We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Electrical Stimulation for Recovery of Hand Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00891319
First Posted: May 1, 2009
Last Update Posted: November 6, 2017
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Collaborators:
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Case Western Reserve University
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Jayme Knutson, MetroHealth Medical Center
September 25, 2008
May 1, 2009
September 8, 2017
November 6, 2017
November 6, 2017
January 2009
May 2015   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Change in Box and Block Test Score at 6 Mo Post-Treatment [ Time Frame: 2 timepoints: Prior to treatment, and 6 months after completion of treatment. ]

The Box and Blocks test counts how many times the participant can pick up 1 block at t time, move it over a partition, and release it in a target area within 60 seconds.

The minimum score is 0. There is no maximum score. The average score of healthy individuals within the age range of this study ranges from 70 to 79.

Higher scores are considered to be a better outcome. For each individual, the score prior to treatment was subtracted from the score at 6 months after completion of treatment. Then for each treatment group, these change scores were averaged.

Box and Block Test [ Time Frame: 8 times: Prior to treatment, every 3 weeks during treatment, at the end of treatment, and at 2, 4, and 6 months after completion of treatment. ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00891319 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Change in Arm Motor Abilities Test Score at 6-Month Post-Treatment [ Time Frame: 2 timepoints: Prior to treatment, and 6 months after completion of treatment. ]

    The Arm Motor Abilities Test assesses the participant's ability to execute specific upper limb tasks and does not allow for compensation with the unimpaired side. The test consists of 9 compound tasks composed of 1 to 3 component tasks, each of which is rated on a 0 - 5 ordinal scale: 0, no attempt to use affected limb; 1, attempt to use affected limb but it does not participate functionally; 2, affected limb is used only as a helper or stabilizer; 3, affected limb is used slowly or within synergy patterns; 4, almost normal use of affected limb; 5, normal use. The final score is the average of all component task scores across all 9 compound tasks.

    The minimum score is 0; maximum score is 5. Higher scores are considered to be a better outcome. For each individual, the score prior to treatment was subtracted from the score at 6 months after completion of treatment. Then for each treatment group, these change scores were averaged.

  • Change in Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Score at 6-Months Post-Treatment [ Time Frame: 2 timepoints: Prior to treatment, and 6 months after completion of treatment. ]

    The Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) Assessment is a measure of upper limb motor impairment. Participants are asked to attempt to perform a list of very specific movements of the arm, elbow, forearm, wrist, and hand that take into account synergy patterns, isolated strength, coordination, and hypertonia. Each movement attempt is graded on a 3-point ordinal scale (0, cannot perform; 1, perform partially; and 2, perform fully) and these subscores are summed to provide a maximum score of 66, minimum score of 0.

    Higher scores are considered to be a better outcome. For each individual, the score prior to treatment was subtracted from the score at 6 months after completion of treatment. Then for each treatment group, these change scores were averaged.

  • Arm Motor Abilities Test [ Time Frame: 8 times: Prior to treatment, every 3 weeks during treatment, at the end of treatment, and at 2, 4, and 6 months after completion of treatment. ]
  • Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (upper limb motor impairment component) [ Time Frame: 8 times: Prior to treatment, every 3 weeks during treatment, at the end of treatment, and at 2, 4, and 6 months after completion of treatment. ]
  • Active range of finger extension [ Time Frame: 8 times: Prior to treatment, every 3 weeks during treatment, at the end of treatment, and at 2, 4, and 6 months after completion of treatment. ]
  • Finger extension tracking accuracy [ Time Frame: 8 times: Prior to treatment, every 3 weeks during treatment, at the end of treatment, and at 2, 4, and 6 months after completion of treatment. ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Electrical Stimulation for Recovery of Hand Function in Chronic Stroke Survivors
Contralaterally Controlled FES for Chronic Arm/Hand Hemiplegia: Single-Site RCT
Impaired hand function is one of the most frequently persisting consequences of stroke. The purpose of this study is to compare two different treatments -- Contralataterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation (CCFES) and Cyclic Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (cNMES) -- for improved recovery of hand function after stroke.

Hemiparesis of the upper limb is one of the most serious and most common impairments resulting from stroke. Approximately 75% of the over 750,000 strokes that occur annually in the United States cause some degree of upper extremity paralysis. Approximately 65% of stroke survivors still cannot use their affected hand to assist with activities of daily living 6 months after their stroke. The impact of upper extremity impairments on disability and health is great, yet there are relatively few rehabilitation interventions designed to restore function to the impaired upper limb. Therefore, our long-term objective is to develop upper extremity rehabilitation therapies that are effective at restoring arm and hand function, that are applicable across a wide range of impairment severity, and that are readily implemented in the present healthcare environment.

The purpose of this study is to estimate the efficacy of Contralataterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation (CCFES) in reducing upper extremity impairment and activity limitation in chronic upper extremity hemiplegia. CCFES is a rehabilitation intervention in which neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is applied to the finger and thumb extensor muscles of the paretic upper limb to open the hand. The stroke survivor controls the stimulation intensity, and consequent degree of hand opening, by modulating the degree of opening of the contralateral unimpaired hand, which is detected by an instrumented glove. Thus, volitional opening of the unaffected hand produces stimulated opening of the affected hand. The stimulation paradigm is used to assist the stroke survivor in practicing functional tasks with their affected hand. We will conduct a randomized controlled trial in which chronic stroke survivors (>6 months post-stroke) will be randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of CCFES or cyclic NMES, an intervention that provides electrical stimulation of the hand extensors, but with preprogrammed timing and intensity. Randomization will be stratified on two levels of baseline hand impairment defined by the degree of voluntary finger extension present. Assessments of upper extremity impairment and activity limitation will be made every 3 weeks during the treatment period and every 2 months during a 6-month follow-up period.

This study is the first randomized controlled trial of CCFES in chronic upper extremity hemiplegia. Ultimately, the information learned in this study will serve to accelerate the development of treatments for reducing post-stroke disability.

Interventional
Not Provided
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Stroke
  • Hemiparesis
  • Hemiplegia
Device: Electrical stimulator

• 12-week intervention

  1. Therapist-guided task practice performed twice a week in the research laboratory. (Device used for CCFES group but not for cNMES group during these sessions.)
  2. Self-administered CCFES or cNMES-mediated hand opening exercise performed 10 sessions per week at home.
  • Experimental: CCFES

    CCFES - Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation

    • Electrical stimulator
    • Stimulation to finger and thumb extensors only in response to, and with an intensity proportional to, opening of the contralateral unimpaired hand.
    • A glove instrumented with sensors and worn on the unimpaired hand detects the degree of hand opening and determines stimulation intensity.
    • Therapy sessions are done with the subject being assisted by the CCFES system.
    Intervention: Device: Electrical stimulator
  • Active Comparator: cNMES

    cNMES - Cyclic NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation

    • Electrical stimulator
    • Preprogrammed cycles of finger and thumb extensor stimulation repeatedly and automatically open the hand.
    • Subject instructed to not move the contralateral arm/hand during stimulation.
    • Therapy sessions are done without the stimulation system.
    Intervention: Device: Electrical stimulator

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
80
May 2015
May 2015   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-80
  • > 6 months of first hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic stroke
  • Able to recall 2 of 3 items after 30 minutes
  • MRC ≤ 4 for finger extensors on paretic side
  • Able to follow 3-stage commands
  • Functional movement of shoulder and elbow (e.g., can reach ¾ hand-to- mouth movement) of paretic side
  • Caregiver available to assist with device and compliance if needed
  • Skin intact on hemiparetic arm
  • Medically stable
  • Surface NMES trial opens hand without pain
  • Full volitional hand opening/closing of contralateral hand
  • Upper extremity hand section of FMA < 11/14
  • Able to hear and respond to stimulator/cue box auditory cues
  • Completed occupational therapy (no concomitant OT)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of functional PROM of the wrist or fingers of affected side
  • Severe shoulder or hand pain (unable to position hand in the workspace without pain)
  • Uncontrolled seizure disorder
  • Insensate forearm and/or hand
  • Uncompensated hemi-neglect (extinguishing to double simultaneous stimulation)
  • Edema of the affected forearm and/or hand
  • History of cardiac arrhythmias with hemodynamic instability
  • Cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electronic system
  • Pregnant
  • IM Botox injections in any UE muscle in the last 3 months
  • Parkinson's disease, SCI, TBI, or MS
  • Ipsilateral motor neuron lesion
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years to 80 Years   (Adult, Senior)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
United States
 
 
NCT00891319
R01HD059814( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )
R01HD059814 ( U.S. NIH Grant/Contract )
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Plan to Share IPD: No
Jayme Knutson, MetroHealth Medical Center
MetroHealth Medical Center
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
  • Case Western Reserve University
Principal Investigator: Jayme S. Knutson, PhD Case Western Reserve University
MetroHealth Medical Center
October 2017

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP