence of unilateral or bilateral RAS. Clinical evidence of RAS will be unexplained renal dysfunction (GFR < 60 ml/min), uncontrolled or refractory hypertension (defined as resistant to lifestyle measures and to at least 3 drugs including a diuretic in adequate doses with failure in lowering systolic and diastolic BP to goal) and/or significant worsening of renal function (20% increase of serum creatinine) after administration of ACE inhibitors and/or an abdominal bruit and/or evidence of atherosclerotic involvement of other sites.
Radiological evidence of atherosclerotic RAS will be defined by stenosis of the proximal portion of the renal artery and its main bifurcations at angioCT. Besides Angio-CT, patients will undergo Duplex scan to exclude nephroangiosclerosis as the latter could bias the assessment of the outcome of revascularization.
Eligible subjects will be offered participation to the METRAS study and have to sign an informed written consent.
Inclusion criteria: angio-CT evidence of RAS affecting the main renal artery or its major branches > 70% or, if < 70 with post-stenotic dilatation Exclusion criteria: see dedicated section.
Run-in. Eligible patients will undergo a 4-week run-in period during which BP treatment, LDL-cholesterol, homocysteine and glycemic control will be optimized.
All patients will receive antiplatelet treatment with aspirin or ticlopidine if intolerant ASA, or clopidogrel, if intolerant to ASA and ticlopidine, throughout the study period.
AngioCT will be performed to assess the abdominal aorta and renal artery anatomy and pathology. RAS localization will be assessed blindly by 2 experienced radiologists. Precautions will be adopted to minimize the chances of worsening renal function with angioCT.
99mTc-DTPA renal scintigraphy will be performed on 2 consecutive days, before and after captopril administration, according to available guidelines.
Treatment with ACEI/ARB will be stopped for 3-7 days (depending on drug half-life) before the scintigraphy. If ACEI withdrawal will be held to be unsafe, the captopril scintigraphy will be omitted and only baseline 99mTc-DTPA scintigraphy will be performed.
All on-site measurements from imaging will be validated by a core laboratory at the University of Padova.
Renal function will be assessed with MDRD formula and the reciprocal of creatinine.
Target organ damage (TOD). Transthoracic echocardiogram with Doppler with assessment of LV mass index, relative thickness, the E/A wave peak flow velocity rate and tissue Doppler will be used to detect changes in LV remodeling and diastolic filling. Measurement of pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index will be used to follow the changes in aortic stiffness and vascular damage.
BP. Clinic and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) will be performed to evaluate the BP changes in each treatment arm. ABPM will be used to determine the BP variability (smoothness index) during day and night.
Randomization. A matching algorithm considering both the RI and the presence of unilateral/bilateral stenosis will be used to randomly assign patients to the 2 treatment arms. This randomization strategy will allow us to obtain patients with similar distribution of RI and an equal number of the patients with unilateral and bilateral stenosis in each treatment arm.
Sample size. Power calculation (nQuery Vers, 6.0, Statistical Solutions) showed that assuming a 16% drop-out rate, a common standard deviation of 8.0 ml/min, an equal sample size in each treatment arm, using a two group t-test with a 0.05 2-sided significance level, with 30 patients per arm our study will have a 90% power to detect a difference in means of GFR in the vascularized (or control untreated kidney) of 7.5 ml/min.
Experimental endpoints. The absolute value of GFR assessed by 99TcDTPA in the ischemic kidney will be used as quantitative variable and compared between groups at each time point. Moreover, for the purpose of the Cox regression analysis a categorical definition of kidney loss, defined as a GFR in the ischemic kidney of < 5 ml/min, will be used and the rate of achievement of such endpoint will be compared.
Potential confounders. To minimize the untoward effect of differences in CV risk anti-platelet, lipid-lowering, and antidiabetic agents, when needed, will be given to all patients, and maintained at the same dosage achieved at the end of the run-in period throughout the study. The possible unbalanced distribution of confounders between treatment arms will be handled by calculating the propensity score (8, 9) and entering it in the Cox regression analysis.
Follow-up. Visits will be scheduled at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after revascularization or beginning of the medical therapy. The study will then continue in an observational setting with outpatient visits scheduled at 6-month intervals for 5 years.
Data collection. Data will be collected using specifically designed database and forms (created in Open Clinica; http://www.openclinica.org); they will be monitored in real time and then analyzed at the core laboratory.
Statistical analysis. Comparison of GFR in the ischemic kidney between groups (revascularization vs. medical therapy) at each time point will be performed using t-test, repeated measure ANOVA with adjustment of potential confounders, Cox regression model for loss of kidney function as defined above. Sub-group analysis (comparison unilateral vs bilateral stenosis) will be similarly undertaken. ROC curves will be used to determine if the baseline 99mTc DTPA scintiscan-derived indexes can predict the outcome of treatment using the changes in GFR over time as reference. Bland-Altman plot and analysis will be used to compare the estimate of GFR obtained using cystatin using the overall (right and left kidneys) GFR as reference.
Multivariate techniques and on the propensity score, which considers all relevant covariables that will differ between the revascularization and the medical treatment rate group, will be used to avoid the untoward effect of a possible unbalanced distribution of confounders between treatment arms (D'Agostino RB, Jr. Circulation 2007; Maiolino G. JCEM 2008).
Expected results. The Metras study will clarify whether renal revascularization by means of PTRAS associated with optimal medical therapy is superior or equivalent to optimal medical treatment alone in preventing deterioration of renal function, as assessed as GFR in the ischemic kidney.
A previous study by Radermacher et al suggested that the presence of irreversible renal microvascular changes, e.g. nephroangiosclerosis, could prevent the patients from having benefit with revascularization. In fact an intrarenal resistance index (RI) > 0.80 at the Doppler analysis was claimed to predict no improvement of BP or renal function, as assessed by measuring the creatinine clearance. However, the latter is an index of global function, and therefore provides no information on the GFR of the ischemic kidney.
This study, by randomizing patients for matching RI values, is expected to clarify whether endovascular treatment can slower GFR loss even in the patients with nephroangiosclerosis.
Moreover, by meeting its secondary endpoints it will help clarifying some clinically relevant issues as the BP lowering, the rate of renal and major cardiovascular events, and the change in quality of life with/without endovascular treatment in patients with atherosclerotic RAS.
Duration of the study. The METRAS Study will last for 5 years. This time interval is expected to be sufficient to register renal and major cardiovascular events.
Centers. This study will be performed within the Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension (SIIA) to achieve randomization of the number of patients needed to provide significant power to the study.
A core laboratory in Padova will adjudicate the eligible patients and will randomize patients.
Conclusions and Perspectives. The METRAS Study has been designed to provide a conclusive answer to a very debated question: is angioplasty combined with stenting and associated with optimal medical therapy equivalent to the optimal medical treatment alone in preventing deterioration of renal function, assessed as GFR in the ischemic kidney? A novel approach, consisting in evaluating deterioration of renal function, as assessed as GFR in the ischemic kidney, rather than the overall GFR, will clarify if PTRAS can protect a kidney with stenotic artery from functional declining.
|Study Type ICMJE||Interventional|
|Study Phase||Phase 4|
|Study Design ICMJE||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
|Condition ICMJE||Renal Artery Stenosis|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
|Recruitment Status ICMJE||Unknown status|
|Estimated Enrollment ICMJE||60|
|Estimated Completion Date||March 2016|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date||December 2015 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Eligibility Criteria ICMJE||
|Ages||18 Years and older (Adult, Senior)|
|Accepts Healthy Volunteers||No|
|Contacts ICMJE||Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects|
|Listed Location Countries ICMJE||Italy|
|Removed Location Countries|
|NCT Number ICMJE||NCT01208714|
|Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE||GPR-METRAS|
|Has Data Monitoring Committee||Yes|
|U.S. FDA-regulated Product||Not Provided|
|Plan to Share Data||Not Provided|
|IPD Description||Not Provided|
|Responsible Party||Gian Paolo Rossi, University Hospital Padova|
|Study Sponsor ICMJE||University Hospital Padova|
|Collaborators ICMJE||Not Provided|
|PRS Account||University Hospital Padova|
|Verification Date||September 2010|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP