Discharge ALERT: Quality Improvement Initiative (Discharge)
|ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00853463|
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : March 2, 2009
Last Update Posted : June 1, 2011
|First Submitted Date ICMJE||February 26, 2009|
|First Posted Date ICMJE||March 2, 2009|
|Last Update Posted Date||June 1, 2011|
|Start Date ICMJE||April 2009|
|Primary Completion Date||March 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Current Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE
||Clinically diagnosed DVT and/or PE [ Time Frame: 90 days after discharge ]|
|Original Primary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Same as current|
|Change History||Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00853463 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site|
|Current Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE
|Original Secondary Outcome Measures ICMJE||Same as current|
|Current Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Original Other Outcome Measures ICMJE||Not Provided|
|Brief Title ICMJE||Discharge ALERT: Quality Improvement Initiative|
|Official Title ICMJE||Multi-centered Discharge Alert to Prevent DVT and PE at Hospital Discharge|
|Brief Summary||Brigham and Women's Hospital will coordinate a Quality Improvement Initiative at other hospitals that focuses on whether physician notification prior to discharge of high risk VTE patients will reduce the incidence of VTE after hospital discharge.|
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND RATIONALE FOR THE STUDY
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is often avoidable in hospitalized patients because proven prevention strategies have been established for patients at risk (1). North American and European prophylaxis guidelines have been widely disseminated. However, despite focus on strategies for the prevention of VTE in hospitalized patients at the time of admission to the hospital, there has been little focus on prevention of VTE at the time of discharge from the hospital (2,3).
At Brigham and Women's Hospital, we undertook a previous Quality Improvement Initiative (BWH protocol # 2000P000328) aimed at increasing the frequency of VTE prophylaxis in high risk patients. This novel strategy required: 1) devising a risk score that reliably and quickly identified patients at high risk of VTE, and 2) randomizing high-risk patients without prophylaxis into an intervention group or control group. The intervention group's physicians received a single electronic, computerized alert explaining that the patient was at high risk, was not receiving prophylaxis, and suggesting that prophylaxis be ordered from a template of available pharmacological and mechanical options. In contrast, the control group's physicians received no alert (4).
Each of 8 common risk factors was weighted according to a point scale. To be labeled as "high-risk" for VTE, the point score must equal or exceed 4 points.
There were 2,506 patients in the Quality Improvement Initiative: 1,255 in the intervention group and 1,251 in the control group. The incidence of symptomatic VTE at 90 days was high: 8.2% in the control group and 4.9% in the intervention group (4).
Currently, an investigator initiated Quality Improvement Initiative (BWH protocol # 2005-P-002527) of human alerts rather than electronic, computerized alerts, has been undertaken in high risk patients not receiving prophylaxis. Enrollment of 2,500 patients at 25 centers located throughout the United States was completed in November 2007 with a follow-up rate that exceeded 99%. Analysis of the data is currently being conducted.
Limited research focus has been placed on high-risk VTE subjects in the community, outside of the hospital setting. Since most VTE prophylaxis has focused upon protection of high-risk patients at the time of hospital admission, there is a need to focus on VTE prophylaxis within 48 hours of hospital discharge. It is clear that as preparations are being made for hospital discharge, many patients remain at high risk for DVT and acute pulmonary embolism. After discharge, some patients will have an even higher risk than during hospitalization because of prolonged immobilization and bed rest at home (5).
The Discharge Alert Quality Improvement Initiative will determine whether alerting physicians about the importance of continued VTE prophylaxis just prior to the time of planned hospital discharge will lower the incidence of outpatient VTE. This new strategy is unproven and might not be effective, but this Quality Improvement Initiative should provide a definitive answer.
We will also implement as part of our Discharge Alert Trial an in-hospital Quality Improvement Initiative of intensive patient education at Brigham and Women's Hospital to improve patient adherence to physician-ordered pharmacological venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. We hypothesize that after implementation of this education program, fewer patients will decline physician-ordered doses of enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin (UFH) compared with a recent cohort of patients at risk for VTE who did not receive specialized education about VTE.
Identification of Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Hospitalized patients awaiting planned discharge within 48 hours will be evaluated with a previously validated (BWH protocol # 2000P000328) VTE risk profile. The VTE risk profile will be computed for each patient awaiting discharge using 8 common risk factors. Each risk factor is weighted according to a point score. To be labeled as "high risk" for VTE, the point score must equal or exceed 4 points.
Minor (Low) Risk Factors (1 POINT each):
Intermediate Risk Factor (2 POINTS each):
Major (High) Risk Factors (3 POINTS each):
Screening for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
If the cumulative VTE risk score is at least 4, orders are reviewed to detect ongoing mechanical or pharmacological prophylactic measures. Mechanical prophylactic measures include graduated compression stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression devices. Pharmacological prophylactic measures include unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, dalteparin, fondaparinux, tinzaparin, and warfarin.
At Brigham and Women's Hospital, we will also identify all new orders for pharmacological VTE prophylaxis with enoxaparin and UFH using the BWH computerized order entry system as part of an additional component of the Quality Improvement Initiative. For this component of the Quality Improvement Initiative, eligibility is defined as having a DVT Risk Score of 3 or higher and having electronically entered physician's orders for appropriate pharmacologic VTE thromboprophylaxis.
Quality Improvement Intervention
The intervention will take place within 48 hours of planned hospital discharge. If randomized to the alert, the responsible physician will be notified that: 1) his or her patient is at high risk for VTE, and 2) VTE prophylaxis should be considered in the Discharge orders. If randomized to no alert (control patients), the responsible physician will not be contacted.
At Brigham and Women's Hospital, we will also provide 500 eligible patients in a prospective cohort with one-on-one education using a scripted dialog to describe the rationale and importance of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis.
Prophylaxis Guidelines at Discharge
"Consider Venous Thromboembolism prophylaxis at the time of hospital discharge in patients with congestive heart failure or respiratory disease or prolonged immobility."
"For those without contraindication, consider pharmacological prophylaxis with low-molecular weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, or fondaparinux."
"For those at high risk of bleeding, consider mechanical prophylaxis with intermittent pneumatic compression devices or graduated compression stockings."
A 90-day follow-up will be performed for all study patients. If patient outcomes cannot be determined by medical record review alone, then study representatives may contact the subject's Primary Care Physician (PCP) for necessary information. IRB approval must be obtained at each participating hospital prior to any contact with subjects' PCPs.
Data Collection and Study Endpoints
The primary endpoint is clinically diagnosed DVT or PE at 90 days. Safety endpoints include total mortality and hemorrhagic events at 90 and 30 days, respectively. These are the same endpoints utilized in our prior Quality Improvement Initiative (BWH protocol # 2000P000328).
Hemorrhagic events will be classified according to the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) trial criteria. Bleeding events will be classified as severe or life-threatening if they are intracerebral or if they result in substantial hemodynamic compromise requiring treatment. Moderate bleeding is defined by the need for transfusion. Minor events refer to bleeding not requiring transfusion or causing hemodynamic compromise. We will report rates of "major bleeding" which will be defined as GUSTO severe/life-threatening or moderate bleeding.
For the additional component of the Quality Improvement Initiative at Brigham and Women's Hospital, we will also assess improvement of medication adherence with enoxaparin and UFH following an intensive and individualized patient education program compared with our recently completed cohort study in which no uniform education program was targeted at VTE prophylaxis.
The initial sample size (power 80%, two-sided alpha 5%) has been calculated at 2,500 patients based on an estimated 7% rate of the primary end point in the control group, and an odds ratio of 0.59 for the primary endpoint in intervention group patients. This yields a sample size requirement of 2,138 patients, plus an estimated 362 patients who will withdraw from the study.
We will use Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for comparisons in the distributions of continuous variables between groups, and chi-square tests or Fisher's exact test for comparisons of categorical variables. The primary analysis is the difference in the Kaplan-Meier estimator for freedom from VTE at day 90 between intervention and control patients. The log-rank test will estimate the cumulative probability of the primary endpoint in the intervention and control groups. We will use the proportional-hazards model for estimation of the relative hazard of clinical endpoints associated with the physician alert. All p-values reported are two-sided.
|Study Type ICMJE||Interventional|
|Study Phase||Not Provided|
|Study Design ICMJE||Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
|Intervention ICMJE||Behavioral: Alert
The responsible physician will be notified that: 1) his or her patient is at high risk for VTE and 2) VTE prophylaxis should be considered in the Discharge orders
Other Name: "Alert"
* Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
|Recruitment Status ICMJE||Completed|
|Completion Date||May 2011|
|Primary Completion Date||March 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
|Eligibility Criteria ICMJE||
|Ages||18 Years and older (Adult, Senior)|
|Accepts Healthy Volunteers||No|
|Contacts ICMJE||Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects|
|Listed Location Countries ICMJE||United States|
|Removed Location Countries|
|NCT Number ICMJE||NCT00853463|
|Other Study ID Numbers ICMJE||2008-P-001083|
|Has Data Monitoring Committee||No|
|U.S. FDA-regulated Product||Not Provided|
|IPD Sharing Statement||Not Provided|
|Responsible Party||Samuel Goldhaber, MD, Brigham and Women's Hospital|
|Study Sponsor ICMJE||Brigham and Women's Hospital|
|PRS Account||Brigham and Women's Hospital|
|Verification Date||May 2011|
ICMJE Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP