S.T.A.R.S.: Sistas Talking About Real Solutions (STARS)
|The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.|
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01028157|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : December 9, 2009
Last Update Posted : December 17, 2013
|First Submitted Date ICMJE||December 4, 2009|
|First Posted Date ICMJE||December 9, 2009|
|Last Update Posted Date||December 17, 2013|
|Study Start Date ICMJE||October 2002|
|Actual Primary Completion Date||March 2006 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||To evaluate the efficacy of a HIV risk-reduction condition relative to general health control condition in reducing HIV-associated sexual behaviors and incident STDs. [ Time Frame: 12 months ]|
|Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Same as current|
|Change History||Complete list of historical versions of study NCT01028157 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site|
|Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||To evaluate the efficacy of a HIV risk-reduction condition relative to general health control condition in enhancing theoretically-derived mediators of HIV-preventive behaviors. [ Time Frame: 12 months ]|
|Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Same as current|
|Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Brief Title ICMJE||S.T.A.R.S.: Sistas Talking About Real Solutions|
|Official Title ICMJE||STARS: Sistas Talking About Real Solutions|
|Brief Summary||STARS: Sistas Talking About Real Solutions is a health education intervention for African-American women, ages 18-29 aimed at reducing their risk for HIV. A total of 855 subjects were recruited from three Kaiser Permanente Medical Centers. Members were randomly selected from the membership database and sent a letter via mail introducing them to the project and inviting them to participate. Letters were followed up with a phone call and potential participants were screened for eligibility. To be able to participate, participants had to be African-American, female, between the ages of 18-29, single, and have at least one act of unprotected sexual intercourse within the last 6 months. Members who were eligible and willing to participate completed a 1-hour baseline assessment survey; STD testing for Chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomoniasis, and HPV; a vaginal swab that was used to determine if they had unprotected sex. They were then randomized into one of two study conditions: (1) a 2-session HIV risk-reduction condition with a safer sex relapse prevention component (2) a 1-session control condition in which participants receive general women's health information and brochures. Participants received a booster session at 6 and 9 months to reinforce intervention materials. Participants completed an assessment survey and received STD testing at 6 and 12 months. The primary aim of this project is to evaluate the efficacy of the HIV risk-reduction/safer sex relapse prevention condition relative to the health and nutritional control group in reducing HIV-associated sexual behaviors and incident STDs over a 12-month follow-up period is to implement.|
The primary aims of the study are: 1) to evaluate the efficacy of the HIV risk-reduction, safer sex relapse prevention condition relative to the general health and nutrition control condition in reducing HIV-associated sexual behaviors and incident STDs over a 12-month follow-up period; 2) to evaluate the efficacy of the HIV risk-reduction, safer sex relapse prevention condition relative to the general health and nutrition control condition in enhancing theoretically-derived mediators of HIV-preventive behaviors.
The study began recruitment into the main trial in October, 2002. By the close of the recruitment window in March 2006, 855 African American women had been randomized to either of the study conditions. The study participants were eligible if they were: (a) unmarried, (b) African American women, (c) ages 18-29, (d) not pregnant, (e) reported at least one act of unprotected sexual intercourse within the last 6 months and, (f) were members of one of the three Kaiser Permanente HMO study sites. The three medical facilities included the Cascade Kaiser Permanente Center, the Southwood Kaiser Permanente Center and, the Panola Kaiser Permanente Center. While there are other Kaiser Permanente Medical facilities in Atlanta, these sites were selected because of the high prevalence of African-American women.
Once recruited via a random selection process, participants returned to a Kaiser Medical Center on a specified Saturday morning for their baseline visit. At the baseline visit participants were: (1) provided a brief overview of the STARS study; (2) provided written informed consent; (3) asked to complete a one hour ACASI survey; (4) asked to provide self-obtained vaginal swab specimen that were assessed for four STDs (Chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomonas, and human papilloma virus) and a new PCR procedure to detect the presence of sperm in vaginal specimen and; (5) randomized to one of the two study conditions using concealment of allocation techniques to minimize assignment bias.
The ACASI is guided by the Theory of Gender and Power and Social Cognitive Theory. The interview has sections on sociodemographics, sexual history, alcohol and drug use, attitudes and outcome expectations related to abstinence and condom use, peer norms, and stress and coping. The administration of the ACASI interview was enhanced by the inclusion of a 60-day calendar that participants complete prior to the interview. This allows a more realistic time frame to reference interview questions and time for the participant to recall and document behavior before beginning the interview. Upon completion of the full assessment, participants provided swabs for STI specimens. All participants with a positive test result were offered free directly observed therapy (DOT) at their participating medical center.
Participants were randomized to one of two study conditions: (1) an HIV safer sex risk-reduction condition with a relapse prevention component and; (2) a general health and nutrition control condition. the HIV safer sex risk-reduction condition consisted of two 4-hour safer sex workshops; the two workshops were guided by the Theory of Gender and Power and Social Cognitive Theory and; held on consecutive Saturdays at the participating medical centers. The sessions were implemented by a team of African American female health educators and had on average of 6 - 8 participants per session. The two study conditions are outlined below:
The HIV safer sex risk-reduction condition with a relapse prevention component: Participants in this condition received the two 4-hour safer sex workshops. The first workshop focused on enhancing ethnic and gender pride, self-esteem, realizing values and setting goals, healthy vs. unhealthy relationships, HIV/STD knowledge, heightening awareness of HIV susceptibility, safer-sex options. The second workshop offered realistic choices in sexual decision making, covering topics including abstinence, masturbation, oral, vaginal, and anal sex. The risk and benefits related to each safer-sex option were examined. Participants also received instruction on safer-sex skills corresponding to each option. Consistent and proper condom use was also discussed and demonstrated with a module on condom skills. This module included activities demonstrating the increased difficulty of proper condom use when under the influence of substances such and drugs and alcohol. Modules on setting limits and boundaries, communication styles, and condom skills negotiation were also a part of this workshop. In addition, an activity was included on indications and ways to deal with partner violence. Workshop II included several role-play scenarios demonstrating how to handle excuses related to safer-sex options and also exhibiting realistic situations that women may face in their sexual relationships. Participants in this condition received 3-hour booster sessions at 6- and 9-months to reinforce materials from the initial intervention. The 6-month booster session included modules that reinforced concepts such as gender and ethnic pride, self-esteem, communicating safer-sex options, assertive communication skills, difficulties communicating with long-term partners, and standing by one's safer-sex decisions. Again, role plays and interactive activities facilitated participants' ability to explore and examine challenges they experienced related to these topics. In a similar fashion, the 9-month booster session reinforced positive safer-sex messages, exploration of past unsafe sexual experiences, mastering safer sex techniques, identifying and making wise decisions about healthy and unhealthy partner characteristics, creative options for safer sex, gender and ethnic pride, and empowerment to make and maintain healthy choices. Bi-monthly phone calls and quarterly mailings were used to reinforce workshop material and facilitate retention.
The control condition: Participants in this condition received a 2 hour group session which consisted of general health information and women's health brochures facilitated by a trained health educator. The control group received bi-monthly phone calls and quarterly mailings for retention purposes only, with no intervention material provided.
Participants in all study conditions received a group introduction including group guidelines, definition of a 'STARS Sista', the STARS motto, pact and group contract.
Follow-up visits: At the 6-month follow-up visit all participants completed the 6-month ACASI to assess potential behavior change and change in the study mediators; and provided specimens for Chlamydia, gonorrhea and trichomoniasis; and provided a specimen for the PCR procedure to detect the presence of sperm in a vaginal sample.
At the 12-month follow-up visit participants completed the 12-month ACASI to assess potential behavior change and change in the study mediators; provided specimens for Chlamydia, gonorrhea and trichomoniasis and HPV (if they did not test positive for HPV at baseline); and provided a specimen for the PCR procedure to detect the presence of sperm in a vaginal sample.
|Study Type ICMJE||Interventional|
|Study Phase||Phase 1|
|Study Design ICMJE||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
|Condition ICMJE||HIV Prevention|
|Publications *||Not Provided|
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
|Recruitment Status ICMJE||Completed|
|Actual Enrollment ICMJE
|Original Actual Enrollment ICMJE||Same as current|
|Actual Study Completion Date||March 2006|
|Actual Primary Completion Date||March 2006 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Eligibility Criteria ICMJE||
|Ages||18 Years to 29 Years (Adult)|
|Accepts Healthy Volunteers||Yes|
|Contacts ICMJE||Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects|
|Listed Location Countries ICMJE||United States|
|Removed Location Countries|
|NCT Number ICMJE||NCT01028157|
|Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE||0524-2002
5R01MH062717 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )
|Has Data Monitoring Committee||No|
|U.S. FDA-regulated Product||Not Provided|
|IPD Sharing Statement||Not Provided|
|Responsible Party||Gina M Wingood, Emory University|
|Study Sponsor ICMJE||Emory University|
|Collaborators ICMJE||National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)|
|PRS Account||Emory University|
|Verification Date||December 2013|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP