Evaluation of Hemodynamic Effects of Cascade Hemofiltration in Septic Shock (Cascade)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. Identifier: NCT00922870
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : June 17, 2009
Last Update Posted : April 5, 2017
Gambro Lundia AB
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Baxter Healthcare Corporation

June 15, 2009
June 17, 2009
April 5, 2017
April 2009
March 2013   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
the primary outcome will be the number of days without catecholamines at the 28th day of randomization [ Time Frame: 28th day ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00922870 on Archive Site
rate of decrease of catecholamines during the first 72h, days without mechanical ventilation at D90, days without RRT for acute renal failure at D90, days without ICU requirement at D90, status at D90. [ Time Frame: 72h, D90 ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
Evaluation of Hemodynamic Effects of Cascade Hemofiltration in Septic Shock
Evaluation of Hemodynamic Effects of Cascade Hemofiltration in Septic Shock

Septic shock is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients. Septic Shock is associated with an overwhelming, systemic overflow of pro inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators, which leads to generalized endothelial damage, multiple organ failure, and altered cellular immunological responsiveness. Although our understanding of the complex pathophysiological alterations that occur in septic shock has increased greatly as a result of recent clinical and preclinical studies, mortality associated with the disorder remains unacceptably high, ranging from 30% to 50%. To date, attempts to improve survival with innovative, predominantly anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategies have been disappointing. A standard hemofiltration rate of 35 ml/kg/hour has been successfully used to treat acute renal failure. However, this dose does not alter plasma levels of inflammatory mediators, suggesting that its ability to clear these mediators is suboptimal. Higher doses of hemofiltration (up to 120 ml/kg per hour) have been demonstrated to improve cardiac function and hemodynamics in several animal models of sepsis. High-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) was thus conceived and applied in patients with septic shock, showing an improvements in hemodynamics with decreased vasopressor requirements and improved survival in patients admitted after a cardiac arrest.

The main benefit described with high volume hemofiltration is a hemodynamic improvement (e.g reduction in catecholamines' requirement). This improvement seems to be due to the removal of a badly defined network of middle molecular weight peptides. To remove efficiently these middle molecular peptides, a high filtration rate is needed. However, with high filtration rates, there is also a high clearance for smaller molecules, including antibiotics, electrolytes, vitamins, trace elements and amino acids.

The cascade hemofiltration system has been designed for a more efficient removal of middle molecular weight peptides with a limited solute consumption.

The goal of this study is the evaluation of the hemodynamic improvement using cascade hemofiltration in patients treated for septic shock.

Not Provided
Not Applicable
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Device: Cascade
    Cascade treatment over 48h
  • Other: Standard treatment
    Standard therapy
  • Active Comparator: Standard treatment
    Intervention: Other: Standard treatment
  • Experimental: Cascade
    Intervention: Device: Cascade
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
Same as current
March 2013
March 2013   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a septic shock diagnosed by the medical staff team.
  • Patient mechanically ventilated and treated by high doses of catecholamines after adequate fluid administration (≥ 1.0 mg/h of norepinephrine or epinephrine) for ≥ 120 minutes and < 24h.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age (years) < 18 or > 85.
  • Weight >120 kg
  • Thrombocytopenia 50< G/l or Neutrophils <0.5 Giga/l
  • Contra indication to heparin anticoagulation.
  • Patient requiring catecholamines (epinephrine ≥ 1 mg/h or norepinephrine ≥ 1 mg/h) for >24h.
  • Patient admitted to the ICU ≥ 7 days before the inclusion criteria.
  • Comorbid conditions with an expected survival < 6 months
  • Inclusion (<28 days) in another study interfering with the goals of the current investigation.
  • Pregnancy
  • Immune compromised patients (e.g. being treated for cancer, treated by immunosuppressors or steroids, AIDS).
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years to 85 Years   (Adult, Senior)
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Not Provided
Not Provided
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Gambro Lundia AB
Study Chair: Monchi Mehran, Dr Unaffiliate
Baxter Healthcare Corporation
April 2017

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP