ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

ATX Study:A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab), Tarceva (Erlotinib) and Xeloda (Capecitabine) in Patients With Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00925769
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 22, 2009
Results First Posted : August 7, 2015
Last Update Posted : August 7, 2015
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Hoffmann-La Roche

April 15, 2009
June 22, 2009
July 13, 2015
August 7, 2015
August 7, 2015
January 2009
December 2013   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Part 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Capecitabine [ Time Frame: Up to Week 6 (Cycle 1-3) ]
    MTD for each of the medications was defined as the lowest dose studied which resulted in dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least 33 percent (%) of participants of the same quality category. DLT was defined as any greater than or equal to (>=) Grade (G) 3 or G4 toxicity; >= G3 non-hematological toxicities directly related to study treatment (other than untreated nausea/vomiting, alopecia, G3/G4 bilirubinemia for less than 7 days due to edema of the ductus choledochus and anemia); G4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia lasting >= 7 days or G3 thrombocytopenia with complications, requiring transfusions, febrile neutropenia; stopping of oral CAP and/or ERL intake for >= 7 days, and/or cancellation of one or more BEV infusion(s) due to adverse events (AEs).
  • Part 1: MTD of Erlotinib [ Time Frame: Up to Week 6 (Cycle 1-3) ]
    MTD for each of the medications was defined as the lowest dose studied which resulted in DLT in at least 33% of participants of the same quality category. DLT was defined as >= G3 or G4 toxicity; >= G3 non-hematological toxicities directly related to study treatment (other than untreated nausea/vomiting, alopecia, G3/G4 bilirubinemia for less than 7 days due to edema of the ductus choledochus and anemia); G4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia lasting >= 7 days or G3 thrombocytopenia with complications, requiring transfusions, febrile neutropenia; stopping of oral CAP and/or ERL intake for >= 7 days, and/or cancellation of one or more BEV infusion(s) due to AEs.
  • Part 1: MTD of Bevacizumab [ Time Frame: Up to Week 6 (Cycle 1-3) ]
    MTD for each of the medications was defined as the lowest dose studied which resulted in DLT in at least 33% of participants of the same quality category. DLT was defined as >= G3 or G4 toxicity; >= G3 non-hematological toxicities directly related to study treatment (other than untreated nausea/vomiting, alopecia, G3/G4 bilirubinemia for less than 7 days due to edema of the ductus choledochus and anemia); G4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia lasting >= 7 days or G3 thrombocytopenia with complications, requiring transfusions, febrile neutropenia; stopping of oral CAP and/or ERL intake for >= 7 days, and/or cancellation of one or more BEV infusion(s) due to AEs.
  • Part 1: Preliminary Recommended Dose (PRD) of Capecitabine for Part 2 [ Time Frame: Up to Week 6 (Cycle 1-3) ]
    Once the MTD was reached then the preceding lower dose level was used as PRD. MTD for each of the medications was defined as the lowest dose studied which resulted in dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in at least 33% of participants of the same quality category. DLT was defined as >= G3 or G4 toxicity; >= G3 non-hematological toxicities directly related to study treatment (other than untreated nausea/vomiting, alopecia, G3/G4 bilirubinemia for less than 7 days due to edema of the ductus choledochus and anemia); G4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia lasting >= 7 days or G3 thrombocytopenia with complications, requiring transfusions, febrile neutropenia; stopping of oral CAP and/or ERL intake for >= 7 days, and/or cancellation of one or more BEV infusion(s) due to AEs. If MTD was not defined for a drug treatment then the maximum planned dose of that particular drug was considered as PRD for Part 2.
  • Part 1: PRD of Erlotinib for Part 2 [ Time Frame: Up to Week 6 (Cycle 1-3) ]
    Once the MTD was reached then the preceding lower dose level was used as PRD. MTD for each of the medications was defined as the lowest dose studied which resulted in DLT in at least 33% of participants of the same quality category. DLT was defined as >= G3 or G4 toxicity; >= G3 non-hematological toxicities directly related to study treatment (other than untreated nausea/vomiting, alopecia, G3/G4 bilirubinemia for less than 7 days due to edema of the ductus choledochus and anemia); G4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia lasting >= 7 days or G3 thrombocytopenia with complications, requiring transfusions, febrile neutropenia; stopping of oral CAP and/or ERL intake for >= 7 days, and/or cancellation of one or more BEV infusion(s) due to AEs. If MTD was not defined for a drug treatment then the maximum planned dose of that particular drug was considered as PRD for Part 2.
  • Part 1: PRD of Bevacizumab for Part 2 [ Time Frame: Up to Week 6 (Cycle 1-3) ]
    Once the MTD was reached then the preceding lower dose level was used as PRD. MTD for each of the medications was defined as the lowest dose studied which resulted in DLT in at least 33% of participants of the same quality category. DLT was defined as >= G3 or G4 toxicity; >= G3 non-hematological toxicities directly related to study treatment (other than untreated nausea/vomiting, alopecia, G3/G4 bilirubinemia for less than 7 days due to edema of the ductus choledochus and anemia); G4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia lasting >= 7 days or G3 thrombocytopenia with complications, requiring transfusions, febrile neutropenia; stopping of oral CAP and/or ERL intake for >= 7 days, and/or cancellation of one or more BEV infusion(s) due to AEs. If MTD was not defined for a drug treatment then the maximum planned dose of that particular drug was considered as PRD for Part 2.
  • Adverse events, laboratory parameters (Part 1) [ Time Frame: At each clinic visit,for duration of study ]
  • Freedom from progression (Part 2) [ Time Frame: Event driven--monitored at 3 and 6 months ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00925769 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Part 1: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Erlotinib and Its Metabolite OSI-420 (CP373420), Capecitabine and Its Metabolites (5'-Deoxy-5-Fluorocytidine [5'-DFCR] and 5'-Deoxy-5-Fluorouridine [5'-DFUR]) [ Time Frame: CAP: 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6 hours (h) of every 2-week cycle (until Week 259) ERL: 2, 3 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24, 28, 48, 52, 72, 76, 96, 100, 120, 124, 144, 148, 168 and 172 h of every 2-week cycle (until Week 259) ]
  • Part 1: Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Erlotinib and Its Metabolite OSI-420 (CP373420), Capecitabine and Its Metabolites (5'-DFCR and 5'-DFUR) [ Time Frame: CAP: 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6 hours (h) of every 2-week cycle (until Week 259) ERL: 2, 3 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24, 28, 48, 52, 72, 76, 96, 100, 120, 124, 144, 148, 168 and 172 h of every 2-week cycle (until Week 259) ]
  • Part 1: Last Quantifiable Drug Concentration (Clast) of Erlotinib and Its Metabolite OSI-420 (CP373420), Capecitabine and Its Metabolites (5'-DFCR and 5'-DFUR) [ Time Frame: CAP: 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6 hours (h) of every 2-week cycle (until Week 259) ERL: 2, 3 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24, 28, 48, 52, 72, 76, 96, 100, 120, 124, 144, 148, 168 and 172 h of every 2-week cycle (until Week 259) ]
  • Part 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) of Erlotinib and Its Metabolite OSI-420 (CP373420), Capecitabine and Its Metabolites (5'-DFCR and 5'-DFUR) [ Time Frame: CAP: 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6 hours (h) of every 2-week cycle (until Week 259) ERL: 2, 3 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 24, 28, 48, 52, 72, 76, 96, 100, 120, 124, 144, 148, 168 and 172 h of every 2-week cycle (until Week 259) ]
  • Part 2: Percentage of Participants Free From Disease Progression [ Time Frame: Month 6 ]
    As per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version (v) 1.1, progressive disease (PD) is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions (target and non-target lesions) or the unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
  • Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Disease Control [ Time Frame: From baseline thereafter, every 6 weeks (±7 days), then 1 week after last dose (follow-up), thereafter every 6 weeks (±7 days) until disease progression (up to Week 259) ]
    A participant was defined as having controlled disease if they sustained a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) during the assessment. As per RECIST v1.1, CR is defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor marker level; PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the screening sum longest diameter; SD for target lesions is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started and SD for non-target lesions defined as persistence of 1 or more non-target lesion(s) or/and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits.
  • Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit Response [ Time Frame: One week before start of study treatment and weekly until disease progression or death (Up to Week 259) ]
    Clinical benefit response was defined as a composite of pain control, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and weight. The KPS allows participants to be classified as per their functional impairment (abnormal function). It was recorded on an 11-point scale; 0= "dead" to 100= "Normal, no complaints, no evidence of disease" and sub-divided to 3 categories; 0 to 40 = "Unable to care for self, requires institutional or hospital care or equivalent, disease may be rapidly progressing"; 50 to 70= "Unable to work, able to live at home and care for most personal needs, varying amount of assistance needed and 80 to 100= "Able to carry on normal activity; no special care is needed".
  • Part 2: Overall Survival [ Time Frame: From baseline until death (Up to Week 259) ]
    Survival was the interval of time from date of first dose of study medication to date of death at any time. Participants who had not died were censored at the date of last contact when they were known to be alive.
  • Disease control rate, clinical benefit response rate, overall survival (Part 2) [ Time Frame: Event driven--monitored at 3 and 6 months ]
  • Adverse events, laboratory parameters (Part 2) [ Time Frame: At each clinic visit,for duration of study ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
ATX Study:A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab), Tarceva (Erlotinib) and Xeloda (Capecitabine) in Patients With Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
An Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effect on Disease Progression of Triple Combination Treatment With Erlotinib (Tarceva), Bevacizumab (Avastin), and Capecitabine (Xeloda) in Patients With Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (REBECA-Trial).
This 2 part study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combination of Avastin, Tarceva and Xeloda (ATX) as second-line treatment in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic cancer. In the first part of the study, cohorts of patients will receive escalating doses of combination treatment to determine the maximum tolerated dose. The recommended dose will be used in the second part of the study to determine the efficacy of the ATX regime, in terms of its effect on disease progression. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months, and the target sample size is <100 individuals.
Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 1
Allocation: Non-Randomized
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Pancreatic Cancer
  • Drug: bevacizumab [Avastin]
    Escalating doses of 5/10mg/kg q2w
  • Drug: capecitabine [Xeloda]
    Escalating doses of 500/650/750/900mg/m2 bid
  • Drug: erlotinib [Tarceva]
    Escalating doses of 100/150mg daily
Experimental: 1
Interventions:
  • Drug: bevacizumab [Avastin]
  • Drug: capecitabine [Xeloda]
  • Drug: erlotinib [Tarceva]
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
32
36
December 2013
December 2013   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients, >=18 years of age;
  • pancreatic cancer with locally advanced and/or metastatic disease (stage IV);
  • chemonaive for metastatic or locally advanced disease;
  • ECOG performance status of 0-2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • local (stage IA to IIB)and locally advanced (stage III) pancreatic cancer;
  • previous exposure to Avastin, Tarceva or Xeloda;
  • other primary tumor within the last 5 years prior to enrollment, except for adequately treated cancer in situ of cervix, or basal cell skin cancer;
  • current or recent chronic use of aspirin (>325 mg/day) or full therapeutic dose of anticoagulants or thrombolytic agents.
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Austria
 
 
NCT00925769
ML20784
2008-004444-36
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Hoffmann-La Roche
Hoffmann-La Roche
Not Provided
Study Director: Clinical Trials Hoffmann-La Roche
Hoffmann-La Roche
July 2015

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP