We are updating the design of this site. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Anterior Defect Correction With Mesh Plus Treatment of Stress Incontinence With Transobturator or Transvaginal Approach

This study has been terminated.
(Low recruitment rate.)
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00743535
First Posted: August 29, 2008
Last Update Posted: April 8, 2013
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Stefano Palomba, University Magna Graecia
August 28, 2008
August 29, 2008
April 8, 2013
February 2008
February 2013   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Objective/subjective symptoms improvements [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00743535 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Intra-operative complication rate [ Time Frame: one day ]
  • Postoperative complications rate [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
  • Failure rate [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
  • Recurrence rate [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
  • Quality of life [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
  • Sexual function [ Time Frame: 12 months ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Anterior Defect Correction With Mesh Plus Treatment of Stress Incontinence With Transobturator or Transvaginal Approach
A Comparison in Terms of Efficacy and Safety Between Transobturator and Transvaginal Tape Performed at the Same Time of Anterior Defect Correction With Mesh
The incidence of anterior pelvic defect in women is estimated about 10% and it may be often associated to urinary stress incontinence. To date the correction of anterior defects with the use of graft material inserted with transobturator approach has become of large use. Moreover, given the frequent association of urinary stress incontinence to anterior defect, in most of cases it becomes necessary to perform at the same time an anti-incontinence procedure, i.e. a sub-urethral sling positioning. Based on these considerations the aim of this trial will be to compare two different approach for sub-urethral sling positioning, transobturator and transvaginal tape (TOT and TVT) performed in association to transobturator correction of anterior defect with mesh in terms of efficacy and safety.

Women with anterior defect and genuine stress urinary incontinence will be enrolled and randomized in two groups (arm 1 and 2). All patients will be treated with a transobturator correction of anterior defect, in patients of arm 1 will be associated TOT, whereas in patients of arm 2 will be associated TVT.

All patients eligible will undergo baseline assessment consisting of anthropometric, clinical, hormonal, urodynamic, and ultrasonographic evaluations. During the study, the surgical outcomes, the clinical subjective and objective efficacy data, and the adverse experiences will be evaluated in each patient.

Data will be analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle and a P value of 0.05 or less will be considered significant.

Interventional
Phase 4
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Cystocele
  • Stress Urinary Incontinence
  • Procedure: Transobturatory correction of anterior defect plus TOT

    Longitudinal vaginal incision 1 cm far from esternal urethral meatus. Bladder dissecting and identification of ischiatic spines. Bilateral transobturator insertion of anterior mesh through high and low trans-obturatory approach. Mesh anchorage.

    Small incision sites in the femoral/pelvic fold. Bilateral transobturator insertion of mesh by means of mono-use needle

  • Procedure: Transobturatory correction of anterior defect plus TVT

    Longitudinal vaginal incision 1 cm far from esternal urethral meatus. Bladder dissecting and identification of ischiatic spines. Bilateral transobturator insertion of anterior mesh through high and low trans-obturatory approach. Mesh anchorage.

    Small incision sites at sovrapubic level. Bilateral retropubic insertion of mesh by means of mono-use needle.

  • Experimental: 1
    Transobturatory correction of anterior defect plus TOT
    Intervention: Procedure: Transobturatory correction of anterior defect plus TOT
  • Active Comparator: 2

    Longitudinal vaginal incision 1 cm far from esternal urethral meatus. Bladder dissecting and identification of ischiatic spines. Bilateral transobturator insertion of anterior mesh through high and low trans-obturatory approach. Mesh anchorage.

    Small incision sites at sovrapubic level. Bilateral retropubic insertion of mesh by means of mono-use needle.

    Intervention: Procedure: Transobturatory correction of anterior defect plus TVT
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Terminated
15
Not Provided
February 2013   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cystocele
  • Genuine stress urinary incontinence by self report, examination and test
  • Urethral hypermobility
  • Eligible for both surgical procedures
  • Ambulatory

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • <12 months post-partum
  • Systemic disease and/or drugs known to affect bladder function
  • Current chemotherapy or radiation therapy
  • Urethral diverticulum, augmentation cytoplasty, or artificial sphincter
  • Recent pelvic surgery
  • Previous pelvic or anti-incontinence surgery
  • History of severe abdominopelvic infections
  • Known extensive abdominopelvic adhesions
  • Detrusor instability and/or intrinsic sphincter dysfunction
  • Other gynaecologic pathologies (eg, fibroids, ovarian cysts)
  • BMI >30
Sexes Eligible for Study: Female
18 Years to 80 Years   (Adult, Senior)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Italy
 
 
NCT00743535
03/2008
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Stefano Palomba, University Magna Graecia
University Magna Graecia
Not Provided
Principal Investigator: Stefano Palomba, MD Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro
Study Chair: Fulvio Zullo, MD Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro
University Magna Graecia
April 2013

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP