We updated the design of this site on September 25th. Learn more.
Show more
ClinicalTrials.gov
ClinicalTrials.gov Menu

Comparative Study of NXL104/Ceftazidime Versus Comparator in Adults With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00690378
First Posted: June 4, 2008
Last Update Posted: October 12, 2017
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Information provided by:
AstraZeneca
May 29, 2008
June 4, 2008
October 12, 2017
November 2008
June 2010   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
  • Estimate the by-patient microbiological response of NXL104/ceftazidime in the treatment of adult patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) [ Time Frame: 5 to 9 days post-therapy ]
  • Evaluate the safety and tolerability profile [ Time Frame: Treatment plus 14 days ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00690378 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
  • Estimate the clinical outcome of NXL104/ceftazidime [ Time Frame: End of IV therapy, Test of Cure visit 5 to 9 days post-therapy and late follow-up visit ]
  • Estimate the by-pathogen microbiological response [ Time Frame: End of IV therapy, the Test of Cure visit 5 to 9 days post-therapy and at the late follow-up visit ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
 
Comparative Study of NXL104/Ceftazidime Versus Comparator in Adults With Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
Prospective, Multicenter, Investigator-blinded, Randomized, Comparative Study Estimate Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy of NXL104/Ceftazidime vs. Comparator Followed Appropriate Oral Therapy Treatment Complicated UTI Hosp Adults
The purpose of this study is to determine whether NXL104 plus ceftazidime is effective in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections as compared to a comparator group.
Not Provided
Interventional
Phase 2
Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single (Investigator)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Complicated Urinary Tract Infection
  • Drug: NXL104/ceftazidime
    125mg/500mg TID
  • Drug: Imipenem/Cilastatin
    4 x daily
  • Experimental: 1
    NXL/104 ceftazidime
    Intervention: Drug: NXL104/ceftazidime
  • Active Comparator: 2
    comparator 4 x daily
    Intervention: Drug: Imipenem/Cilastatin
Vazquez JA, González Patzán LD, Stricklin D, Duttaroy DD, Kreidly Z, Lipka J, Sable C. Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis, in hospitalized adults: results of a prospective, investigator-blinded, randomized study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Dec;28(12):1921-31. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.748653. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
 
Completed
150
July 2010
June 2010   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute pyelonephritis or other complicated urinary tract infection due to gram negative pathogens

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ileal loops or vesicoureteral reflux
  • complete obstruction of any portion of urinary tract, perinephric or intrarenal abscess.
  • fungal urinary tract infection
  • permanent indirect catheter or nephrostomy unless removed within 48 hours of study entry
  • history hypersensitivity to study medication
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years to 65 Years   (Adult)
No
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Jordan,   Lebanon,   United States
 
 
NCT00690378
NXL104/2001
No
Not Provided
Not Provided
Carole Sable MD Chief Medical Officer, Novexel Inc
AstraZeneca
Not Provided
Study Director: Carole A Sable, MD Novexel Inc
AstraZeneca
August 2011

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP