ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Long Term Study Of Pregabalin In Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome Patients (RLS)

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00806026
Recruitment Status : Completed
First Posted : December 10, 2008
Results First Posted : September 27, 2012
Last Update Posted : September 27, 2012
Sponsor:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Pfizer

December 9, 2008
December 10, 2008
May 7, 2012
September 27, 2012
September 27, 2012
December 2008
May 2011   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Symptom Severity [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
    International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) is psychometrically and clinically valid and reliable clinician-administered instrument used to assess the severity of RLS. It assesses RLS symptom severity and impact on daily living and is comprised of 10 items, scored on 0 to 4 scale, where lower score indicates lower symptom severity/impact on living. Two subscale scores are symptom severity (6 items) ranging from 0-24 (lower score indicates lower symptom severity) and impact on daily living (3 items) ranging from 0-12 (lower score indicates lower impact on living). Item 3 is unrelated to the other items. The global score is calculated from all 10 items, range from 0 to 40, where lower scores reflect lower severity and better quality of life.
  • Change From Baseline in the RLS Symptom Severity at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ]
    IRLS is psychometrically and clinically valid and reliable clinician-administered instrument used to assess the severity of RLS. It assesses RLS symptom severity and impact on daily living and is comprised of 10 items, scored on 0 to 4 scale, where lower score indicates lower symptom severity/impact on living. Two subscale scores are symptom severity (6 items) ranging from 0-24 (lower score indicates lower symptom severity) and impact on daily living (3 items) ranging from 0-12 (lower score indicates lower impact on living). Item 3 is unrelated to the other items. The global score is calculated from all 10 items, range from 0 to 40, where lower scores reflect lower severity and better quality of life.
  • Percentage of Participants Responding to Treatment at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected. Responders were defined as participants who report CGI-I score of "very much improved" or "much improved".
  • Percentage of Participants With Augmentation [ Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 52 ]
    Augmentation was worsening of RLS symptoms, attributable to a specific long-term therapeutic intervention for RLS. Percentage of participants with augmentation was evaluated by centralized evaluation board using a set of assessment criteria for potential augmentation which included structured interview for diagnosis of augmentation during RLS treatment (SIDA-RLS), augmentation severity rating scale (ASRS), clinical judgment. ASRS measures severity of augmentation and consist of three items to be completed by clinician. Clinician would score participants' answers by comparing post-baseline evaluations to those at baseline. ASRS total score range: 0-24, with higher score indicating more severe augmentation.
  • RLS symptom severity using International RLS Severity Scale (IRLS) [ Time Frame: up to 12 months ]
  • Proportion of subjects responding to treatment using Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) [ Time Frame: up to 12 months ]
  • Rate of augmentation [ Time Frame: up to 12 months ]
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00806026 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Subjective Waking After Sleep Onset (WASO) [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
    SSQ: Participant-rated instrument used to assess previous night's sleep profile. It is used to measure sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency (1 item), hours of sleep (1 item), number of awakenings (1 item), total WASO (1 item), quality of sleep (1 item). WASO is time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. Total WASO subscale (in minutes): numerical rating completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Total WASO subscale score ranges from 0-1440 minutes. Lower value indicates better sleep.
  • Change From Baseline in SSQ: Subjective WASO at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ]
    SSQ: Participant-rated instrument used to assess previous night's sleep profile. It is used to measure sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency (1 item), hours of sleep (1 item), number of awakenings (1 item), total WASO (1 item), quality of sleep (1 item). WASO is time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. Total WASO subscale (in minutes): numerical rating completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Total WASO subscale score ranges from 0-1440 minutes. Lower value indicates better sleep.
  • Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Latency Subscale Score at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    SSQ: Participant-rated instrument used to assess previous night's sleep profile. It is used to measure sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency (1 item), hours of sleep (1 item), number of awakenings (1 item), total WASO (1 item), quality of sleep (1 item). Latency subscale (in minutes): numerical rating completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Latency subscale score ranges from 0-840 minutes. Lower value indicates better sleep.
  • Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Hours of Sleep Subscale Score at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    SSQ: Participant-rated instrument used to assess previous night's sleep profile. It is used to measure sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency (1 item), hours of sleep (1 item), number of awakenings (1 item), total WASO (1 item), quality of sleep (1 item). Hours of sleep subscale: numerical rating completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Hours of sleep subscale score ranges from 0-16 hours. Higher value indicates better sleep.
  • Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Number of Awakenings Subscale Score at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    SSQ: Participant-rated instrument used to assess previous night's sleep profile. It is used to measure sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency (1 item), hours of sleep (1 item), number of awakenings (1 item), total WASO (1 item), quality of sleep (1 item). Number of awakenings subscale: numerical rating completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Number of awakenings subscale score ranges from 0-30. Lower value indicates better sleep.
  • Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Quality of Sleep Subscale Score at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    SSQ: Participant-rated instrument used to assess previous night's sleep profile. It is used to measure sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency (1 item), hours of sleep (1 item), number of awakenings (1 item), total WASO (1 item), quality of sleep (1 item). Quality of sleep subscale: numerical rating completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Quality of sleep subscale score ranges from 0-100. Higher score indicates better quality of sleep.
  • RLS-Next Day Impact (RLS-NDI) [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
    The RLS-NDI is a participant-rated instrument designed to assess daytime performance as related to RLS and the participant's previous night's sleep. The instrument consists of 14 items that encompass 5 domains: tiredness; emotional functioning; social functioning; cognitive functioning; and activities of daily living. There is also 1 global item assessing overall well -being. Each item is scored on a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Total score is the sum of scores from question 1 to 14. The total score ranges from 0 to 140 where higher scores indicate a more severe impact.
  • Change From Baseline in RLS-NDI at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ]
    The RLS-NDI is a participant-rated instrument designed to assess daytime performance as related to RLS and the participant's previous night's sleep. The instrument consists of 14 items that encompass 5 domains: tiredness; emotional functioning; social functioning; cognitive functioning; and activities of daily living. There is also 1 global item assessing overall well -being. Each item is scored on a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Total score is the sum of scores from question 1 to 14. The total score ranges from 0 to 140 where higher scores indicate a more severe impact.
  • Limb Pain-Visual Analog Scale (Limb Pain-VAS) [ Time Frame: Baseline ]
    100 millimeter (mm) line (Visual Analog Scale) marked by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain.
  • Change From Baseline in Limb Pain-VAS at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12 ]
    100 mm line (VAS) marked by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain. Change = observation mean minus baseline mean.
  • Severity of Augmentation Symptoms at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    ASRS measures severity of augmentation and consist of three items to be completed by clinician. Clinician would score participants' answers by comparing post-baseline evaluations to those at baseline. ASRS total score range: 0-24, with higher score indicating more severe augmentation.
  • Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    CGI-S: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1 (normal-not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Higher score = more affected.
  • Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    MOS-SS: Participant rated instrument to assess sleep quantity, quality; comprised of 12 items yielding 7 subscale scores: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakening short of breath/headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, 2 composite index scores: sleep problems Index I, II. Sleep adequacy data was reported at week 12 and not for first 12 weeks (average). Subscale scores range: 0-100; exception quantity of sleep (range 0-24 hours). With exception of sleep quantity and sleep adequacy, higher scores reflect poorer sleep outcomes.
  • Number of Participants With Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)- Optimal Sleep at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    MOS-SS: Participant rated instrument to assess sleep quantity, quality; comprised of 12 items yielding 7 subscale scores: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakening short of breath/ headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, 2 composite index scores: sleep problems Index I, II. Optimal sleep subscale scores range: 0-1; Optimal sleep = 1 if 'Average hours sleep' = 7 or 8, is 0 if 'Average hours sleep' is non-missing and less than 7, and is missing if 'Average hours sleep' is missing. Higher scores reflect better sleep outcomes.
  • Profile of Mood State (POMS) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    POMS are participant-rated instrument comprising 6 sub-scales (tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, vigor-activity, fatigue-inertia, and confusion-bewilderment) and each subscale comprising 5 items, on 'How you feel right now?' (Scale: 0=not at all, 1=a little, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit, 4=extremely). All items were rated in the same direction except for vigor-activity. A total score is obtained for each scale. The range of total score is 0 - 100, with higher score indicating more mood disturbance.
  • Restless Legs Syndrome-Quality of Life Scale (RLS-QoL) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    RLS QoL: Participant rated instrument used to assess the impact of RLS on quality of life and health status function (symptom severity, daily activity, social functioning, sleep, concentrating and decision making, traveling, sexual activity, and work) yielding a summary score ranging from 0-100. Higher scores reflect better quality of life.
  • Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 36 (SF-36) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being (physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health); 2 summary scores (physical and mental component); and self evaluated change in health status (summary of health status). The score for subscale scores and 2 summary score is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Summary of health status is a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "0=much worse now" to "4=much better now". Higher subscale and summary score reflect better health status.
  • Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: Week 12 ]
    WPAI: 6 question participant rated questionnaire to determine degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and outside of work. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism and presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), overall work impairment score combining absenteeism and presenteeism, percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. Score range: 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 10 (completely affected/impaired). WPAI outcomes expressed as impairment percentages with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
  • Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ) [ Time Frame: up to 12 months ]
  • RLS Quality of Life (RLS-QoL) [ Time Frame: up to 12 months ]
  • Augmentation Severity Rating Scale (ASRS) [ Time Frame: up to 12 months ]
  • Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) [ Time Frame: up to 12 months ]
  • Medical Outcomes Study - Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) [ Time Frame: up to 12 months ]
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Long Term Study Of Pregabalin In Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome Patients
Randomized, Double Blind, 12-Month Study Of Pregabalin In Subjects With Restless Legs Syndrome
This purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of pregabalin in treating idiopathic RLS patients for up to 12 months.
Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 3
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome
  • Drug: placebo and pregabalin
    following 3 months placebo treatment, subjects are to be re-distributed to pregabalin 300 mg per day for 9 months. Both placebo and pregabalin are to be administered orally once a day, 1-3 hours before bedtime.
    Other Name: Lyrica
  • Drug: pramipexol
    following 3 months placebo treatment, subjects are to be re-distributed to pramipexol 0.25mg per day for 9 months. Both placebo and pramipexol are to be administered orally once a day, 1-3 hours before bedtime.
    Other Name: Mirapex
  • Drug: pramipexol
    following 3 months placebo treatment, subjects are to be re-distributed to pramipexol 0.5mg per day for 9 months. Both placebo and pramipexol are to be administered orally once a day, 1-3 hours before bedtime.
    Other Name: Mirapex
  • Drug: Pregabalin
    pregabalin 300 mg, orally administered once a day, 1- 3 hours before the bedtime for 12 months
    Other Name: Lyrica
  • Drug: pramipexol
    pramipexol 0.25 mg, orally administered once a day, 1- 3 hours before the bedtime for 12 months
    Other Name: Mirapex
  • Drug: pramipexol
    pramipexol 0.5 mg, orally administered once a day, 1- 3 hours before the bedtime for 12 months
    Other Name: Mirapex
  • Experimental: PBO/PGB 300 mg
    Intervention: Drug: placebo and pregabalin
  • Active Comparator: PBO/PPX 0.25 mg
    Intervention: Drug: pramipexol
  • Active Comparator: PBO/PPX 0.5 mg
    Intervention: Drug: pramipexol
  • Experimental: PGB 300 mg
    Intervention: Drug: Pregabalin
  • Active Comparator: PPX 0.25 mg
    Intervention: Drug: pramipexol
  • Active Comparator: PPX 0.5 mg
    Intervention: Drug: pramipexol
Allen RP, Chen C, Garcia-Borreguero D, Polo O, DuBrava S, Miceli J, Knapp L, Winkelman JW. Comparison of pregabalin with pramipexole for restless legs syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2014 Feb 13;370(7):621-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303646.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
731
700
May 2011
May 2011   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • idiopathic RLS with the presence of all four clinical manifestations of RLS
  • RLS symptoms occur predominantly in the evening
  • RLS history at least 6 months
  • IRLS => 15 at the beginning and the end of placebo run-in
  • Have =>15 nights with RLS symptoms in the month prior to screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any secondary RLS
  • Current augmentation due to RLS treatment
  • Placebo responders identified during the placebo run-in
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Austria,   Finland,   Germany,   Italy,   Netherlands,   Spain,   Sweden,   United Kingdom,   United States
 
 
NCT00806026
A0081186
Yes
Not Provided
Not Provided
Pfizer
Pfizer
Not Provided
Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center Pfizer
Pfizer
August 2012

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP