We updated the design of this site on December 18, 2017. Learn more.
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Efficacy and Safety Study of GSK679586 in Patients With Severe Asthma

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00843193
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : February 13, 2009
Results First Posted : December 12, 2017
Last Update Posted : December 12, 2017
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):

February 5, 2009
February 13, 2009
September 26, 2017
December 12, 2017
December 12, 2017
December 9, 2008
July 25, 2010   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) Over 12 Weeks [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12 ]
The ACQ-7 consists of 7 questions scored between zero (no impairment/ limitation) to 6 (total impairment/ limitation). The values of Week 1 is considered as Baseline. ACQ-7 was calculated as the average of the 7 scores. If any one individual score was missing, the ACQ-7 was set to missing.The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. If either the Baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from Baseline was set to missing as well.
To evaluate the efficacy of repeat intravenous dose administration of GSK679586 in patients with severe asthma by assessing the changes from baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ7) [ Time Frame: Over 12 weeks ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00843193 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Change From Baseline in ACQ-7 Over 16 Weeks and 24 Weeks [ Time Frame: Week 16 and Week 24 ]
    The ACQ-7 is a 7-item questionnaire that provides a measure of a participant's asthma control. Participant responses were recorded on a 7-point scale ranging from zero (no impairment/ limitation) to 6 (total impairment/ limitation). The values of Week 1 is considered as Baseline. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. If either the Baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from Baseline was set to missing as well. Change from Baseline of Week 16 and Week 24 are incorporated here which are Follow up weeks.
  • Number of Participants Who Demonstrated a Clinically Meaningful Change in ACQ-7 Over the 12 Weeks Assessment Period. [ Time Frame: Upto 12 weeks ]
    The ACQ-7 is a 7-item questionnaire that provides a measure of a participant's asthma control. Participant responses were recorded on a 7-point scale ranging from zero (no impairment/ limitation) to 6 (total impairment/ limitation). The percentage of participants who were classified as responders for ACQ-7, defined as a clinically meaningful decrease from baseline in ACQ-7 of at least 0.50, was generally similar between treatment groups at each visit and over the 12-week treatment period.
  • Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1) Over 12 Weeks. [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12 ]
    FEV1 is forced expiratory volume in 1 second.Change from Baseline FEV1 was calculated for each of the following visit: Visit 6, Visit 7, Visit 9 and Visit 11. A binary variable was created for each participant with 1 for the responder and 0 for the non nonresponder at each visit. Week 1 was considered as the Baseline. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. If either the Baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from Baseline was set to missing as well.
  • Change From Baseline in FEV1 Over 16 Weeks and 24 Weeks [ Time Frame: Week 16 and 24 ]
    FEV1 is forced expiratory volume in 1 second.Change from Baseline FEV1 was calculated for each of the following visit: Visit 6, Visit 7, Visit 9 and Visit 11. A binary variable was created for each participant with 1 for the responder and 0 for the non nonresponder at each visit. Week 1 was considered as the Baseline. The change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. If either the Baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from Baseline was set to missing as well. Change from Baseline of Week 16 and Week 24 are incorporated here which are Follow up weeks.
  • Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated a Clinically Meaningful Increase in FEV1 Over the 12 Week Assessment Period [ Time Frame: Upto 12 weeks ]
    FEV1 is forced expiratory volume in 1 second.A participant is defined as a FEV1 responder if he/she achieves a change from baseline FEV1 of >=200ml. To evaluate whether the participant was a responder over 12 weeks, change from baseline FEV1 over 12 weeks was calculated by taking the mean of the changes at Visit 7, Visit 9 and Visit 11. A binary variable was created for each participant with 1 for the responder and 0 for the non-responder. If either Visit 9 or Visit 11 FEV1 data are missing, then the binary variable for the responder over 12 weeks was set to be missing. If Visit 7 data were missing, but Visit 9 and Visit 11 data were available, then the binary variable for the responder over 12 weeks was still calculated.
  • Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [ Time Frame: Up to Week 25 ]
    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
  • Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Importance: Systolic and Distolic Blood Pressure and Heart Rate. [ Time Frame: Screening, Day -28, 1, 15, 29, 50, 57 and 169 (follow-up 3) ]
    Vital signs including systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate taken at certain visits from screening to follow-up. Potential Clinical Importance Ranges were systolic blood pressure (<85 and >160millimeter of mercury [mmHg]), diastolic blood pressure (<45 and >100 mmHg) and heart rate (<40 and >110 beats per minute [BPM]). Number of participants with abnormal systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate values of potential clinical importance were summarized.
  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormality in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) [ Time Frame: Upto Week 25 ]
    Single 12-lead ECGs were obtained at certain visits from screening to follow-up. ECG machine that automatically calculates the heart rate and measures PR, QRS, QT, and Corrected QT (QTc) intervals. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormality in 12-lead ECG readings were summarized.
  • Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematological Parameters of Potential Clinical Importance [ Time Frame: Upto Week 25 ]
    Blood samples were collected on each visit from Week 1 to Week 25 to assess the haematological parameters. White Blood Cells count, Neutrophils, Haemoglobin, Hematocrit, Count and Lymphocytes were analyzed in haematology. Number of participants with any abnormal hematological parameters of potential clinical importance are summarized here.
  • Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Chemistry Parameters of Potential Clinical Importance [ Time Frame: Upto Week 25 ]
    Blood samples were collected on each visit from Week 1 to Week 25 to assess the clinical chemistry parameters. Albumin, Calcium, Glucose, Pottasium, Sodium and Total Carbon Di-oxide were analyzed in clinical chemistry. Number of participants with any abnormal clinical chemistry parameters of potential clinical importance are summarized here.
  • Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinanalysis Parameters of Potential Clinical Importance [ Time Frame: Upto Week 25 ]
    Samples were collected on each visit from Week 1 to Week 25 for urinalysis. Number of participants with any abnormal urinalysis parameters of potential clinical importance are summarized here.
  • Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC (0-τ)). [ Time Frame: Day 1 (Pre-dose, 0.25h, 1.00h), Day 4 (72h), Day 29 (672h), Day 57 (1344h), Day 61 (1440h), Day 85 (2016h), Day 141 (3360h), Day 169 (4032h) and Follow up visits. ]
    Plasma concentration-time data were well described by a 2-compartment model with first order elimination. Plasma concentrations of GSK679586 were determined at Day 1 (Pre-dose, 0.25h, 1.00h), Day 4 (72h), Day 29 (672 h), Day 57 (1344h), Day 61 (1440h), Day 85 (2016h), Day 141 (3360h), Day 169 (4032h) and Follow up visits. However, the derived PK parameters were determined only for the day of infusion administration. i.e. Day 1, Day 29 and Day 57. The AUC at Day 1 indicates AUC(0-1 h), Day 29 indicated AUC(0-672 h) and Day 57 indicated AUC(0-1344h). AUC(0-τ) for each participant was reconstructed from sparse PK sampling using Bayesian prediction obtained from a population PK model using nonlinear mixed effects methods (NONMEM, version V).
  • PK Parameter:Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) [ Time Frame: Day 1 (Pre-dose, 0.25h, 1.00h), Day 4 (72h), Day 29 (672 h), Day 57 (1344h), Day 61 (1440h), Day 85 (2016h), Day 141 (3360h), Day 169 (4032h) and Follow up visits. ]
    Plasma concentration-time data were well described by a 2-compartment model with first order elimination. Plasma concentrations of GSK679586 were determined at Day 1 (Pre-dose, 0.25h, 1.00h), Day 4 (72h), Day 29 (672h), Day 57 (1344h), Day 61 (1440h), Day 85 (2016h), Day 141 (3360h), Day 169 (4032h) and Follow up visits. However, Cmax were determined only for the day of infusion administration. i.e. Day 1, Day 29 and Day 57. The Cmax at Day 1 indicates Cmax(0-1 h), Day 29 indicated Cmax(0-672 h) and Day 57 indicated Cmax(0-1344 h). Cmax for each participant was reconstructed from sparse PK sampling using Bayesian prediction obtained from a population PK model using nonlinear mixed effects methods (NONMEM, version V).
  • PK Parameter: Systemic Clearance of Parent Drug [ Time Frame: Day 1 (Pre-dose, 0.25h, 1.00h), Day 4 (72h), Day 29 (672 h), Day 57 (1344h), Day 61 (1440h), Day 85 (2016h), Day 141 (3360h), Day 169 (4032h) and Follow up visits. ]
    Plasma concentration-time data were well described by a 2-compartment model with first order elimination. Plasma concentrations of GSK679586 were determined at Day 1 (Pre-dose, 0.25h, 1.00h), Day 4 (72h), Day 29 (672h), Day 57 (1344h), Day 61 (1440h), Day 85 (2016h), Day 141 (3360h), Day 169 (4032h) and Follow up visits. However, systemic clearance were determined only for the day of infusion administration. i.e. Day 1, Day 29 and Day 57. The systemic clearance at Day 1 indicates systemic clearance(0-1 h), Day 29 indicated systemic clearance(0-672 h) and Day 57 indicated systemic clearance(0-1344 h). Systemic clearance of parent drug for each participant was reconstructed from sparse PK sampling using Bayesian prediction obtained from a population PK model using nonlinear mixed effects methods (NONMEM, version V).
  • PK Parameter: Volume of Distribution [ Time Frame: Day 1 (Pre-dose, 0.25h, 1.00h), Day 4 (72h), Day 29 (672 h), Day 57 (1344h), Day 61 (1440h), Day 85 (2016h), Day 141 (3360h), Day 169 (4032h) and Follow up visits. ]
    Plasma concentration-time data were well described by a 2-compartment model with first order elimination. Plasma concentrations of GSK679586 were determined at Day 1 (Pre-dose, 0.25h, 1.00h), Day 4 (72h), Day 29 (672 h), Day 57 (1344h), Day 61 (1440h), Day 85 (2016h), Day 141 (3360h), Day 169 (4032h) and Follow up visits. However, volume of distribution were determined only for the day of infusion administration. i.e. Day 1, Day 29 and Day 57. The volume of distribution at Day 1 indicates volume of distribution(0-1 h), Day 29 indicated volume of distribution (0-672 h) and Day 57 indicated volume of distribution (0-1344 h). Volume of distribution for each participant was reconstructed from sparse PK sampling using Bayesian prediction obtained from a population PK model using nonlinear mixed effects methods (NONMEM, version V). The 2-compartment model provided the data for volume of distribution of central compartment (V1) and volume distribution of peripheral compartment (V2).
  • Number of Participants With Confirmed Positive Anti-GSK679586 Antibody Results After Initiation of Study Treatment [ Time Frame: Up to Week 25 ]
    Serum samples were tested for presence of anti-GSK679586 antibodies. Blood samples were collected via an indwelling cannula or by direct venepuncture collected into a serum separator tube and allowed to clot for 1 to 2 hours. Samples were centrifuged and the resultant serum was transferred to 3 separate cryovials and stored at -80°C until shipped on dry ice to the central laboratory. Samples were analyzed in a tiered assay format. Number of participants with confirmed positive Anti-GSK679586 antibody results after initiation of study treatment were reported.
  • To evaluate the effect of GSK679586 with respect to FEV1 and ACQ-7 for other designated efficacy windows by assessing the changes from baseline in FEV1 and ACQ-7 [ Time Frame: Over 12, 16 and 24 weeks ]
  • To evaluate the safety & tolerability of repeat intravenous dose administration of GSK679586 in patients with severe asthma by measuring adverse events, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and clinical safety laboratory parameters [ Time Frame: Approximately 37 weeks ]
  • To evaluate the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of repeat intravenous doses of GSK679586 in patients with severe asthma by measuring plasma PK parameters of GSK679586 including: AUC(0-tau), Cmax, CL and.V [ Time Frame: Approximately 37 weeks ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Efficacy and Safety Study of GSK679586 in Patients With Severe Asthma
A Multi-Centre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Repeat-Dose Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous GSK679586 in Patients With Severe Asthma
Treatment, Randomised, Double Blind, Parallel Assignment, Safety/efficacy Study
A Multi-Centre, Multi-country, Randomized, Double-Blind (Subject, Investigator), Placebo-Controlled, Repeat-Dose study to evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous GSK679586 in Patients with Severe Asthma
Interventional
Phase 2
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Asthma
  • Drug: INTRAVENOUS GSK679586
    GSK679586 will be provided as a clear or colorless to pale yellow liquid with the unit dose strength of 10mg/kg and will be infused over an hour. The infusion will be delivered by a programmable infusion pump
  • Drug: INTRAVENOUS PLACEBO
    Clear or colorless 0.9% sodium chloride saline solution will be infused over an hour. The infusion will be delivered by a programmable infusion pump
  • Drug: FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE
    Subjects will be supplied fluticasone propionate at Screening, Run-in and when needed during the study. Subjects will be up-titrated to 1000 μg/day and those who were already taking greater than equal to 1000 μg/day fluticasone propionate or equivalent prior to the study will remain on their pre-study dose.
  • Experimental: GSK679586
    Subjects will receive three, once monthly intravenous administration of 10 mg/kg of GSK679586, according to randomization
    Interventions:
    • Drug: INTRAVENOUS GSK679586
    • Drug: FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE
  • Placebo Comparator: PLACEBO
    Subjects will receive three, once monthly intravenous administration of saline, according to randomization
    Interventions:
    • Drug: INTRAVENOUS PLACEBO
    • Drug: FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE
Anderson WH, Koshy BT, Huang L, Mosteller M, Stinnett SW, Condreay LD, Ortega H. Genetic analysis of asthma exacerbations. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Jun;110(6):416-422.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.04.002.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
198
July 25, 2010
July 25, 2010   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • history of asthma for ≥ 6 months
  • taking inhaled corticosteroids
  • non-smoking
  • Baseline (pre-bronchodilator) FEV1 35-80% predicted at screening.
  • Reversible airways disease as indicated by an increase of FEV1 ≥12% from baseline after nebulised salbutamol or albuterol.
  • symptomatic according to the ACQ-7

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable severe asthma
  • Recent respiratory illness
  • Presence of other respiratory disease or chronic pulmonary condition other than asthma
  • Treatment with omalizumab within 4 months of study
  • Recent gastrointestinal or respiratory parasitic infestation
  • History of severe allergy to food or drugs

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years to 75 Years   (Adult, Senior)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
France,   Germany,   Netherlands,   Norway,   Poland,   South Africa,   United Kingdom,   United States
 
 
NCT00843193
106870
No
Not Provided
Plan to Share IPD: Yes
Plan Description: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
URL: http://
GlaxoSmithKline
GlaxoSmithKline
Not Provided
Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials GlaxoSmithKline
GlaxoSmithKline
November 2017

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP