We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

A Prospective Evaluation of Iodinated Contrast Flow Patterns in Caudal Epidurography With Intentional Lateral Caudal Approach

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01136018
First Posted: June 3, 2010
Last Update Posted: April 19, 2011
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by:
Yonsei University
May 26, 2010
June 3, 2010
April 19, 2011
April 2010
February 2011   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
A prospective evaluation of iodinated contrast flow patterns in caudal epidurography with intentional lateral caudal approach [ Time Frame: during 10 seconds after obtaining the caudal epidurogram ]
Caudal epidural block is useful not only for regional anesthesia of low abdominal, perineal area or lower extremities but for relieving acute or chronic pain of low back and lower extremities. Recently, there were some reports that there was a difference of the contrast flow pattern during lumbar epidural block according to a location of needle tip in the lumbar epidural space. Therefore, the investigator hypothesizes that there is a difference of contrast flow pattern in caudal epidurography when a needle is inserted with intentionally lateral direction.
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01136018 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
A Prospective Evaluation of Iodinated Contrast Flow Patterns in Caudal Epidurography With Intentional Lateral Caudal Approach
Not Provided
Caudal epidural block is useful not only for regional anesthesia of low abdominal, perineal area or lower extremities but for relieving acute or chronic pain of low back and lower extremities. Recently, there were some reports that there was a difference of the contrast flow pattern during lumbar epidural block according to a location of needle tip in the lumbar epidural space. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that there is a difference of contrast flow pattern in caudal epidurography when a needle is inserted with intentionally lateral direction.
Not Provided
Observational
Time Perspective: Prospective
Not Provided
Not Provided
Non-Probability Sample
24
Patient Who Needs Epidural Block
Procedure: insertion needle via intentionally lateral direction.
evaluation of iodinated contrast flow patterns in caudal epidurography with intentional lateral caudal approach
intentional lateral caudal approach
Intervention: Procedure: insertion needle via intentionally lateral direction.
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
22
April 2011
February 2011   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with unilateral radiculopathy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with sepsis
  • chronic infection
  • coagulopathy
  • local infection near the sacral hiatus
  • the allergy of the contrast
  • history of spine surgery, scoliosis and kyphosis
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
20 Years and older   (Adult, Senior)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Korea, Republic of
 
 
NCT01136018
4-2010-0016
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Kyoung-bong Yoon, Anesthesiology in Severance hospital
Yonsei University
Not Provided
Not Provided
Yonsei University
April 2011