Try our beta test site
IMPORTANT: Listing of a study on this site does not reflect endorsement by the National Institutes of Health. Talk with a trusted healthcare professional before volunteering for a study. Read more...

Children's Aid Societies: Differential Response and Wraparound Prevention Trial

This study has been completed.
McMaster University
Information provided by:
Hamilton Children's Aid Society Identifier:
First received: November 15, 2007
Last updated: June 22, 2011
Last verified: November 2009

November 15, 2007
June 22, 2011
October 2006
Not Provided
To measure the characteristics of families and their children and comparisons between usual care versus differential response [ Time Frame: Follow-up at 1 year and 2 years ]
Same as current
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00559208 on Archive Site
Follow up measures at 1 year and 2 year follow ups including measuring whether differential response is happening [ Time Frame: 6 months after facilitator is assigned ]
Same as current
Not Provided
Not Provided
Children's Aid Societies: Differential Response and Wraparound Prevention Trial
The Comparative Effects and Expense of Augmenting Usual Children's Aid Society (CAS) Care With a Regional Differential Response and Wraparound Prevention Service for Children
The purpose of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of this Differential Wraparound model, in 5 Children's Aid Societies within Hamilton-Niagara Region, in preventing maltreatment cases from either becoming ongoing protection cases, or the children ending up in out-of-home of out-of community placements, as well as reducing the amount of time in Children's Aid Society care as compared to usual Children's Aid Society risk assessment and protection service alone.
The number of children in child welfare care has increased from 10,000 in the early 1990s to over 18,000. Ontario spends over $1.1 billion a year on direct child welfare services, more than twice as much as spent in the late 1990s, with the majority of these resources spent on investigation instead of treatment. In response to this situation, Differential Response models, sometimes called alternative, multiple or integrated system responses, have been implemented in the US, Australia and Canada and are all at the beginning stages of systematic evaluation. These models will help prevent maltreatment cases from becoming ongoing protection cases, or the children ending up in out of home or community placements, and reduce the amount of time in Children's Aid Society care. This research will show the benefits and costs of a Differential Response approach to Children's Aid Society care, specifically in the Hamilton-Niagara Region
Observational Model: Case Control
Time Perspective: Prospective
Not Provided
Not Provided
Probability Sample
Clients of CAS going on to protective custody cases
Not Provided
Children's Aid Societies
Comparing differential response (Wraparound) with usual care
Not Provided

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by Identifier (NCT Number) in Medline.
December 2010
Not Provided

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parent of children and youth, living in Hamilton and surrounding areas.
  • Newly referred substantiated cases going on to protective services.
  • English & non-English speaking.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Safety threat
  • Non-substantiated cases not going to protective services.
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
1 Year to 80 Years   (Child, Adult, Senior)
Contact information is only displayed when the study is recruiting subjects
Not Provided
Not Provided
Not Provided
Dominic Verticchio, Hamilton Children's Aid Society
Hamilton Children's Aid Society
McMaster University
Principal Investigator: Dominic Verticchio Children's Aid Society
Hamilton Children's Aid Society
November 2009

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP